Cereal Killers - Mini 1027 (Game Over)
-
-
XScorpion Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: August 15, 2009
-
-
xvart Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2829
- Joined: September 11, 2009
- Location: Missouri
Responses from page 7:
Sorry, I misread their back and forth. They were talking about Sawyer's vote on me. And the back and forth was basically both of them saying they didn't know why he was voting me, and XScorp responded with what I assume he dug out of the thread.Super Smash Bros. Fan, 157 wrote:
1. Because your declaration that you would vote Kirbyoshi has been talked about a lot and he should know at least that.xvart wrote:Because I don't see how answering an question about someone else's vote is a really solid parrotting scumtell. First of all, why is XScorp responsible for knowing the details of my vote and how can he possibly be scummy for not knowing? How else is he supposed to provide an answer to the question except use the context of the game?
I agree that not reading the thread is anti-town, but not necessarily scummy. I think there's been a couple people say the same thing (but I might be mixing a couple games now).Super Smash Bros. Fan, 157 wrote:2. It means that he was not reading the thread, which is known to be scummy.
Yeah, that was my point above (except for the wrong vote in question). He was asked to justify a vote by someone else. XScorp asked Charter why Sawyer's vote was bad (as Charter said); Charter responded that he didn't know why he was voting for me and then asked XScorp if he knew why Sawyer was voting for me; XScorp responded: "I dunno, because Xvart said he would vote for Kirby if Kirby's daykill was fake? That seems like the right reason.". That isn't parrotting in my opinion, which was the original quote in question when parrotting was raised.Super Smash Bros. Fan, 157 wrote:3. This is a very good question. Right now, tbh, I haven't been able to formulate a decent answer to this question as I have no clue how to answer this. If I can ever answer it decently, I will immediately get back to you on this.
I'll go back and reread him to see if it sounds genuine to me; but my initial response is that I feel like the attacks on him are much more contrived.Super Smash Bros. Fan, 157 wrote:
By weak defense, I meant that his defense doesn't really look genuine to me, not to mention he continues to be scummy while defending himself IMO.xvart wrote:re: weak defence - I don't really think that having a weak defense of oneself is necessarily a scumtell either; not everyone is good at defending himself and I don't think that indicates alignment; especially when the cases are weak (in my opinion) to begin with.
I think you're getting your reads mixed up (which is understandable since you really never justify anything) but now XScorp is the active lurker? He has 11 more posts than you do. I've also noticed that you have continued to not explain any of your reads when asked. Is there some reason other than the obvious?charter, 159 wrote:Lurkers: Confid, Zang
Active Lurkers: XScorp
Why is he so obviously town? Please enlighten me because I have a fairly neutral read on him. I also like you didn't answer Jenni when she asked you, but to give you the benefit of the doubt I'll just assume you missed it. I'm guessing hiphop will probably switch his vote to you since not answering questions is the "first sign of being scum." But maybe that is only non-game related questions?charter, 170 wrote:Spyrex is so obviously town, every time you try and call him scum I just get 100% more sure you are scum.
At the time of your question, I probably would have said hiphop; but now I would definitely say hiphop with his recent attempts to undermine me by misconstruing and truncating my posts to make it look like I'm not answering his questions. The evidence in my previous post where he tailored our quotes to his accusation is especially damning.XScorpion, 162 wrote:@xvert: Who is your number 2 read?
xvart.I only read quote walls.
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"-
-
jenniwren Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 486
- Joined: July 16, 2010
- Location: Sevenwaters
XScorpion: First, off the record/out of game/whatever passes for being unofficial communication...you brought up what I said about you in earlier posts, and the way you addressed it with Robo made me feel as though you were personally offended. I felt bad about the way I said what I did when I reread that post later, and SSBF already sort of called me out about it and defended you in post #127, but I didn't know how to address it in game since no one seems to be able to say anything and be taken at face value; however, since you brought it up, I am going to address it. Anyway, I’m sorry if I offended you personally with any thoughtless comments I have made. It's not an excuse, but I was caught up in the moment in which I was writing and was maybe a little—or a lot—meaner than I should have been. That’s not in keeping with the spirit of the game, and I apologize to you and anyone else who may have been personally offended by anything I have said; that was not my intention at all.
On the record/back in game/etc:
I do feel that the underlying issues of what I posted about you and Robo have some validity, and that bringing them up and pointing them out is justified. This time, however, I will attempt to address them with maybe a little more explanation and a little less venom.
The crux of what was meant in the earlier post is basically this:
I am not convinced you are scum, but I do think you've definitely done some pretty anti-town things so far.
If you two aren’t scum and you don’t think that the little back and forth you have had going with Robo this entire time hasn’t marked you as a target for mislynch by scum then you might want to think again. If you don’t think doing something like rolefishing will set you up for trouble, then you also need to think again. I don’t want to read through all your personal history with Robo; you two should take that up elsewhere because it isn't useful to this game and the town win-con at all. You are both experienced players, so you should know better than to drag your dirty laundry through this game when it has nothing to do with this game.
That being said, I don't think that stuff necessarily makes you scum, and I think there are some others far scummier than you, which is why I am not voting for one of you.
Hiphop
I can’t be offended by the truth. I'd rather not use that crutch, though. Also, don't discredit newbies too much. For all our faults, one thing we have going for us is fresh perspective.hiphop wrote:I find jenni to be newb (if that offends you sorry) who is still learning how to play.Has she a name? / She reminds me of a small bird, perhaps a jenny wren. / An owl perhaps, that speaks only when the rest of the world sleeps. / Jenny will do well enough. ~Juliet Marillier,Daughter of the Forest~-
-
bouncy.bouncy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 311
- Joined: January 19, 2010
- Location: Louisiana
Fixing hiphop's vote.
VOTE COUNT7 to lynch
Xscorpion (5) Super Smash Bros. Fan, charter, SpyreX, Kirbyoshi, Sawyer
charter (2) xvart, jenniwren
xvart (1) hiphop
Robocopter87 (1) Xscorpion
Not voting (3) [Robocopter87] ConfidAnon, ZangMostly Mountainous is in progress http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=15655-
-
Robocopter87 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7735
- Joined: December 18, 2009
- Location: Yes
If I had a vote on XScorp I would unvote, lets NOT lynch him today please.
His one post flipped my whole read upside down.
Xscorp, which post of hiphops were you referring to?
There was two or three on the last page, can you give me a post number?Although the border between madness and genius is very narrow.
"I am so totally obsessed with you. You caught me." - Tracy-
-
XScorpion Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: August 15, 2009
-
-
Robocopter87 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7735
- Joined: December 18, 2009
- Location: Yes
Its actually a little scummy. But really I am going to say its null for me. Why?Although the border between madness and genius is very narrow.
"I am so totally obsessed with you. You caught me." - Tracy-
-
XScorpion Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: August 15, 2009
-
-
Robocopter87 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7735
- Joined: December 18, 2009
- Location: Yes
I don't really know what your getting at Xscorp. I think that he is right in the fact that we are no different. He kinda talked about us then went to Kirby's daykill thing and then came back to us. This is pretty null to me.hiphop wrote:Except for the xscorpion rolefishing, there would be nothing that separates xscorpion-scum from robo-scum, and I really do not like all the noise they are pushing. In fact now that I think about it I really do not think the rolefishing was so bad. Look at it this way-kirby fake vigs, the mod writes the flavor. Now based off what other people said it looked like people believed that kirby was actually a vig after the flavor, but were not quite sure. Now if that were the case the fake-vig can be looked at as a real vig. And if he is a real vig, then he just breadcrumbed his role. Now I am not an expert on breadcrumbing, but i believe it is supposed to be like an actual claim, but not quite. But being that is was so blatant, then it was an actual claim. Confirm claim anyone? And being that he asked before kirby verified the kill was a fake makes it not scummy compared to scummy if he did afterwards. So the way i look at it xscorp and robo are just noise so far. What is the difference between the 2?Although the border between madness and genius is very narrow.
"I am so totally obsessed with you. You caught me." - Tracy-
-
XScorpion Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: August 15, 2009
-
-
Robocopter87 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7735
- Joined: December 18, 2009
- Location: Yes
Because I laid out my case before you did. I actually took the time to explain my vote. But it took me a while, like it did you. i don't think anyone has read your case yet. And I don't feel that this wagon on you is good.
I want to spotlight Zang for a second,
COME OUT ZANG!!!!!1111Although the border between madness and genius is very narrow.
"I am so totally obsessed with you. You caught me." - Tracy-
-
XScorpion Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: August 15, 2009
-
-
Robocopter87 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7735
- Joined: December 18, 2009
- Location: Yes
Well, you were pretty scummy I guess.
I don't know the reason.Although the border between madness and genius is very narrow.
"I am so totally obsessed with you. You caught me." - Tracy-
-
XScorpion Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: August 15, 2009
-
-
Robocopter87 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7735
- Joined: December 18, 2009
- Location: Yes
Its a decent case. I don't have anything to respond to.Although the border between madness and genius is very narrow.
"I am so totally obsessed with you. You caught me." - Tracy-
-
Robocopter87 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7735
- Joined: December 18, 2009
- Location: Yes
Oh, and maybe because I have dropped the hint that I would be better off NK'ed than Lynched.Although the border between madness and genius is very narrow.
"I am so totally obsessed with you. You caught me." - Tracy-
-
charter Beware of Dog
- Beware of Dog
- Beware of Dog
- Posts: 9261
- Joined: July 12, 2007
- Location: Virginia
-
-
Robocopter87 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7735
- Joined: December 18, 2009
- Location: Yes
Bully.Although the border between madness and genius is very narrow.
"I am so totally obsessed with you. You caught me." - Tracy-
-
xvart Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2829
- Joined: September 11, 2009
- Location: Missouri
Quote wall ahead. I typically don't really like PBPA but thought it was important to consolodate scummy behavior of charter in one place. I don't comment on every post of his so I implore you to do your own ISO/full reread for the full scope/double check to make sure I am not misrepresenting him. For you lazy readers, tl;dr version at bottom, but context is excluded.
Suggestion that "we" should lynch robo when he is not voting robo. Could be argued to be a joke, except for the follow up questions and justification for asking the question later in the game.charter, ISO 2 wrote:Wait, I just noticed Robocopter voted for himself. We should lynch him to punish this behavior, OR MAYBE DAYKILL HIM HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA.
The implication that there was something wrong with not commenting on it (therefore scummy) to SSBF, XScorp, hiphop, Kirby, Sawyer, and me for not commenting on the self vote.charter, ISO 3 wrote:SSBF, xvart, Xscorpion, hiphop, Kirbyoshi, and Sawyer. Why did none of you comment on how Robocopter voted himself?
Robocopter, why shouldn't we lynch you right now?
Solid scum read on XScorp and a solid three town reads on unknown people. No justification for any of it. Says everyone else is making it difficult for him to identify the rest of the scum buddies (although Sawyer apparently is scum independent of XScorp). Also identifies SSBF as probable scum. Overall, terribly scummy post.charter, ISO 4 wrote:Guys, I am 99% sure that XScorpion is scum. I've already identified three townies. The rest of you are making this very difficult to figure out who his buddies are (except Sawyer, who is making it very easy to see he is scum).
Actually, it's probably SSBF with his whole "There is definently an overreaction to Kirbyoshi's fake daykill attempt. I knew this wasn't serious, so I saw no point in making a negative reaction to it." speech.
XScorpion, Sawyer, and SSBF, what is your opinion of the other two?
I italicized a flawed argument in the quote. You can not unilaterally claim that scum "wait and see what happens" while townies "make things happen." In an ideal utopia, this may be correct; but it hardly has any basis in reality. Just because it supports your argument does not make it true. Also questions XScorp under the pretext that Sawyer is scummy.charter, ISO 6 wrote:Your whole "vote Robo and see what happens idea" is inherently scummy in nature, and as such, I believe (quite strongly by this point) that you are scum.Scum "wait and see what happens" whereas townies "make stuff happen".Plus, your timing of it was bad, how you posted some, then did some RVSing. Then, the degree that you're pushing the idea (of which nobody seems to have much interest in following) I find pretty bad.
What about Sawyer do you like? His active lurking, his deflecting questions, his poor voting, or something else?
How is SSBF behaving consistent with his town meta? You didn't really give an opinion on him, I would still like one.
I'm not voting Robo because I don't think he's scum.
It is also interesting how he when he explains his reasoning on voting XScorp he says "[he] believe(quite strongly at this point) implying that since his 99% claim his scum read on XScorp has increased. What happened between these two posts? One post: This. I think he is trying to validate his scum read by saying more had come forth.
Waffles on Robocopter, saying he isn't town but doesn't have a read on him at all. Saying someone isn't scum does not equal having no read on that person. Speculation: I'm starting to wonder if this is a slip knowing Robo's alignment (by virtue of not being on a scum team together) but backpedaling to seem ambivalent about his alignment. There is just no good way to argue semantics in this case because it is so clear.charter, ISO 8 wrote:
I didn't say I think he's town. I said I don't think he's scum. I don't have much of a read on him one way or the other.XScorpion wrote:Also charter: Any particular reason you think Robocopter is town?
Charter now believes that Jenni is lurkerscum. Note that the game had only been started 26 hours prior to this statement, in which Jenni had posted two times (excluding her confirmation post). This read is most perplexing, as even if he didn't agree with Jenni's analysis or observations, it can hardly be said to be active lurking. Another fluff accusation that casts doubt on someone based on nothing substantial.charter, ISO 9 wrote:Jenniwren is shaping up nicely for the slot of lurkerscum, we'll have to see how that pans out as time goes by. Actually, now that I actually read her post 53, I believe we've got another scum hooked.
This is strange because he is using a scum read of his (Sawyer) to justify a townie response...charter, ISO 9 wrote:I put myself in their shoes and answered the question, and I came up with something similar to what they said.
Tries to once again explain his read on Robo but tries to muddle the subject by adding in more nonsense like "I don't think he's town and I don't think he's scum" hoping we all would decrypt that jumble to reading "I don't have a read on him." Compare:charter, ISO 12 wrote:
I said I didn't think he's scum (I don't have a scum read on him) and I said I don't think he's town (I don't have a town read on him). He is one or the other, but I don't have a clue as to what he is right now.XVart wrote:If he's not scum, like you said, then what could he be?
to:charter, ISO 6 wrote:I'm not voting Robo because I don't think he's scum.
to:charter, ISO 8 wrote:I didn't say I think he's town. I said I don't think he's scum. I don't have much of a read on him one way or the other.
Note that he never said that Robo wasn't town, but that got added in during the third permutation.charter wrote:I said I didn't think he's scum (I don't have a scum read on him) and I said I don't think he's town (I don't have a town read on him). He is one or the other, but I don't have a clue as to what he is right now.
Now Charter admits that there was no point to his self voting question and there was nothing to follow up on. Also, his follow up with Sawyer shows that he was expecting some sort of response.charter, ISO 14 wrote:I wanted to know why they didn't comment on his self vote. I didn't follow up on it because there was nothing to follow up on. I think something did come out of it, Sawyer's deflecting.
This is especially damning, as Charter is more certain of Jenni being scum now but is voting XScorp (and they can't possibly not be scum together).charter, 14 wrote:I'm actually more sure of Jenniwren at this point, but I really can't imagine XScorpion and Jenniwren not being scum together.
Accuses Sawyer of "deflecting back" on him, which he says is scummy, by Sawyer simply asking why he would respond to the self vote. Highly defensive trying to make Sawyer scummier by him asking why the question charter asked was important/relevant.charter, ISO 15 wrote:
You could for any number of reasons. It wasn't random. It wasn't smart. Anything. It was an innocuous question, which just about any actual answer would have been fine, but you didn't answer, you had to question back.Sawyer wrote:You never answered the question I asked: Why would I comment on Robo's self vote?
Claims Spyrex is obvtown, and uses his unexplained town read to make Jenni more scummy. Also now wants a bandwagon on Jenni, but apparently doesn't want to start it himself.charter, ISO 22 wrote:Spyrex is so obviously town, every time you try and call him scum I just get 100% more sure you are scum.
The giant backpedal with your Spyrex and Kirby (and a little bit of Charter) scum reads is pretty scummy.
I'm debating trying to lynch Jenniwren over XScorpion. Spyrex and Hiphop, what do you think about a Jenniwren lynch?
Now hiphop is scummy, for unexplained, probably apparent reasons, like all his reads.charter, ISO 25 wrote:Looks like hiphop dies day three.
tl;dr version:
charter...- pulls reads out of nowhere; hardly justifies anything, and when he does it is weak observations;
- has a solid scum reads on XScorp, Sawyer, Jenni, hiphop, probably SSBF. Says Jenni is his strongest read, although is voting XScorp;
- Uses supposed scum reads to justify townie behavior and uses alleged town reads to justify scum reads;
- claims Jenni is lurkerscum for posting three times in the first 26 hours of the game; probably to "deflect" attention on him (as he likes to say) because she is questioning him and putting pressure on him; and,
- waffles on whether he thinks robo is not scum or has a neutral read; backpedals a bunch and contrives fake reasoning.
xvart.I only read quote walls.
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"-
-
charter Beware of Dog
- Beware of Dog
- Beware of Dog
- Posts: 9261
- Joined: July 12, 2007
- Location: Virginia
You and Jenniwren can form the "bad cases with no possibility of leading to a lynch on Charter club". Unfortunately, it's not going to be a popular club.
There's no need for all this explaining you keep clamoring for. You see how Five people are voting for XScorpion? You think I'm scum because I didn't concoct some elaborate case on him. The real explanation is there is no need to because the other townies see the same thing I do. It's the same reason I don't need to elaborate on why Spyrex is town. Scum hate when townies identify each other, and you know what they do? They try to undermine it so that the idea doesn't catch on. I'm sure anyone who has played with Spyrex before sees he's town, whether or not they're as vocal about it as me, they are thinking it in their noggin.
(and yeah, I meant Xvart in post 195, pretty obvious I didn't mean Hiphop)-
-
Robocopter87 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7735
- Joined: December 18, 2009
- Location: Yes
Wow, you should become a mind reader.charter wrote: I'm sure anyone who has played with Spyrex before sees he's town, whether or not they're as vocal about it as me, they are thinking it in their noggin.
My head tells me he isn't acting townie much but my mind tells me he is town.Although the border between madness and genius is very narrow.
"I am so totally obsessed with you. You caught me." - Tracy-
-
XScorpion Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: August 15, 2009
-
-
Super Smash Bros. Fan Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1746
- Joined: March 25, 2010
@Robocopter87: Since XScorpion latest big post blasted your scum read off him completely, who is your top suspect now?
To be honest I will have to agree that it is scummy. I disliked how charter said that he did not read jenniwren's latest wall (Referring to her response against me). This seems intentional as although it was mostly directed at me, it did show that she wanted charter dead. Robocopter87 saying that he hasn't read jenniwren's same post is also scummy.Sawyer wrote:On that note, what do you think of how Robo and charter having not read the entire thread?
It would make absolutely no sense for a day vig to intentionally kill a person Day 1. I see no possible town motivation for a day vig to intentionally kill off a person Day 1, which they should use later on to kill scums, not just as a RVS joke. Given that the RVS Daykill was fake, I don't see how Kirbyoshi would have serious motivation for doing so.ConfidAnon wrote:How did you know it wasn't serious? I can see thinking it was a joke because it was so early, but this post implies more assurance than an assumption like that.
Robocopter87 said hiphop was leaning scum. He did not say he was definite scum. Where did he say that?XScorpion wrote:hiphop: Hiphop overreacted to me at the beginning in the same way as Charter overreacted to Robo's self vote, but in this case, hiphop is definite scum in Robo's eyes.
Nothing to say in your defense? Seriously, you aren't even going to try?Robocopter87 wrote:Its a decent case. I don't have anything to respond to.
@xvart: Will try to get back at you later.-
-
XScorpion Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: August 15, 2009
-
-
Robocopter87 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7735
- Joined: December 18, 2009
- Location: Yes
I can definitely say that hiphop as been on my list of scum.Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:@Robocopter87: Since XScorpion latest big post blasted your scum read off him completely, who is your top suspect now?
Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:
To be honest I will have to agree that it is scummy. I disliked how charter said that he did not read jenniwren's latest wall (Referring to her response against me). This seems intentional as although it was mostly directed at me, it did show that she wanted charter dead. Robocopter87 saying that he hasn't read jenniwren's same post is also scummy.Sawyer wrote:On that note, what do you think of how Robo and charter having not read the entire thread?
I said I hadn't read it just then, but I did read it.
No. I'm not going to defend myself from a decent case that changed my read of a player.Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:
Nothing to say in your defense? Seriously, you aren't even going to try?Robocopter87 wrote:Its a decent case. I don't have anything to respond to.Although the border between madness and genius is very narrow.
"I am so totally obsessed with you. You caught me." - Tracy
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.