This post sounds like a lot of "I don't really care much about who gets lynched, I just want the day to end, but I don't want to draw attention to myself by ending after someone points out that it might not be beneficial to do so." Which is definitely NOT pro-town.Gayle wrote:Yeah, I'm just saying it didn't seem like a good idea to hammer immediately after someone points out we still have plenty of time.imkingdavid wrote: You're free to do what you want. If you feel that it's a good time to hammer, do so. I was just pointing out the amount of time we had left.
At that time, I didn't think of anyone as outright scum, but I had more confidence in tracker being scum than anyone else, he was one away from lynch, and truthfully, I wanted the day to end. I just don't get tracker in general, and much of what he says doesn't make any sense to me. It was probably based more on feeling rather than fact.PaltryExcuse wrote: Why did you want to hammer tracker, Gayle? The last time I saw reasons from you to lynch tracker was very early in the day.
That all said, I would not vote for tracker now. Re-reading the last two pages and tracker's posts, my suspicions have changed.
At best with all this you've struck up more discussion, which is good.
btw,
That is why it is good to re-read instead of just hammering to end the day. BTW, this is post 172. The following is post 166:That all said, I would not vote for tracker now. Re-reading the last two pages and tracker's posts, my suspicions have changed.
What changed between 166 to 172? You seem to be in support for a tracker lynch but suddenly your suspicions have changed. Who have they changed to, then, and would you like to share?I mean I was a going to hammer tracker, but IKD suggested that we still have a week and so there is no reason to rush it. I don't think much of the case against NCJ, and am still leaning towards lynching tracker.
I'm not liking this recent behavior at all.