With nine players alive, five votes are required to lynch.
Deadline falls on Saturday June 5 at 17:14 UTC.
Well, if a person was acting incredibly anti-town, wouldn't you at that point begin to consider that maybe just maybe that person might be scum? Just curious.Post 182, LordChronos wrote:There are some situations where you have an incredibly anti-town player that is likely to do things that drastically hurt the town's chances to win and you know this early in the game when I would support a policy lynch.
Can you explain this a bit further? How would a bandwagon that forms after you place a vote backfire on you?Post 192, Coach Travis wrote:I don't know, I've just always been slow to vote outside of RVS, like I'm afraid it could cause some bandwagon and backfire on me or something.
No I was referring to CT's incredibly wishy-washy post here.Incognto wrote:Shadow Dancer, is your post #178 directed at me? I couldn't tell cuz the post you ended up linking to was your very own post.
It definitely is a very helpful concept, though mostly for D1. Basically it's the "role" Earl had in farside's game. It made him both number one mafia and doctor target for N1, eventually preventing a night kill early in the game. Though that does not neccesarily happen, it makes mafia play foir N1 more predictable and thus easier preventable (if there's a doc) and evaluatable (is that a word?).brianj wrote:To be honest I don't like the idea of "towniest" townie.
I had no clue and that's why I asked haha. Since you made that post directly after I announced I would be V/LA, I thought you were directing it at me. That's why I was confused because I thought I always made my stance on Earlder1 extremely clear but your post (if directed at me) seemed to indicate that you thought otherwise.Post 205, Shadow Dancer wrote:Which of your posts were you thinking I referred to?
I could go for either a him-lynch or a smashbro-lynch right now since I think they both have the highest chance of being scum but since Earlder1 has the largest wagon, I'm fine with lynching him for Today instead of shifting the wagon to someone completely new.Post 205, Shadow Dancer wrote:And what is your reasoning for the hammer? I know Earl has been your top suspect for a while now, but IMO there is still a fine line between suspecting some one and being willing to lynch that one.
Nikanor wrote:ThatTumblweed has requested replacement.
I do have some opinions of who is very townie, which I'll leave out, because I usually don't like to put that out there.Incognito wrote:smashbro: Do you have any additional thoughts about anyone else? Your initial analysis made it seem to me like you were slightly suspicious of Shadow Dancer/Alta and very suspicious of Lord Chronos but now that you've unvoted, I'm not entirely sure who your top suspect is at the moment. What do you think of Earlder1?
What reason do you not have for voting him, if this is a scummy read for you?remouk wrote:I have a bad feeling about Shadow Dancer, but I can't explain it. Maybe because he looks so confident. I'm tempted to vote against him.
He has stayed relatively quiet throughout the game, and aside from his case on Incognito, he has given little information about who he finds scummy. I'm looking to see more from him.LordChronos wrote:@smashbro
That is the first time you have mentioned remouk, could you elaborate on why you find him scummy?