Yosarian2 wrote:In both that game, and in this game, I said that scum will sometimes quickhammer in a vengeful game, because the will. In both games, I said that people should be careful at putting people at lynch -1 without a good reason, like you just quoted.
Oh, but there is a difference. The difference is in the point of the message.
The reason why you stated that we should be careful with our random votes in this game was to 'warn' us.
But in your previous game, it's not. There, it's Hoopla who posts the 'warning'. You on the other hand state that quicklynching isn't that bad as we'd still have our vengefull kill if a townie gets lynched.
But your responses are very interesting.
-You called our vote almost absurdly anti-town, instead of scummy. Is scummy and anti-town the same to you? Because if it is, I'd like to hear why as I think the difference is very clear.
-True, Ditto didn't explain why there's a difference between this game and Open 158 in the way you behave. However, that was the other player. I was the one who voted you for the reason stated. Haylen was making it clear that she didn't vote you. She couldn't explain it. Did you really not know that I voted you and not Haylen?
-And last, wasn't it you who stated that without aggressive voting, we probably won't lynch scum? Seems you disagree with that in this game, though.
Also, don't AtE me. It's not gonna work.
@Nopoint
It's not meta. Meta is based upon playstyle. Yosarian2 acts differently based upon the subject of quicklynches. In Open 158 he's more 'relaxed' about it than that he's in this game.