Werewolf: Wisborg Asylum: GAME OVER, Innocents Win.

[xRECKONERx]

Unvote; Vote: The Goat

*makes out with Kise*

Kise hit the nail on the head.

[ReaperCharlie]

ReaperCharlie, this is an official warning for PMing a player whom your role did not allow for. As the PM that was forwarded to me contained no game-related discussion, this

is

just a warning. Any further rule breaches will result in much harsher punishment.

inHimshallibe, FC Groningen and danakillsu have all failed to pick up their role PMs, and as such are being replaced.

WTF? As long as it's not game-related, who cares? I am in games with like 70-90 people right now, does that mean I can not PM any of them?

P.S. The snitch better not be animorpher... that'd be last time I help you out with MS news, lol

[lukepukeduke]

Hello,

I am here...

I will be reading over the past 9 pages and posting some stuff..

Any questions for me, ask.

[ReaperCharlie]

Ok, just finished a skim-over. Boy am I glad I was gone over the weekend. Looks like we have not one, but about FIVE jesters. FFS

And I'm still pissed-ish at my BS 'official warning', but KoC is apparently taking this game very seriously. Just like all of the players [/sarcasm]




So.... since we're all role-claiming anyways, I'm the

Half-Wit Cyborg

, an intelligent AI-implanted human/machine with a dual personality. I have no special day powers except extreme intelligence and dry humor. My role PM says I have one night-visit ability, which allows me to visit my polyscientist creator every other night (even nights) with the purpose of stealing cookies from her pantry. If you are wondering, the answer is yes, I was allowed to act on Night Zero.

The robot in me wants to vote Reck and Crypto, but so far the human in me wants to vote Kise and Fate. More suggestions please, and reasons why I should or shouldn't vote for each of them.

[dramonic]

We... arent claiming yet...
Or I missed the train?

[Merkabah]

Someone asked about why we thought that Chrono was scummy:

Four votes in the first five posts of Chrono is scummy (including a vote of Fate then following Fate onto Kise.

ISO 5 really pinged my scumdar: Chrono listed two options describing xRx's play: town that is creating an easy target (feels like a warning to scumbuddies) or a JESTER. Chrono doesn't say that xRx could be scum (guess why not. Hint: Chrono is scum and xRx isn't with him)

Follow that up with ISO 9 where he says to lynch xRx (despite the town/jester "read" on him) and you have a pretty good case that he's scum (and rhcpfreak is with Chrono, kudos to whoever voted for that guy).

Chrono still is keeping all options open for xRx in 11, giving all options even though he's said he basically believes xRx to be non-scum in 9; while still slight pushing for xRx to be lynched REGARDLESS OF WHAT XRX IS.

This is all scum behavior, not town. With the setup being 99.9% "unbreakable" (check the rules) I only have to assume that scum have fake-claims or access to a town role PM in one form or another.

[Fate]

So.... since we're all role-claiming anyways,

?

[xRECKONERx]

What the fuck, ReaperCharlie.

Also, that role sounds particularly not pro-town.

RC = third party. Good to know. But his wincon doesn't contradict town's wincon, so he's not particularly dangerous. We should lynch The Goat. Though Merk makes a good case against Chrono.

[Chronopie]

Nice misrep Merk.

#5 was a 'to scummy to be scum' view on recks play

followed by 'I don't want to put up with his shit'

but nice effort to set up a mislynch.

unvote, vote:Merkabah

[lukepukeduke]

cool

Vote: Sucrose

.

What made you vote so quickly on this person?

Actually, I'm 98% sure Kise is scum.

Why is that?

Vote: Kise

Definitely not innocent.

Is that because Reckoner said so or do you have a reason also... Or do yall have the same reason somehow

Vote: Deer

He knows why.

Can we know why??

unvote

Vote: Chronpie

He also knows why.

Can we know why?

Vote: Nightson

: Scum-bandwagoner.

Caught:

Day one: page one: post 5 + post 22

Over & out.

Good Point....

But you could be just trying to get these people off of you and on to him

unvote

Vote: Lowell

Not sure why. But he probably knows. Ask him.

Why can you never give us any reasons?

vote:Shattered Viewpoint

just because

Reason?

I have one you can use: It is because he voted one of your scum buddies?

If you are scum

Test over.

Unvote. Vote: Chronopie.

I think I've found scum, guys.

Can you tell us any evidence of him being scum?

How have you found him?

Unvote, Vote: crypto

Good enough for me.

Lol OMGUS'ing?

What's wrong with my name?

Vote: easjo

and more should be voting him as well.

Why is that?

HI DRY-FIT!

WANNA VOTE CHRONOPIE WITH ME?

Why do you want Chronopie out so bad?

Yeah, I'm SK, and the asylum has driven me insane, but crypto is the only person I trust so I can recruit him to my side and we go through the game as dual SKs then must turn on each other in a game of chance at the end to decide who wins.

Pretty ingenious mechanic actually.

Do you think it was smart to claim SK?

[Merkabah]

Nice misrep Merk.

#5 was a 'to scummy to be scum' view on recks play

followed by 'I don't want to put up with his shit'

but nice effort to set up a mislynch.

unvote, vote:Merkabah

Yay, moar omgus.

Anyways: if he's still too scummy to be scum, why did you want to lynch him in ISO 9? Because you have a town read on him but he's spewing shit? If that's the case, ignore him. However, you wanted to lynch him anyways.

You're not part of this town.
You're not a mislynch.

[Chronopie]

When I flip, take a good hard look at this cat (provided that I die before him). I already claimed this games equivalent to VT, in case you didn't pick up on it. which btw, wasn't included in the OP.

As I said, I wasn't happy having to wade though piles of shit to find a piece of content.
So yes, I wanted to lynch him to make it stop. Kapeesh?

[animorpherv1]

Ani and chrono, on a scale of 1-10, how serious do you think Reck was being that he's in an SK duo?

5 or 6. I think there's a hint of truth to it, but hes not telling the full truth.

@Nightson:

Yes.

unvote, vote crypto

[lukepukeduke]

If I quoted you and asked you a question could you please answer it

[Shattered Viewpoint]

@lukepukeduke:

Tell me what you understand about the Random Voting Stage. (Hint: The answer is in the title.)

[crypto]

Ani and chrono, on a scale of 1-10, how serious do you think Reck was being that he's in an SK duo?

5 or 6. I think there's a hint of truth to it, but hes not telling the full truth.

@Nightson:

Yes.

unvote, vote crypto

How does claiming scum further Reck's evil scum agenda?

[animorpherv1]

Ani and chrono, on a scale of 1-10, how serious do you think Reck was being that he's in an SK duo?

5 or 6. I think there's a hint of truth to it, but hes not telling the full truth.

@Nightson:

Yes.

unvote, vote crypto

How does claiming scum further Reck's evil scum agenda?

If your unlynchable, then Reck is telling the truth, and we lynch him tomorrow. I'm not going to Reck straight away because I think he is twisting it around (which means your unkillable and HE's unlynchable).

[ReaperCharlie]

Ani and chrono, on a scale of 1-10, how serious do you think Reck was being that he's in an SK duo?

5 or 6. I think there's a hint of truth to it, but hes not telling the full truth.

@Nightson: Yes.

unvote, vote crypto

How does claiming scum further Reck's evil scum agenda?

Short answer: It doesn't.
Long answer: It doesn't. (Insert WIFOM here)

[crypto]

Ani and chrono, on a scale of 1-10, how serious do you think Reck was being that he's in an SK duo?

5 or 6. I think there's a hint of truth to it, but hes not telling the full truth.

@Nightson:

Yes.

unvote, vote crypto

How does claiming scum further Reck's evil scum agenda?

If your unlynchable, then Reck is telling the truth, and we lynch him tomorrow. I'm not going to Reck straight away because I think he is twisting it around (which means your unkillable and HE's unlynchable).

How does claiming scum further Reck's evil scum agenda?

[easjo682]

vote:Shattered Viewpoint

just because

Reason?

I have one you can use: It is because he voted one of your scum buddies?

If you are scum

Because I was laying down a RVS (Random voting stage) vote I had no arbitrary reason so I said just because.

[Dry-fit]

That's a lot of nothing from ReaperCharlie after a full reread. Don't wait for others to scumhunt for you.

@Crypto
Yes, it's serious. Now respond, please.

Dry-ft should explain how selfvoting is a sign for scum and how Jack was rolefishing according to him.
P.S. Dry, did you read every page before posting post 110?

Self-voting isn't really scummy but from what Jack said in the signup thread and the way he's played so far it looks like he might be trying to play the newbie card, and self-voting could help him do that.

As for the rolefishing whenever a player seems extra intersted in other players' roles it catches my eye. In this case though his explanation makes sense so I don't see what he did as scummy anymore.

I read the whole thread before writing post 110.

Deer is looking worse and worse to me. First a really weird reaction to crypto in post He apologizes for rolefishing even though he clearly wasn't and votes Chronopie. Other stuff:

Wait, Jackalope's self-voting? vote: jackalope

Looks like a very insincere vote.

Yeah, what? let's lynch Reckoner and prevent this from happening.

A bad reason to push the Reck wagon and sounds really forced.

Hadn't thought about a jester. Could be a possibility for sure.

one-line posts are not a scumtell, kay?

and last time I checked, it wasn't like you had done anything at
all, easjo...

Really defensive.

unvote. Vote: Deer

[xRECKONERx]

So some

people

VIs still believe my SK claim.

[animorpherv1]

Ani and chrono, on a scale of 1-10, how serious do you think Reck was being that he's in an SK duo?

5 or 6. I think there's a hint of truth to it, but hes not telling the full truth.

@Nightson:

Yes.

unvote, vote crypto

How does claiming scum further Reck's evil scum agenda?

If your unlynchable, then Reck is telling the truth, and we lynch him tomorrow. I'm not going to Reck straight away because I think he is twisting it around (which means your unkillable and HE's unlynchable).

How does claiming scum further Reck's evil scum agenda?

I never claimed it would help Reck.

[crypto]

So your theory is that Reck-scum wants to out himself and lose the game.

[animorpherv1]

So your theory is that Reck-scum wants to out himself and lose the game.

How would I know if somethingf happens to Reck after we lynch you? Heck, Reck could be a lyncher, or a jester. IDK. I'm taking a stab that he doesn't end the day if he is, though.