mehPorochaz wrote:strikethrough text fail. Also strikethrough nothing you have done. Or at least rearrange them to make you have done nothing. 6 days ago and the most you have posted is 4 words.
I'm not allowed to say much
I spelled "warrent" wrongRosso Carne wrote:hey n00B, don't talk about disrespect. I don't tolerate disrespect towards anyone, including others reciprocating it from me. However, I will fail to respect people who don't warrent it.Vi wrote:What is your read on Xd, anyway? He's one of the few people you didn't mention in that last post.Sotty7 708 wrote:What happened to Xd?
---
I guess I may as well talk a little about thespiritof what I was trying to get at a few posts ago.
We need bandwagons. Specifically, we need a -lynch-. We're allowed four mislynches instead of the usual three, there are so many people nearly begging to be lynched that we likely won't miss them, this Day has dragged out for long enough, etc..
I know BloodCovenent isn't around right now, unless my memory is mistaken.
I know Izzy IS around, because I specifically remember seeing her posting in New York.
Rosso Carne just hit a level of disrespect usually reserved for zwetschenwasser, although Cayke was a mild Town read per tajo.
I'm willing to buy Sotty7 and SlySly's frustration as genuine for the time being.
I'm not lynching VP Baltar or Porochaz (at least not today, in the latter case).
I'm quite okay with an Xdaamno lynch, and a little iffy on a HowardRoark lynch.
Based on NK WIFOM and suchlike crackpot mumbo-jumbo I'm going to vote Xdaamno, though I could fairly enough be persuaded onto Izzy, RC, or HR. The major reason I'm not going for Izzy is because...Izzy's last post wrote:Posted:Thu Jan 21, 2010 10:25 am Post subject: 36@MOD: REPLACE HER REPLACE HER DON'T BOTHER WITH A PROD DO IT DO IT NOW NOW NOW
So,
Unvote: Sotty7(L-3)
Vote: Xdaamno
Choose sides. Lynch someone. Get it done in the next three pages.
No reason given.Vi wrote:Vote: Xdaamno(L-5)
A better-than-random vote.
Slight buddy up to Izzy.Vi wrote: @Izzy: NOW I see what you're seeing... but I'm not sure where you're going with it.
No reason given.Vi wrote:Unvote: Xdaamno(L-6)
Vote: crywolf20084 (henceforth: Cayke)
Setup to vote Otto with little reason.Vi wrote:If I didn't like my Cayke vote so much I would snapvote Otto right now.
Follows through with fairly meaningless vote on Otto.Vi wrote: and if this were a particularly complicated game or if last week was exam week too or if it looked like you were pressed for time at all i would feel maybe a little sympathetic
Unvote: Cayke(L-5)
Vote: Otto U.
Votes cayke for meta reasons/hasn't swayed Vi not to lynch cayke.Vi wrote:I certainly agree with this much, andsaberwolf 238 wrote:I'm thinking this is one of scum-cayke's ploys to stall the game.This game is going just fine without any outside influences, no need to stall it.it's not like Cayke or Hyl have actually said anything that would sway me from wanting to lynch them.
Ah, why not. I'll drink the wine and buy into the meta that I've witnessed for myself in Mafia of Order and Cayke just attested to.
Unvote: saberwolf(L-6)
Vote: Cayke
Moves vote to the 'larger wagon'. Previous attempts to get something to stick have failed, this 'larger wagon' may just be the best chance for Vi to support a mislynch.Vi wrote:VP Baltar 297 wrote:Soooo....tajo has the idea. Where they hell are the rest of you?Waiting for the other lurkers.
I'm not sure what to make of tajo durnkpsoting as the best he can do, but I suppose I can make do.
Unvote: Cayke(L-4)
Vote: HowardRoark
It's not JDodge, but it is someone scummy and there's a larger wagon over thisaway.
Pushes the mislynch of the wagon she is supporting.Vi wrote:I'll repeat you for you ^.^VP Baltar 328 wrote:Since we've actually decided to not play this game anymore. VOTE HOWARD ROARK. ffs, stop making me repeat myself.
VOTE HOWARD ROARK.
that means stop being an embarrassment to mafiascum, scumchat, and your biological parents and vote to lynch scum
States Cat is most likely town, as is Saber, another of her recent targets.Vi wrote:Also, Cat is probTown IMO.saberwolf is probably also Town, which is a relief because I doubt Poro's ability to say anything enlightening tbh. To answer about the person you left out, I initially thought Qooq was Town but upon reread I'm not sure if that should be so.
@mod: Please replace Qooq. This has nothing to do with the holidays and everything to do with last posting on the 13th.
She knows Izzy will never flip town so feels compelled to ask X question #2.Vi wrote:1) So... what are you doing toXdaamno 339 wrote:but the possibility of him just leading the town is one I want to investigate if Izzy flips town.counterVP Baltar's attempts to lead the Town, or otherwise show that said Town-leading isnotthe best thing a Townie could do right now?
2)When do you expect to see Izzy flip Town?
Plants the seeds of doubt about Cat.Vi wrote:Suddenly, activity.
My initial Cat read was based onwhich almost fits with what I would expect newbTown to say. Unfortunately, I'm not sure how newby skitzer is (as evidenced by his references to having played with Xd before) and newbTown would have left out the part about Xd being "definitely scummy".Cat #3 wrote:OK, I dislike playing with Xdaamno because of what's going on right now. Yes, he's definitely scummy, but he's almost always scummy acting.
Now note that Cat voted Xdaamno becausewhich coming off of his previous post (literally, the last post he made before this one) rings false.Cat #4 wrote:he's been acting just generally slightly scummy all game and I feel my vote need to be somewhere.
Thus, I'm re-evaluating my read on him, which is unfortunate because skitzer is a renowned nonentity and I highly value a read on that player slot.
Jumps off the failing wagon to attempt getting a new one going.Vi wrote:This is what you get for not knowing about ancient dentistry!
Unvote: HowardRoark(L-5)
Vote: JDodge
Realizes the Jdodge wagon is fruitless and senses the mislynch possibility on Howard is growing so jumps back on.Vi wrote:HowardRoark 442 wrote:VP Baltar (429) wrote:What do you think about JDodge?He's participatingand I'm not seeing any red flags.Unvote: JDodge(L-3)
Vote: HowardRoark
Pours the gas on the Cat(confirmed townie and vote for 6th different person, none of which were Izzy) wagon fire and kicks the wagon into overdrive to be "off the Howie wagon for a while." This after proclaiming Cat most likely town earlier.Vi wrote:I wouldn't mind jumping off the Howie wagon for a while.
Unvote: HowardRoark(L-4)
Vote: Cat
Pushes for the now confirmed townie mislynch.Vi wrote: Catwagon, go :arrow:
No Cat remorse after Cat was confirmed as townie.Vi wrote:Fascinating. hito was apparently more of a threat than a Cop... which either means that Prozac is scum, or hito was more on the right track than Chaz could be even with a Cop investigation. And the people who were threatened by hito were HowardRoark, Xdaamno, Izzy, and to a lesser extent Cayke...
Let's try this.
Vote: Xdaamno(L-5)
Vi is getting frustrated at Izzy's lack of participation and others kind of starting to circle the wagons around Izzy and places very temporary vote to distance.Vi wrote:Unvote: Xdaamno(L-5)
Vote: DizzyIzzyB13
Lies to RC to create confusion and states satisfaction she is getting from her vote on her non-participatory scumbuddy.Vi wrote:You are. ^_^Rosso Carne 660 wrote:Is anyone L-1?
I'm still voting for Izzy, which is pretty nice.
States Izzy is scum yet feels good the distancing tactic has had the desired effect and removes the vote while adding another reasonless one.Vi wrote:VP Baltar 672 wrote:Vi, do you think Izzy is more likely to be scum than BC or Howard?do you not agree that izzy is scum
tbh I don't think anything I say will get through to her, so :\
Unvote: DizzyIzzyB13(L-4)
Vote: BloodCovenent
Yet another vote not based on scumminess.Vi wrote:Vote: Sotty7(L-5)
Off the sidelines, plz ->
The best for last, let me paraphrase, "MOD, PLEASE REPLACE MY POOR EXCUSE FOR A SCUMBUDDY BEFORE SHE LOSES THE GAME FOR ME!!!!"Vi wrote: The major reason I'm not going for Izzy is because...Izzy's last post wrote:Posted:Thu Jan 21, 2010 10:25 am Post subject: 36@MOD: REPLACE HER REPLACE HER DON'T BOTHER WITH A PROD DO IT DO IT NOW NOW NOW
I think I cover this after the post you quote, but Vi is in the middle of the pack for me. Of the people on the Cat wagon her and BC are the two scummiest people there. It's as simple as that. As for my touchiness, I blame the game. It felt like Vi was pushing on me just cause, in a game as slow as this it annoyed me. A lot about this game is annoying me, trying to get past that though.VP Baltar Post 723 wrote:Wait, you think Vi is scum? That's odd. Also, you seem a bit sensitive over one vote being on you.
I also think SlySly's Vi case is contrived in the extreme.VPB wrote:Right now, nothing has changed my desire for a BC or HR lynch. Chaz is claimed cop. Vi is likely town in my eyes. Izzy was just replaced. Xd is a mild town read to me. Sotty recently came and I havent' developed my read yet (but I'm confident I will). Rosso is an idiot, but Cayke felt mildly townish. Jury is still out on SlySly for me. I actually think the pool for people who NEED to be lynched today is fairly limited.
I don't see how that would annoy you.Sotty7 730 wrote:As for my touchiness, I blame the game. It felt like Vi was pushing on me just cause, in a game as slow as this it annoyed me. A lot about this game is annoying me, trying to get past that though.
I am always extreme, I look for things I have seen scum do in a different manner than most. Gets me wrongly lynched often. IMO, Vi outed Izzy as scum partner with request for replacement. If another game wasn't still in progress I would give a perfect example. Her other request for replacement was not nearly as intense.VP Baltar wrote: I also think SlySly's Vi case is contrived in the extreme.
I don't mind you being extreme, since it'd be good to have someone getting more reactions in this game. Nor do I think it's necessarily bad that you're targetting Vi (even though I don't really believe she's scum at this time). I just feel you're reaching a great deal to make a case where there is none. Vi switching her vote to change the direction of the game and being annoyed by lurkers is well within her town meta. I don't think it's necessarily scummy of you to attack her for it if you've never played with her, but I think they aren't well grounded accusations when put into an overall context.SlySly wrote:I am always extreme, I look for things I have seen scum do in a different manner than most. Gets me wrongly lynched often. IMO, Vi outed Izzy as scum partner with request for replacement. If another game wasn't still in progress I would give a perfect example. Her other request for replacement was not nearly as intense.VP Baltar wrote: I also think SlySly's Vi case is contrived in the extreme.
I just want to get something done in this game is all.Vi wrote:Also: ITT, moreVi 732 wrote:I don't see how that would annoy you.Sotty7 730 wrote:As for my touchiness, I blame the game. It felt like Vi was pushing on me just cause, in a game as slow as this it annoyed me. A lot about this game is annoying me, trying to get past that though.
I was thinking the same thing when I was pushing you. I don't like my nonread on you.Sotty7 741 wrote:I just want to get something done in this game is all.Vi wrote:Vi 732 wrote:I don't see how that would annoy you.Sotty7 730 wrote:As for my touchiness, I blame the game. It felt like Vi was pushing on me just cause, in a game as slow as this it annoyed me. A lot about this game is annoying me, trying to get past that though.
Yes, well this isn't a newbie game and this is a pretty newbie philosophy for the most part. I'm against you not giving it because you seem to be going out of your way to keep your alleged suspicions as close to your chest as possible. Now, this likely either means a) you honestly believe that stating your suspicions is going to give the scum magical powers to pull the wool over your eyes (oh my!) or b) you don't actually have any real suspicions because you're scum.Howard wrote:I don't like posting scum <--> town lists because it gives scum a little bit more information about easier mislynches, not on-the-correct-trail, etc. (I figured you knew this because I said it in the Newbie game . . . guess you weren't paying as much attention as I thought.) VP Baltar, what exactly do you have against me not wanting to give this?
Because I've actually played with him before when he was town. Sometimes a bad case is just a bad case.Howard wrote:I obviously disagree with VP Baltar on the Xdaamno read. VP Baltar . . . jury is still out on SlySly but you see his case on Vi as extremely contrived . . . what's keeping him from being a scummy read?