Vi wrote:VP Baltar and Ojanen didn't bother to explain their votes. Your vote partially raised my "interest" because deliberate insults tend to do that, and partly because you then decided to push a reason onto your vote that was explained, albeit not satisfactorily.
I didn't explain my vote until post 73. I did however question a play of yours after I voted. I hadn't used it in a case at that point, and I never said my vote was due to the suspicions my question was designed to investigate.
Please show me where I said that the reason I voted you is because you place l-#s on your votes. You won't be able to. In fact, this
entire
discussion started after my vote. It didn't prompt my vote, or even relate to it until you all said that it was a case tied to my vote, which is incorrect.
My vote was no different than theirs other than it was later, and that I asked a question outside it as well.
Vi wrote:A similar question could be asked of you. There are now more people voting you than there were voting me. Why is my vote worth more attention?
You are suggesting that I investigate myself since I have more people on me now? I don't need to, I know my role. However I don't know yours.
Vi wrote:And you'll notice I didn't reply to your trumped-up accusation. It was essentially the same thing you said earlier, but in a more menacing tone.
That was the idea.
Vi wrote:So we're on the same page, your position is:
*I'm not particularly scummy
*You don't know who else could possibly be scummy after two pages
*You think you're being "picked on" by me in particular, and three other people in general
1) No not particularly scummy. But worth looking at at the moment. It would be hard for anyone to be bad enough to be 'particularly scummy' on page 3 of a game that really didn't start until page 2.
2) Nope. 2 pages. I have barely even begun to form my opinions on people... that would be why I was trying to ask and question instead of pushing cases. You have cases on two people here on page 2? Holy crap you are good. You don't have to give the case if you think I am deflecting, but who is number 2?
3) Nah, I wouldn't say you are picking on me. I think you are stretching things a bit. Everyone does in day 1. And its not like I haven't given you an excuse for looking my way. You should be suspicious of people suspicious of you too, given that you have a pro-town role. If you are scum, then it would be good to push suspicion towards people looking at you... so your play in this regard is a null tell to me. Did I say that I thought you were 'picking on me?'
VP wrote:So you are suggesting that it took you over an hour to find a couple games where Vi used the L-# in her
I am suggesting I went looking and was pre-occupied. It was lunch time for one. Second I am simultaneously doing work. I checked recent posts on her/his profile, and found a couple of games that (s)he did indeed post l-#'s.
The games, er, I didn't take notes but I could find them again if you wish. I remember one being on the first or second page of recents, and one on the second or third. I remember him being a mod in one thread hat I checked, so I had to move on. After I found the second I stopped looking and took his word for it. Probably went to lunch at that time, then came back and posted. And yes, addressed your concerns at that time.