*makes out with Kise*
Kise hit the nail on the head.
WTF? As long as it's not game-related, who cares? I am in games with like 70-90 people right now, does that mean I can not PM any of them?Knight of Cydonia wrote:ReaperCharlie, this is an official warning for PMing a player whom your role did not allow for. As the PM that was forwarded to me contained no game-related discussion, thisisjust a warning. Any further rule breaches will result in much harsher punishment.
inHimshallibe, FC Groningen and danakillsu have all failed to pick up their role PMs, and as such are being replaced.
.dramonic wrote:cool
Vote: Sucrose
Why is that?xRECKONERx wrote:Actually, I'm 98% sure Kise is scum.
Is that because Reckoner said so or do you have a reason also... Or do yall have the same reason somehowFate wrote:Vote: Kise
Definitely not innocent.
Can we know why??Shattered Viewpoint wrote:Vote: Deer
He knows why.
Can we know why?Shattered Viewpoint wrote:unvote
Vote: Chronpie
He also knows why.
Good Point....Kise wrote:Vote: Nightson: Scum-bandwagoner.
Caught:Day one: page one: post 5 + post 22
Over & out.
Why can you never give us any reasons?Shattered Viewpoint wrote:unvote
Vote: Lowell
Not sure why. But he probably knows. Ask him.
Reason?easjo682 wrote:vote:Shattered Viewpoint
just because
Can you tell us any evidence of him being scum?crypto wrote:Test over.Unvote. Vote: Chronopie.I think I've found scum, guys.
Lol OMGUS'ing?Chronopie wrote:Unvote, Vote: cryptoGood enough for me.
Why is that?My Milked Eek wrote:What's wrong with my name?
Vote: easjoand more should be voting him as well.
Why do you want Chronopie out so bad?crypto wrote:HI DRY-FIT!
WANNA VOTE CHRONOPIE WITH ME?
Do you think it was smart to claim SK?xRECKONERx wrote:Yeah, I'm SK, and the asylum has driven me insane, but crypto is the only person I trust so I can recruit him to my side and we go through the game as dual SKs then must turn on each other in a game of chance at the end to decide who wins.
Pretty ingenious mechanic actually.
Yay, moar omgus.Chronopie wrote:Nice misrep Merk.
#5 was a 'to scummy to be scum' view on recks play
followed by 'I don't want to put up with his shit'
but nice effort to set up a mislynch.
unvote, vote:Merkabah
5 or 6. I think there's a hint of truth to it, but hes not telling the full truth.Merkabah wrote:Ani and chrono, on a scale of 1-10, how serious do you think Reck was being that he's in an SK duo?
How does claiming scum further Reck's evil scum agenda?animorpherv1 wrote:5 or 6. I think there's a hint of truth to it, but hes not telling the full truth.Merkabah wrote:Ani and chrono, on a scale of 1-10, how serious do you think Reck was being that he's in an SK duo?
@Nightson:
Yes.unvote, vote crypto
If your unlynchable, then Reck is telling the truth, and we lynch him tomorrow. I'm not going to Reck straight away because I think he is twisting it around (which means your unkillable and HE's unlynchable).crypto wrote:How does claiming scum further Reck's evil scum agenda?animorpherv1 wrote:5 or 6. I think there's a hint of truth to it, but hes not telling the full truth.Merkabah wrote:Ani and chrono, on a scale of 1-10, how serious do you think Reck was being that he's in an SK duo?
@Nightson:
Yes.unvote, vote crypto
Short answer: It doesn't.crypto wrote:How does claiming scum further Reck's evil scum agenda?animorpherv1 wrote:5 or 6. I think there's a hint of truth to it, but hes not telling the full truth.Merkabah wrote:Ani and chrono, on a scale of 1-10, how serious do you think Reck was being that he's in an SK duo?
@Nightson: Yes.unvote, vote crypto
How does claiming scum further Reck's evil scum agenda?animorpherv1 wrote:If your unlynchable, then Reck is telling the truth, and we lynch him tomorrow. I'm not going to Reck straight away because I think he is twisting it around (which means your unkillable and HE's unlynchable).crypto wrote:How does claiming scum further Reck's evil scum agenda?animorpherv1 wrote:5 or 6. I think there's a hint of truth to it, but hes not telling the full truth.Merkabah wrote:Ani and chrono, on a scale of 1-10, how serious do you think Reck was being that he's in an SK duo?
@Nightson:
Yes.unvote, vote crypto
lukepukeduke wrote:Reason?easjo682 wrote:vote:Shattered Viewpoint
just because
I have one you can use: It is because he voted one of your scum buddies?
If you are scum
Self-voting isn't really scummy but from what Jack said in the signup thread and the way he's played so far it looks like he might be trying to play the newbie card, and self-voting could help him do that.ZazieR wrote:@Crypto
Yes, it's serious. Now respond, please.
Dry-ft should explain how selfvoting is a sign for scum and how Jack was rolefishing according to him.
P.S. Dry, did you read every page before posting post 110?
Looks like a very insincere vote.Deer wrote:Wait, Jackalope's self-voting? vote: jackalope
A bad reason to push the Reck wagon and sounds really forced.Deer wrote:Yeah, what? let's lynch Reckoner and prevent this from happening.
Deer wrote:Hadn't thought about a jester. Could be a possibility for sure.
Really defensive.Deer wrote:one-line posts are not a scumtell, kay?
and last time I checked, it wasn't like you had done anything at
all, easjo...
I never claimed it would help Reck.crypto wrote:How does claiming scum further Reck's evil scum agenda?animorpherv1 wrote:If your unlynchable, then Reck is telling the truth, and we lynch him tomorrow. I'm not going to Reck straight away because I think he is twisting it around (which means your unkillable and HE's unlynchable).crypto wrote:How does claiming scum further Reck's evil scum agenda?animorpherv1 wrote:5 or 6. I think there's a hint of truth to it, but hes not telling the full truth.Merkabah wrote:Ani and chrono, on a scale of 1-10, how serious do you think Reck was being that he's in an SK duo?
@Nightson:
Yes.unvote, vote crypto
How would I know if somethingf happens to Reck after we lynch you? Heck, Reck could be a lyncher, or a jester. IDK. I'm taking a stab that he doesn't end the day if he is, though.crypto wrote:So your theory is that Reck-scum wants to out himself and lose the game.