Not really. He's much scummier for refusing to comment on bigmc yesterday, and then calling me Kaiveran's scumbuddy when I asked him about it. He could have given a legit reason to vote muh (since there are a lot of them), but his reason is very weak.crypto wrote:Charter, I agree Peanut's last post is weird, but do you think some of it might be due to his relatively recent entrance?
Have you actually read this game? That's a serious question, because it doesn't look like you have at all. Guess what, not voting for a scumbag is scummy, doubly so when you defend that scumbag, which is what a bunch of people on my list did. I can't believe you're trying to push suspicion on me because I tried to lynch bigmc, that's just a terrible reason.Kreriov wrote:Well, in Charter and Crypto's case, because of who they suspect. I look at charter's list and I noticed a common theme for all 4 of his suspects. Not one was on the bigmc lynch. Not one. Guess what, AT LEAST one of the remaining scum is on that lynch. No way would both scum avoid the chance to bus a partner and appear townie once it was clear how the wind was blowing. In a wagon this big it is extremely common to find scum in the last 2 or 3 to hop on the wagon (i.e. Crypto), and yet, not one of Charter's list is even ON the wagon. In Crypto's case the only person on the wagon was the second one voting. Highly unlikely. Way more likely that Charter voted a scum partner early on, another common tactic, and then left his vote on his partner when the wagon grew and had to keep it there to look more townie by pointing to his starting a scum wagon. Very common tactics. Also, notice the agreement between Crypto and Charter's list. If one turns up scum, at this point I would definitely suspect a connection between them. I also feel Crypto is smart enough to realize it would suspicious to NOT include a suspect on the wagon and picked poorly.
Doh, I think I had muh and Pom blurred together in my head. You always preferred muh, but you made lots of statements passively defending bigmc, such as these.Sando wrote:Care to provide me a single example of where I did this? I never voted Pom, ever, I never deviated from Muh on D1 once I voted him (mostly because of my net going down), and most of my arguing was with Serial about who was the better lynch of Muh and bigmc. I don't think I even mentioned Pom once I voted Muh, while I did consistently say that while bigmc was scummy I thought Muh was more so.
Sando wrote:I'm still happy with my vote on Muh, Bigmc has at least put his arguments out there and on the line, Muh seems to be sitting back and letting things happen, not really getting involved since he's been called out on his vote. Oh, and as for him becoming more active since being asked to, being active and jumping on the first and most opportune candidate are different things.
Sando wrote:Bgmc, quite possibly scum, certainly up there, I just tend to like the fact that he's talkative, prepared to defend his position. I think that his attack on Staples was opportunistic, ie scummy. However, the fact that he's prepared to defend that position and not back down makes me think it was less opportunistic and more thought out than I initially thought.
Sando wrote:I voted Muh before Bigmc did what you think was scummy, I don’t think Muh has done anything to remove my vote, Bigmc has been posting, scumhunting etc. I want my vote on Muh for reasons previously stated.
Now that bigmc has flipped scum, your constant defending of him day one is more than lynchworthy.Sando wrote:I can see why Bmc looks scummy, what I'm not sold on is that this is one of 'the most obvious D1 lynches ever'. From what I can see he made a fairly innocuous comment about voting someone tomorrow, and some people have a meta game on him based on 1(?) scum game?
He did what I, and others, thought was an opportunistic attack on Staples, but his willingness to back that up when attacked over it makes it seem less opportunistic. Someone who jumps on the wagon and never defends the position (or even posts) seems much more opportunistic and scummy to me.
Super Accurate* Vote Count(as of post 1050):
muh316 - 5(hiphop, mask man, The Inquisition, Empking, peanutman)
crypto - 2(Sando, Kreriov)
peanutman - 1(charter)
Not Voting:Trumpet of Doom, Kaiveran, Pyromaniac, crypto, muh316
It takes 7 to lynch, 5 at deadline.