How could he "go back to looking scummy" if you never originally believed he had stopped being scummy.
killa seven
Zodiark13
11 votes.
May 2nd - 5:40 PM EST
It's already been established (in this thread, multiple times) that Ramah is not the one, and only, lightning based character. Therefore, it goes without saying that it's probable that other lightning based characters will be in the game.Starbuck wrote:On PranaDevilI've already stated once that I am not familiar with the flavor in this game. So you ranting on about who someone claimed is not going to help me understand where you are coming from.PranaDevil wrote:That's beside the point, it's flimsy because he's claimed sodding Ramah! It hasn't been contested (and if he's lying... no, the real one shouldn't step forward until it's worth doing so), and thus he's not going to be scum in this game. Thus it's flimsy logic to focus on a good guy.Starbuck wrote:How is it flimsy? Besides the flavor clearly stating it, did you not take elementary science? What happens when a lightning bolt hits ANYTHING?
It's not good to assume that just because someone hasn't been counterclaimed that they are being true. It's Day 1.
It's also not a good idea to assume that good guys are immediately good and vice versa, especially since this is a Kise game.
Do an ISO on Zodiark if you can't answer those for yourself... it feels like you're stretching to negate my points on Zodiark, as opposed to actually paying attention to them yourself.Your supposed "case" and "vote" on Zodiark in Post 259 lacks all stability and I'll tell you why.
How and why didn't it help us any?PranaDevil wrote:Okay, a quick re-read of things... and Zodiark stands out to me, he came in, had a couple of posts talking about possible characters which didn't really help us any
What exactly?PranaDevil wrote:followed that up with a bunch of nothing posts, and ends with what still amounts to nothing
Why?PranaDevil wrote:even more so with using "OMGUS" as a reason why he would be voted by Glork.
Where? Do you have specific examples?PranaDevil wrote:Zodiark has offered us zero this entire game, but has made it "appear" like he has. That's scummy as far as I'm concerned.
Yes, I did respond to that, in fact FC responded to it first here, and I followed up with another response here, just because it quotes Antifinity doesn't mean it doesn't answer the same question.Also, did you answer this question from Wolf yet?
wolframnhart wrote:@Prana
What is the difference between Zodiarks absence and bv310? or Killa seven for that matter? Is it just the topics that each have/haven't?
Holy shit, it's the Master of the Obvious!PranaDevil wrote:It's already been established (in this thread, multiple times) that Ramah is not the one, and only, lightning based character. Therefore, it goes without saying that it's probable that other lightning based characters will be in the game.
Where in the hell did you get that from what I said?PranaDevil wrote:But are you honestly suggesting we lynch people who are more inclined to be on the side of the town (based on the games at hand), purely because "OMG He's lightning, and we had a lightning attack"?
I will say again in large type for you since you seem to keep ignoring this fact.PranaDevil wrote:As for good guys aren't immediately good, that is true. However by the same token, the first two guys killed are both good, and one of them is a mason... a mason who would be part of a group called Avalanche in FFVII (This has been brought up before too, more often than once again, so if you've somehow missed this, you need a re-read), therefore it's relatively safe to assume (at this point) that good will be on the side of good in this game.
This is a cop out. I am asking you to further elaborate & explain your case on Zodiark. Your refusal subsequent snarkiness proves to me that you were trying to take the lazy way out.PranaDevil wrote:Do an ISO on Zodiark if you can't answer those for yourself... it feels like you're stretching to negate my points on Zodiark, as opposed to actually paying attention to them yourself.
This is unnecessary and a personal insult because I never once called you dumb or stupid. I may be challenging your case, but I'm not insulting your intelligence. Cut it out.PranaDevil wrote:But to dumb it down for you:
First off, did you not see that I replaced in? So therefore, I WASN'T AROUND when most of that was being discussed? Why are you making a mountain out of a molehill?PranaDevil wrote:That was what I posted originally though, just in a cut down version the first time around, as there was little, to no, reason to point each post out individually, as otherwise I would have simply been linking to his entire post history.
As for not understanding the FF universe, that's fine, however, others have already elaborated on those points, which means it's pointless bringing them up now, unless you haven't read what they were saying.
If it's a summon, then my guess is Bahamut or Typhon.FC Groningen wrote: The "Reduced to nothing"? Any leads on that?
To broad. That would include at least half a dozen players, and that is under a strict definition of "Setup Speculation."WorseExcuse wrote:
AlsoFOS: SETUP SPECULATORS
You overlooked it, I didntdramonic wrote:AND it doesnt solve his potential weaknesses unaffiliated with me.