# Oh,
Speaking about his posts, can you find a common theme?
Alta wrote:@ThatTumbleweed
I don't think there is enough evidence to really go after remouk at this point.It just doesn't seem very weird to me for him to not be sure about anything. If he is Town then he wouldn't have any idea about who is scum and who isn't
Alta wrote:@LordChronos
Yeah, I was thinking about that, however my vote was just random while ThatTumbleweed's vote was a far more serious accusation.Anyway I guess that Remouk's actions are pretty suspicious but I don't know if I would consider them enough to lynch him.
Alta wrote:Sorry for not posting in so long. I've been busy but i'll try to post more oftean.
Anyway I currently don't really know who is scum.Everyone is a little bit suspicious but a prime suspect to me is remouk. However despite his scummy behavior I am not convinved he is Mafia.I think that right now the best thing we can do is keep discussing.
I mean God, one would be hard-pressed to make so many posts stating the same thing over and over. Lot of things happened since he has first posted, lots of arguments and accusations being thrown around, yet he dogmatically restates this single opinion without commenting on any of those! And is it me or is Alta wording his posts in a way that his suspicion toward remouk seem to be increasing progressively (from "not enough evidence" -> "somewhat suspicious" -> "prime suspect ... not convinced he is Mafia" -> "always found Remouk scummy") though from his last post suggests that he found remouk always scummy? Doesn't matter at all though; he never forgets to add that there are insuefficient evidence in what I suppose is piss-poor attempt to rid himself of responsibility when remouk lynch goes wrong.Alta wrote:@Incognito
Nothing's changed I always found Remouk scummy I just don't think that his actions are enough to condemn him.
# I am getting normal Townie vibes from
remouk, regards to
it depends on the content. I think when 'good' scum does something that is suspicious, there must be something in that action that results in equally beneficial pay-off to the scum side. Why I find Incognito's Earlder1 vote suspicious is because that, well, there was nothing much to be gained. No one was going to gather and lynch Earlder1 because two unexplained votes were placed upon him (or at least I have that much faith in the town). How much that unexplained vote increases likelihood of the target being lynched is pretty good indication of it's scumminess. Hell, I had two separate games off-Mafiascum where someone just randomly voted, and one case turned out to be Cop and another case turned out to be trap set by masons to draw out scum.Anyway, I do think that a non-explained vote is scummy (even if good town player already did it), because it's far easier to explain a vote after everyone talked about it, than before. And you can always use the "I wanted to put pressure on him" backdoor.
# I'll complete my analysis of
#
The Earlder1's accusation against me consists of three points:Earlder1 wrote:brianj- I'm a bit weary about his play. As I'm sure will be agreed with, I was an easy target because my mistaken comments. In post 103, he also seems to be trying a bit hard to appease everybody. He says he agrees with both sides and fails to really have an opinion on anyone but myself. I'd like to see some more content from him, but for now he reads slightly scummy.
1) Voting for an easy target.
2) Agreeing with both sides; I assume remouk and Incognito.
3) Fails to have an opinion on anyone but myself.
* This is the post in question.
Note the timing of the vote. There was still not an significant accusation present yet, and I had been the one to post thisbrianj wrote:OMG Earlder1 scum.
Unvote, Vote: Earlder1
* I fail to understand which part of my post shows me supporting remouk. In post #103 I clearly state that there was no anti-town intent on Incognito's vote, which refutes the very meat of remouk's accusation itself. I did speak positively about remouk, but after rereading it should be clear that I was happy about remouk coming out of his hiatus to take serious stance, not upon the validity of remouk's argument itself. Also can you give me examples on where I try to appease everybody? I truly have no idea about this.
* You apparently missed my opinion toward you, and this.
One more thing:
Earlder1 (3) - brianj, Incognito, LordChronos
Earlder1 wrote:[So in recap, I have prepared the following list in terms of how scummy I think everyone is, 1 being most scummy.
1. Brianj
2. Lord Chronos
2. Alta
2. Remouk
5. Incog
Do I smell an OMGUS? Either way my opinion on him still stands.
Those five are the individuals I have the strongest opinion about, I'll analyze remaining players (LordChronos, Coach Travis, ThatTumbleweed) later on. Actually I found them all personally unremarkable, but who knows what I can drag up when I actually start looking.
I think Earlder1 is likely to be scum, but I feel mafia much strongly from Alta's current behaviour, so: