charter wrote:374, crypto, muh is suspicious because he added the "I'm not bandwagoning" clause after his vote.
Right. My point was that Hiphop didn't highlight that and instead concentrated on something that wasn't scummy.
BMC, you don't think it's possible that Staple might be newbie town, and that he's reluctant to replace out because it would look bad to replace out of one of his first games on the site?
That said, scum who've lost interest in a given game are probably more inclined to lurk rather than request a replacement, because lurking benefits scum (when they suck at everything else). It plugs the flow if information.
bigmc109 wrote:if Staple flips town, I'll definitely be voting muh tomorrow
1. Fixed. People who misspell
definitely
should be flogged. Publicly.
2. Less importantly, this quote
could
be a Freudian slip. I know I'm always worried that I'm going to take a shell through the forehead each night. And that seeps into my posts— "
If I don't kick the bucket tonight
, I'll definitely be voting Muh tomorrow." BMC didn't take that into account, but he may have just overlooked it. *shrug* Probably null.
Staple wrote: You are lying with your quote. I said that I can understand why you guys would want to lynch me, not that you should. The 2 quotes you made; "go ahead lynch me", and "lynch me so I can prove I'm town" are both false, and untrue.
Did it
really
not occur to you that he was paraphrasing? I'm seriously questioning the authenticity of this misunderstanding.
On the other hand, upon rereading Staple's posts, BMC's paraphrasing was inaccurate. Staple didn't explicitly express disinterest in the game.
Staple wrote:Never said that anyone must lynch me, in fact contrary to that I have been preaching the opposite.
No, you have not been preaching the opposite. Your play has been very passive, noncommittal, and lazily sarcastic, and you convey hardly any—if any at all—distaste for your own lynch:
Staple wrote:I guess you guys are correct in lynching me, since I know I've been playing scummy. I will probably only cause more confusion throughout the game because of my scummy behavior these first few pages. You guys also do not lose much by lynching since I have not been contributing at all.
Think the only way I could defend myself at this moment is to say that I will be more active from here on in, and I am a townie so it does not benefit the town to lynch me.
Staple wrote:Crypto, I feel you are a bit erratic and all over the place. You seem to be a bit paranoid. Everything I have said is true. How is it an appeal to emotion when I say exactly what is true.
Is it a lie when I say that I am a good vote because I have not been contributing and I have come across as scummy?
Staple wrote:@pom: Because I'm a villa.
You don't know this for sure so voting for me is perfectly justifiable.
Staple wrote:@Muh:
God I must be the worst scum ever.
All of Staple's attacks, except for his initial swipe at X_~, have been counteroffensive. He accused me of being "a bit erratic and all over the place . . . a bit paranoid." Then he threw up a semi-OMGUS vote against BMC at the bottom of the last page.
I don't really get Charter's beef with BMC. BMC laid out the possibilities and pointed out which was more likely. In fact, Staple comes out of this exchange looking even worse than before. But I'm unnerved by Pom's willingness to vote for him. Pom is extremely scummy, and busing on day 1 with this seemingly town-stacked setup would be suicide. So if RayFrost redeems himself I'll have to choose between Pom and Staple.