KoC, 612 wrote:I believe what ZazieR is, rather unsubtly, suggesting is that only scum don't suspect anyone, and that if you don't suspect anyone, you must be doing absolutely nothing during the day, and waiting for night. Which is a damn good point,
Very good post, very good point.
KoC, 639 wrote:Uhm, correct me if I'm wrong, BigBear, and this is just what I got from my readthrough, but... didn't DRK start the Jester speculation? Because from what I read, DRK made a comment alluding to 3rd parties, then later clarified he was thinking of Jesters when making that comment. So... uhm... explain?
YES YES YES YES YES
THANK YOU for seeing my point!
BigBear, 642 wrote:Good call, I missed that connection.
Unvote:
Vote: DeathRowKitty
No offense, but if you missed that connection, then you must not have read my posts from my argument with DRK.
KoC, 651 wrote:At the end of the day, all those fancy words don't hide the fact that you, not Nook, initiated Jester dialogue with IK. You brought it up first. No-one was even considering it before you said that to IK.
Bringing a Jester (a horrible role I have only ever used in Bastard setups offsite) into the game without any reason to do so, is scummy. Just 'cause you didn't say "Hey, IK, think this is a jester?" doesn't make it less scummy.
So much vindication in one post.
DRK, 653 wrote:@KoC
What about bringing up a jester do you find scummy?
The fact that you only ask this question when pressured by more than one player is telling. Sounds like scum reverting back to a more fundamental argument to try to get out of a lynch.
BigBear, 672 wrote:FoS
-I was the third vote on you, why are you/were you so worried?
-Bandwagons are quite normal.
-You do realize that I am no longer voting you.
No, I didn't realize that you were no longer voting you, I started where I left off and read from there. And third vote on a wagon is a scumtell.
Furry, 675 wrote:Something tells me if you find it hard to respond to a paragraph you are going to hate me in the next few days
*shrug*
ah well, I will get typing here soon anyways.
Also if someone can put up a reason why DJ is getting votes, and explain why DRK (who looks pretty town to me) is getting votes too, I would be much obliged.
Got a replacement keyboard now, so responding to a paragraph shouldn't be a problem. Now the hating you part, we'll see.
Furry, 679 wrote:"fully?" ok... what that means is it WAS in part serious. If anything is partially serious, you have seen a scumtell. If you have seen a scumtell, the RVS is over. Prolonging the RVS is a slight scumtell, since you are avoiding scumhunting when its readily available. But we have him abandoning a partially serious vote for another random vote later on.
Valid point. I can't argue against it, because I was scummy. Is it a major point? No.
Furry wrote:This is just such a big fence sit its quite amazing. BB did something scummy, but he is a good player so its null, but its a scummy thing. What is this even? It just feels like calling someone scum and town at the same time, especially that last line.
No, I was saying, in a nutshell, that BigBear's scummy action did not fit his scum meta from my experience with playing with him. I don't see how this is fencesitting.
Furry wrote:What does this trap accomplish though?
It draws out reactions, which can be analyzed to try and determine someone's alignment. For example, we could see who agrees with whom on the issue to build connections. A gambit is a discussion starter to aid in scumhunting.
Looker, 677 wrote:So this means that you're wasting our time? You don't find DRK suspicious at all, you simply like to argue? Not to say that this is a bad thing, it was entertaining to say the least, and I'm sure we can dredge up some interactions in the instance of either your or DRK's demise, lynch or otherwise.
No, I had a valid point to prove. The argument
escalated
because I like to argue.
Looker wrote:So many things happen at once, who can keep up? And the team has changed regarding my suspicions. As of this post, I believe the culprits are Don_Johnson, Furry, and Sanjay. I'm also suspicious of Cookie or BigBear; however,
I believe their role, whomever has it, to be one consistent of pro-towness.
Possible role fishing, anyone?