Neo-con John
ok, underlined what my responce is relevant to. italics are other interesting tidbits, I didn't find relevant enough to include the first time.
NCJ wrote:Hello All
I
like the idea of asking questions
as it seems like it will get everyone a bit more engaged. It just seems like a more sophisticated way to play which I would imagine is why the deadline is set for 20 days!
20 Questions great way to start game
I don't really see how someone could have a positive opinion on lurking, I definitely see it as bad behavior.
The more people talk the better it is for the game and the less people talk the more likely we are to make a bad decision as a whole.
I plan to talk... a lot, so count on seeing plenty of me.
Lurking = bad and anti-town
I do not have any experience with a no-lynch so
I can only follow the wisdom of my fellow players
who seem to agree that a
no-lynch actually only favors scum.
Admits to going with crowd and NL=bad
so that's hard to do, so I'm switching methods, underlined is still relevant and italics are other tidbits.
NCJ wrote:So
from what I gather so far there have been small fingers of suspicion cast at RPG and PE, a very small finger pointed at Gayle, and what I would describe as a strong finger being pointed at tracker
which has actually resulted in a vote. That is 4 out of 9 players that have been accused in some fashion, and
I like to think that the group
cannot be dead wrong on all four,
meaning we have a fairly good chance that at least one of those listed is actually scum
.
RPG, PE, Gayle and Tracker are all under suspicion, one must be scum
NCJ wrote:Tracker seems very suspicious to me.
From the beginning I saw the
questions as good for the game
but also as really good for tracker as it
provides a great cover for scum
.
He gives the appearance of being pro-town while at the same time
collecting valuable information on all of us and maybe even dividing us amongst ourselves
. His
second line of questions looked to me like someone trying to divert our attention away from the RPG/PE fiasco in PS# 29-33.
The questions themselves just seem weak and quickly put together, What is your favorite role?, C'mon. I am not quite quite ready to vote but I am
Seriously considering:tracker
Tracker-very suspicious, questions good way to start but also very scummy. Collecting valuable information about all of us, and dividing us among ourselves. Second bout of questions distraction questions.
NCJ wrote:This is an interesting piece of evidence here. I understand that
this could have been an innocent unintentional use of words but it also could be a Freudian slip
. If so it suggests that
(1)RPG is scum;
(2)RPG's scumpartner is one of the people he has not interacted with yet.
Ill do the research later on who RPG has and has not ben in contact with, unless someone else would like to.
If true, it would mean that tracker is not scum as he and RPG have communicated with each other
, or a deeper unrelated ruse could be at work. Perhaps RPG's scum strategy is to strongly accuse his partner right off the bat in order to throw the rest of us off.
Admittedly
I am speaking from a position that is already highly critical of tracker so I do not know how objective this actually is
,
but I do believe this new piece of evidence is something worth looking at
. Though
I am not even really completely sold on the idea that RPG is scum. Like I said it could just be a misuse of words.
RPG-Freudian Slip, RPG=scum, and RPG’s scum-buddy hasn’t been talked, says he’ll figure out who that is. This would mean tracker does not = scum so this probably is poor word choice.
New: NCJ why don't you ever take a solid position on anything?
NCJ wrote:I am not at all surprised that PE has voted me as he is one of the few people I have accused
, and from what
I understand some people make judgments in this game,just as in real life, based on personal feelings and not necessarily on facts
, which isn't always even a bad thing. It is interesting that you would react with a straight vote though.
I apologize for my post count I will start posting more.
PE claims my posts are not substantial enough and that I only reiterate points made by others. This is partly true, though I would argue that summary is analysis
as it allows people to analyze the events of the game in a condensed fashion and thorough another persons perspective. That is really what I was trying to provide was perspective, which I feel is a major part of this game.
At this point I am at an impasse.
My strongest suspicion is on tracker
though with the amount of votes on him already
I am hesitant to put one through.
Anyone want to discuss this
? If there is a
scumwagon on tracker that would suggest that TF, Commie X, or RPG are scum
. In another possibility,
perhaps the wisdom of the crowd is correct.
Maybe those three are all honest townsfolk who are right to vote tracker because he (as I agree) has been acting real scummy.
In any case I apologize for my lack of posts. I will read the game over again and try to post something else tomorrow.
Dismisses PE’s vote as personal feeling rather than, actual scum-tell.
Summary=analyzed, as it gives “perspective”
I want to vote Tracker, but only if somebody gives me permission, either tracker=town and his wagon is scum, or tracker=town and his wagon is right.
sorry about the delay. Neo-con John seems really scummy to me, and since he won't answer the questions asked of him, I'll
vote: NCJ
POST!
I'm really not worried about a quick-lynch, as anyone who quick-lynches anybody else, they would be almost guarnteed scum and i would gladly trade myself for a scum. (This goes for everything, try and wait before voting, give the other a chance to post, never hammer without giving the prospective lynchee a chance to talk after being put at L-1 and given a chance to defend himself.) However, if TCJ won't defend himself when given an oppurtunity, maybe a little incentive will help him along.
