Would you believe that Ether dropping the F-bomb appears to be a meta-town-tell for her?Ether wrote:Annachie, are you going to fucking ...
Sometimes I think I am over-thinking this game
i agree, so i'll dare say that Annachie is pretty scummy to me, he's just repeating and requesting others to repeat themselves alot, hence wasting time hoping we won't lynch D-1.In post 335, Ether wrote:and start questioning people and discussing your suspicions. Coincidentally, that's also the only reliable way for us to read you.
Post 369, Annachie wrote:I have no opinion on RayFrost yet, but thought it was the best lynch option based on Incog's thoughts and yours and Ksen's votes.
Except, by saying that you agree with my thoughts and then lending your vote to the wagon of the person who's the "beneficiary" of these thoughts, you've now completely left the realm of just taking my opinion seriously with respect to game mechanics and strategy -- you're now agreeing with aPost 372, Annachie wrote:lol. When it comes to game mechanics and strategy and stuff, I take them, and yours and Patricks, very seriously.
Can you explain what you mean here? I've been scum before in a Newbie Game, and I was never under any posting restriction, so I don't get what you're talking about.Post 364, Annachie wrote:Lynching Incog(the IC) is worthwhile because a scum Incog is under posting restrictions and we might learn from it.
lol. I saw that before too.Post 371, Ether wrote:Incidentally, RayFrost signed up for another game.
There's a couple of null answers you've given that bring parts of "Being agood IC" to mind.Being a good IC wrote:While it is ok to lie as scum, it is NEVER ok to lie in your role as an IC. Never lie about game theory to get a tactical advantage.
Incog, I don't believe that I said that I agee with your case, just that your case against Ray is part of what makes Ray the best lynch target prospect at the moment.Incognito wrote:Post 369, Annachie wrote:I have no opinion on RayFrost yet, but thought it was the best lynch option based on Incog's thoughts and yours and Ksen's votes.Except, by saying that you agree with my thoughts and then lending your vote to the wagon of the person who's the "beneficiary" of these thoughts, you've now completely left the realm of just taking my opinion seriously with respect to game mechanics and strategy -- you're now agreeing with aPost 372, Annachie wrote:lol. When it comes to game mechanics and strategy and stuff, I take them, and yours and Patricks, very seriously.caseI've made against another person (Ether already covered this, but she talks funny sometimes).
What do you think it is?Post 393, Yankee wrote:Can someone please enlighten me on the Rayfrost case?
it did a little, however you kept posting fact that looked valid to me too, so you weren't tunnelling too much.In post 391, boberz wrote:Tyrope what do you think about my views on ksen, did it look like I was tunnelling him.
It's a fair point. I don't want to put too much stock in it because I think it's also possible starkmoon remembered to replace DarthRandal first just because his direct request was fresher in her mind. But it is in his favour.Annachie wrote:Patrick, since I notice that you are currently modding a game, what's your opinion on this?