just realize that you are being extremely unproductive with this attitude.
you have said you aren't willing to actually try to win my vote. therefore you are in effect
YEAH! See, now this is the kind of stuff that I look for. You make a point, state your claim. Nice.DeathRowKitty's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2015083#2015083]Post 1674[/url] wrote: Just a general comment: I'm starting to seea lotof confirmation bias against Sanjay. Even if you think Sanjay is scum, think about what you post before saying that everything Sanjay does is a scum tell.
Basically, I still think Sanjay is town.
Lol.archaebob's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2015119#2015119]Post 1675[/url] wrote:@ looker -
just realize that you are being extremely unproductive with this attitude.
you have said you aren't willing to actually try to win my vote. therefore you are in effectrequiringme to "ride your opinion". i don't plan to do that. I plan to be convinced by someone who can present themselves in a logical, helpful way.
semioldguy's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2015182#2015182]Post 1676[/url] wrote:@archaebob
How about you make an attempt of finding your own case/suspect rather than waiting to follow in the footsteps of the cases others make to you?
what about wynne?Looker wrote:EBWOP: That first "win" should say "when". See what I mean?
Do you have any good reason to think that scum didn't receive a copy of the vanilla role? Either posting a sample PM or sending one to scum is standard practice and it would be a pretty big mistake by the mod to have not done so. Kreriov's been a good mod and I find it more likely that Sanjay was playing to his values than that Kreriov a major modding mistake.Furry wrote:As much as this is more the mod catching scum then at least me, its a strong tell to claim the wrong thing. Also I guess its a good lesson on modding practices
No you are somewhat missing the point. There are two scenarios that I seeDeathRowKitty wrote:Do you have any good reason to think that scum didn't receive a copy of the vanilla role? Either posting a sample PM or sending one to scum is standard practice and it would be a pretty big mistake by the mod to have not done so. Kreriov's been a good mod and I find it more likely that Sanjay was playing to his values than that Kreriov a major modding mistake.Furry wrote:As much as this is more the mod catching scum then at least me, its a strong tell to claim the wrong thing. Also I guess its a good lesson on modding practices
DRK didn't make up anything.Looker wrote:I'm not hearing that. I'm glad and am more than appreciative you brought it up, but I'm not hearing that. I believe Sanjay is opportunistic enough as it is and it'd be inopportune for us to conjure up excuses for him. He will say what he will say but let's not be the ones to give him something to say. He's smart, he'll figure something out; he'll figure some kind of way to deflect all of your votes.
I didn't know this was possible. Is that allowed?DeathRowKitty's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2015316#2015316]Post 1685[/url] wrote:Mod, if you can answer this, did scum receive a copy of the vanilla role PM?
Okay.Sanjay's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2015688#2015688]Post 1690[/url] wrote:DRK didn't make up anything.Looker wrote:I'm not hearing that. I'm glad and am more than appreciative you brought it up, but I'm not hearing that. I believe Sanjay is opportunistic enough as it is and it'd be inopportune for us to conjure up excuses for him. He will say what he will say but let's not be the ones to give him something to say. He's smart, he'll figure something out; he'll figure some kind of way to deflect all of your votes.
Me playing to my values or whatever is the explanation I already gave.
What’s not to be serious? I thought it was a fairly benign request/question. I said I was interested “why you are so convinced of Sanjay's guilt so that I can consider your points and perhaps help you rid the town of scum.” Easy enough I would think. You aren’t on trial...I’m just trying to see your point of view and IMO the post you referred to for archaebob (1608) did not do that other than 1 or 2 minor suspicions imbedded from post 1112 quote (within 1608). As you have been the most active poster in the game...a cursory ISO on you does not easily reveal your reasons for suspecting Sanjay. This must be evidenced somewhat by the fact DRK and archaebob are asking for the same info. So that is my interest...why you suspect Sanjay. I am not sold on Sanjay being town...there just happens to be others in the game I suspect more. I don’t understand your defensiveness or lack of willingness to help others who deem your insights possibly worthwhile and valid. So ‘assist’ me. As for not putting in any work...what do you want? Hundreds of meaningless one-liners to pad my post counts? Sorry if I don’t have the time to put that much ‘work’ into the game.Looker wrote: I didn't satisfy your interest? What do you mean by this? What exactly do you think is going on? Am I on trial for something? What are you saying? I submitted, out of generosity no doubt, my reasons for suspecting Sanjay and, quite frankly, they are good reasons. Now whether or not they "satisfy your interest" should not be my concern. I'm not here to persuade you, I'm here to collaborate, to assist, to help, and you're not putting in any work. You question my opinions while giving none of your own to compare and Archaebob simply states that he's "going against the grain". You can't possibly be serious, can you?
I am on a cruise. They have internet but it is quite costly so I doubt I will be online onboard. If I have time in a port of call and there is an internet café handy...I might be able to check in briefly but I can’t not guarantee it. If I do get online...I will at least give a quick look into the sight and if there is anything I can add to what is currently taking place...without pouring over 15-20 new pages of material.DeathRowKitty wrote:I approve of the BB vote. Also, HF, will you have any access during that time?
And DKU?Sanjay wrote:As far as I recall, the only claim before mine was DJs.
I'm not quite sure which questions I am dodging. Could I get a post with the post numbers where your questions are again?Sanjay wrote:semioldguy, PLEASE stop dodging my questions.