959: Malth's Alternate Reality: Game Over
-
-
NavyCherub Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 296
- Joined: December 24, 2009
- Location: Virginia
The votes on Mal are probably bolded because there is a tie for most votes and Mal would be lynched if it was deadline right now, since his wagon has existed longest.
Pitt: In 89, why don't you attack Cobalt for doing the same thing (but worse) as Jack? In 93, are you really admitting to preferring that people post fluff...?
Jack, at this point I think you're overreacting way more than UK did.-
-
jasonT1981 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9671
- Joined: June 15, 2009
- Location: Mourne Mountains
-
-
Pittbunny Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 563
- Joined: April 19, 2010
- Location: up da amazon onna rubber duck ^.^
I was more or less OMGUSing Jack, and was kind of ignoring Cobalt's posts as a whole.
And yes, I like that people post fluff. It makes me feel better in that we're not just a bunch of people who A. Overanalyze everything B. Are the village idiots C. Are secretly overanalyzing everything while pretending to be a village idiot.
I understand the whole incentive to grind mafiatheory down to a science, I just don't like the meta-posting implications."Not exactly related to the topic as a whole but what's the deal with putting quotes in your signature that have no relevance to your own life?" - Ythan
Jesters are also Decade's fault. ONORE DECADE!-
-
Pittbunny Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 563
- Joined: April 19, 2010
- Location: up da amazon onna rubber duck ^.^
-
-
Jack Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5460
- Joined: August 13, 2006
-
-
NavyCherub Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 296
- Joined: December 24, 2009
- Location: Virginia
-
-
Jack Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5460
- Joined: August 13, 2006
-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
Do we want to make an attempt at lynching the mod or does anyone else think that just might make a no-lynch? It's good to know that we can vote for him though... I guess.
I'm waiting for Fate to post before I put any serious thought into who might be a good day 1 lynch.
Also, after I get off work today (in about an hour and forty-five minutes) I'll be driving a while to visit family for the weekend. I should still have internet access, but I don't know how often or when I'll be able to get on."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
jasonT1981 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9671
- Joined: June 15, 2009
- Location: Mourne Mountains
-
-
NavyCherub Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 296
- Joined: December 24, 2009
- Location: Virginia
Twomz: no lynching the mod please.
Jack: I specifically called you out because yours seemed suspicious to me, since you were reacting like that to something I don't think was even worth mentioning; it wasn't exactly scummy, and it wasn't hurting the town for UK to respond to a vote with no (clearly stated) reasoning, even if UK responded in a way I don't think was the most pro-town in the world.-
-
UncertainKitten Maid In Japan
- Maid In Japan
- Maid In Japan
- Posts: 6339
- Joined: December 1, 2009
- Location: Virginia
-
-
Pittbunny Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 563
- Joined: April 19, 2010
- Location: up da amazon onna rubber duck ^.^
-
-
UncertainKitten Maid In Japan
- Maid In Japan
- Maid In Japan
- Posts: 6339
- Joined: December 1, 2009
- Location: Virginia
Well, I only know they are wrong in one case ^-^. So, if they are demonstrating wrongness on the one fact I know, I think it's fair to generalize them being wrong in general til they decide to be right ^-^.
And I never get lynched, not til D3 anyway. Would you like to start a wagon on me?"Never have I seen anybody glorify their own lynch."
-StrangerCoug
Internet Mafiais probably never going to happen. You all probably knew that.-
-
Jack Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5460
- Joined: August 13, 2006
So if you are town, if someone accuses you, their opinion is worthless, and it's ok to us whatever scummy tactics you can think of in response?UncertainKitten wrote:Well, it's something I do, Jack ^-^.
Why should I value the opinion of people who are wrong?
There's still a gap here though, where you say you found something suspicious, and then say what it was that you found suspicious, and don't say why you found what it was that you found suspicious, suspicious.NavyCherub wrote:Twomz: no lynching the mod please.
Jack: I specifically called you out because yours seemed suspicious to me, since you were reacting like that to something I don't think was even worth mentioning; it wasn't exactly scummy, and it wasn't hurting the town for UK to respond to a vote with no (clearly stated) reasoning, even if UK responded in a way I don't think was the most pro-town in the world.
I don't think it's relevant that UK wasn't "hurting the town" (no more than it's relevant that it has "negligible benefit for scum" like she brought up). I'm not sure how hurting the town even comes into it, and scum often do things that don't benefit them.
Do you think I'm suspicious because you don't agree with me that UK is suspicious?-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
I was about to remove my random vote and try to find someone who looked scummy enough to get a wagon going on... but I can't refuse a challenge. Who's with me?UncertainKitten wrote:And I never get lynched, not til D3 anyway. Would you like to start a wagon on me?"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
UncertainKitten Maid In Japan
- Maid In Japan
- Maid In Japan
- Posts: 6339
- Joined: December 1, 2009
- Location: Virginia
Define scummy, Jack ^-^
As for scum doing things that don't benefit them, then how am I being scummy?
Please, explain for me how not hurting the town is scummy?
Also,Unvote, Vote Twomz
I love opportunists ^-^.
Why the above was scummy:
Decides to ignore scumminess instead taking a "challenge"
No indication that twomz thinks I'm scum (idk, maybe he thinks it's implied, so maybe he should explain it?)
A subtle "Hey, I can get the town on my side while perpetuating a mislynch" that reeks throughout that post."Never have I seen anybody glorify their own lynch."
-StrangerCoug
Internet Mafiais probably never going to happen. You all probably knew that.-
-
Jack Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5460
- Joined: August 13, 2006
-
-
UncertainKitten Maid In Japan
- Maid In Japan
- Maid In Japan
- Posts: 6339
- Joined: December 1, 2009
- Location: Virginia
Let's see...
I'm thinking...that you are just being a...
*puts on sunglasses*
truculent JACKass
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH~!"Never have I seen anybody glorify their own lynch."
-StrangerCoug
Internet Mafiais probably never going to happen. You all probably knew that.-
-
Cobalt trollface.jpg
- trollface.jpg
- trollface.jpg
- Posts: 2641
- Joined: July 5, 2009
- Location: PA PA PINGAS
-
-
CJMiller heGoonhe
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 553
- Joined: April 1, 2009
- Pronoun: he
- Location: Florida
-
-
NavyCherub Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 296
- Joined: December 24, 2009
- Location: Virginia
It is suspicious because it would be beneficial, as scum, to attack as you did to something that deserves either a small questioning or not much attention at all (at least right now).Jack wrote:There's still a gap here though, where you say you found something suspicious, and then say what it was that you found suspicious, and don't say why you found what it was that you found suspicious, suspicious.
And yeah, it was an attack because you used hot words that didn't really fit the situation, most prominently "youinsistthat cobalt is wrong," to make the post you were referring to look worse than it was. Read UK's post again. Did she reallyinsistanything?
Then what, exactly, is relevant here?I don't think it's relevant that UK wasn't "hurting the town" (no more than it's relevant that it has "negligible benefit for scum" like she brought up). I'm not sure how hurting the town even comes into it, and scum often do things that don't benefit them.
No, I think you're suspicious for the way you went about saying UK was suspicious, not the fact that you think she is suspicious.Do you think I'm suspicious because you don't agree with me that UK is suspicious?
Unvote, vote Jack.-
-
Pittbunny Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 563
- Joined: April 19, 2010
- Location: up da amazon onna rubber duck ^.^
-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
-
-
Cobalt trollface.jpg
- trollface.jpg
- trollface.jpg
- Posts: 2641
- Joined: July 5, 2009
- Location: PA PA PINGAS
-
-
Jack Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5460
- Joined: August 13, 2006
Not particularly. And the beneficial to town/scum (or the "doesn't help town/scum) line isn't very useful.NavyCherub wrote:
It is suspicious because it would be beneficial, as scum, to attack as you did to something that deserves either a small questioning or not much attention at all (at least right now).Jack wrote:There's still a gap here though, where you say you found something suspicious, and then say what it was that you found suspicious, and don't say why you found what it was that you found suspicious, suspicious.
She said cobalt was wrong once again, and that it wasn't surprising because [link to your post about cobalt], implying that cobalt is always wrong. That's pretty strong.And yeah, it was an attack because you used hot words that didn't really fit the situation, most prominently "youinsistthat cobalt is wrong," to make the post you were referring to look worse than it was. Read UK's post again. Did she reallyinsistanything?
You really like the "hurting/beneficial" line huh? Scum are trying to do "beneficial" things remember. What's relevant is my gut. i.e. you have to decide whether someone doing something beneficial is really trying to help the town, or just trying to look like it, and whether someone hurting the town is doing so for scummy reasons, or for one of the many reasons townies do it.
Then what, exactly, is relevant here?I don't think it's relevant that UK wasn't "hurting the town" (no more than it's relevant that it has "negligible benefit for scum" like she brought up). I'm not sure how hurting the town even comes into it, and scum often do things that don't benefit them.
This was your initial reaction to the discussion at hand:
No, I think you're suspicious for the way you went about saying UK was suspicious, not the fact that you think she is suspicious.Do you think I'm suspicious because you don't agree with me that UK is suspicious?
Unvote, vote Jack.
It doesn't sound particularly concerned. It's more of a "oh you two and your arguing" post.Jack, at this point I think you're overreacting way more than UK did.
It seems like you've been working your way up to this vote, which is what scum often do because they don't really suspect the person.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.