@Brother
You are dead but you should still be following this game. Since I had to go V/LA I'll answer you anyways.
Brother wrote:What? You want me to threaten them with L-4 or L-3? Oooooo, so scary. I'm only 3 votes away from being lynched. What ever shall I do? That doesn't really put pressure on a person. Like I said, I don't like moving my vote around much. Makes me look all Wishy Washy. I prefer to only unvote when I'm about to switch it to some one else.
This in itself is scummy pre and post cop flip. You are saying that the only way you can motivate people is through bandwagon. While yes this is day 1 and action/reaction play is strong in itself bandwagon hopping and voting isn't your only tool to play this game. You can post you know, questions?
@Vendel
87: You do realize you could have just asked my why I didn't answer your post. I missed it when I did my reread but I swear that I answered it. Guess that is a DTM mistake here.
But in reference to your attack on me, there isn't much to say other then it's a weak line of attack in general. Trying to say I'm scummy because I find someone else's case weak and false means I'm scummy? It's not scummy if you think a case is wrong, or if you think someone is townie at the time.
In fact that is the whole point of discussion over cases, you agree and disagree. So your argument is pretty weak there.
91: You do know that you are establishing a link between Concerned and yourself here. You are attacking all the people who seemed to offend you or concerned in this game at this point. Oh Irony.
104: Its false to say all defenses are scummy, but unwarranted or unsupported defenses are. If you can't prove that x person is town or if y person is scummy, then your defense falls flat and you yourself are scummy.
154: I have a gazillion issues with your arguments.
1. Cruelty and myself voted brother for his scummy play. Note that this is before I went VLA and before brother's cop claim.
I attacked brother on page 4 with:
DTMaster wrote:Brother
68: That's a poor excuse to not pressure other people. You said geek passed your reaction test, I find your lack of unvoting faulty and would like you to explain:
Do you think geek is scummy? Why or why not? If he is scummy then why did you say
Brother wrote: reactions. I wanted to see if you'd freak out and overreact. Obviously, you didn't, and
handled the situation as a townie most likely would.
Unvote
Vote Brothernature
I also find it funny you ignore Concerned on his vote on post 84.
2. The irony must not have dawned on you that you are accusing me of being scummy for attacking brother pre-claim because I felt his posts were antitown/scummy and fake scum hunting. You fail to address the content in my posts and misrepresent me as pushing for a brother lynch and finally you say you are cleared because brother is scummy.
You hammered the claimed cop who did not have a counter claim against him.
@Concerned
115: If I was there I would say SCUMMY PLAY: YOU ARE JUSTIFYING LYNCHING THE UN COUNTER CLAIMED COP. I CAPS THIS BECAUSE IT'S A GIANT RED FLAG OF SCUM.
But brother killed this argument when he self voted. :<
@Troll
Welcome!
Comments.
1. Good general comments but as a personal philosophy, all PRs should be dealt with day 2 onwards. Night kills become a tool of role confirmation of PRs if there wasn't a doctor, and if there was we could have avoided a NK. Unless the scum team is willing to setup a doc/cop false claim setup but with the role reveals from last night it is obvious this is out of the question.
There are other methods scum could have acted kill, some involves placing WIFOM seeds into the town which I consider a more advanced move that SEs and ICs would have more experience in.
.
