ElectricBadger 912 wrote:hp [leaves] wrote:If you can openly conclude that malfunction is the only kill method, you are scum.
hp [leaves] wrote:My role PM implies that malfunctioning and then dying is the only kill method. And the only "kill" that succeeded last night had that kill method. I'm not up for lynching Seacore unless there are two kills the next night.
Joy, we're on Easy Mode.
Ehhhh, Ijji Modo? Kimo~i
That's a nice counterpoint though.
E-Badger 912 wrote:hp was scummy to begin with,
his claim is full of holes, the attempt at WIFOM and evasiveness to explain his play just reeks of scum,
and a lynch will only be riskier nearer endgame (as will a NK). I'm more content with where my vote is at now than before the BP stuff, actually.
I keep saying that the lynch/NK actually isn't as risky as it's made out to be, but whichever.
*Could you please show me the holes in question? (aside from his support for a massclaim)
*Are you referring to VasudeVa's attempt at explaining his behavior as well as his "Haha, WIFOMing the scum" comment?
(Worth noting - the lynch flavor is
also
"malfunctioned and died". Except with more cuppy cakes.)
E-Badger 912 wrote:I'm increasingly convinced otherwise, actually. In retrospect there was nothing indicating I couldn't speak at the start of the day, and having guaranteed claims from all our investigation roles is unlikely.
In all probability there WASN'T any reason you couldn't speak. That's what poisoning is about, nya.
I take it as a natural extension of this that you think Seacore is scum?
What do you think of hp[leaves]+VasudeVa?
---
farside 908 wrote:Everyone seems to want to believe that the poison is the only method and is the "mafia" method. More power to you. I already explain how I can't see that as having a nonkill mafia is not only frustrating to scum it's unbalanced in my view
The Mafia has a kill. It's a poison kill. People
can
actually die from it, etc.
farside 908 wrote:You asked me if I was hammering and stated I should only want a claim if I'm hammering him. So how did I back down from wanting a claim?
This is kind of simple.
*If you ask for a claim, you want to hammer. This is both/and.
*You asked for a claim.
*You didn't want to hammer.
farside 908 wrote:I said I would look at the 3 but if I don't believe in hammering someone because of my own views why push it then?
I'm not sure what you're asking, but I'll spin it like this--why ask someone to claim when you DON'T have any intention of hammering them?
farside 908 wrote:I also don't see why Seacore is getting town cred from his blant vote hopping and lack of views on why he finds anyone scum.
I don't think anyone is giving him Town credit per se.
---
@mod: Please send the Prod Unicorn to haunt dramonic's nightmares
---
@Seacore: So now there are wagons on Socrates, VasudeVa, hp[leaves], and yourself.
You've expressed an interest in lynching all of the first three. Do you like the one you're on now, specifically? Why?
Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.