This was my previous case on him
Now, I'm doing a full painful ISO on him, so I might restate a lot of what I said in that post, with more to come.
0) Okay, so I just want to point out that SSBF has seen how millar plays. This is actually important considering millar's meta
2) Asks me my policy for a joke vote, not really scummy
3) until you see this post. Diacra responded to him and told him one thing that could be going on, and he rebuttals with something that could very well look like an attack (but not enough of one just yet. Fence-sitting
)
4) Okay, at least the fence-sitting has stopped, but I'm not really liking this post. Call it gut though /shrug
5&6) More attacks without attacking, this time on Richard
8) Looking for townie points?
9) Even MORE attacks without attacking.
10) Well at least you finally put an FoS on him. Also, where did your attack on dia go? I mean, she's getting votes now, wouldn't you pay a little bit of attention to her?
11)
I would be up for a policy lynch on millar13. I personally don't like his behavior and his rule-breaking and if he were to continue being disrespectful to the game and the mod doesn't replace him, the next best solution is to lynch him.
Waitwaitwait... didn't he say that he'd seen millar play before?
About youre @Dia1- Didn't she post a town list?
Who replaced Reverse again? I'm willing to bet that if SSBF flipped scum, he's scum too (since the rest of those flipped town)
12) "How so? It's not even inside this game, therefore it is irrelavent."
it was not irrelevant... it had every bit to do with that game.
"But you did ask him a question. That means you're wanting RichardGHP to give him his scum reads AKA, explanations, no matter how minimal that may be"
That's not exactly true. Nice misrep
Diacria wrote:
"Unvote, Vote Supersmash
Picking and choosing targets."
SSBF wrote:
"Wow, at long last, you finally give an explanation for voting someone and you basically OMGUS'd me."
Actually, I'm sad I missed this. Dia had it even before I did. Remember the throwing spaghetti thing I was talking about?
13) One-game meta is not an acceptable meta. Ever.
"f you were talking about that last post, you should have noticed that I made a response to EGL at the end of that paragraph."
You were still tunneling, but at least responding to points against you.
"I did not ask millar to claim, I just said that he can claim if he wanted, just that I suggested he should wait until mylo/lylo or if he got put at L-1 and was asked to claim."
This was exactly what I knew you were going to do, because you covered all of your bases when you told him to claim.
Actually I'm really bored of remaking a case I already made, so I'll start the rest of it at where the last one left off.
42) "Please explain why this is rolefishing. I never asked millar13 to claim at all, I just said that he could claim if he wanted to, just that I'd recommend doing it at L-1/massclaim at Mylo/Lylo.
There was no scummy agenda for that quote.
"
And we're just supposed to believe you? Yah, ok
Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:Xite91 wrote:Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:I'm actually seeing a decent case on raider8169 being formed. A few posts from his hasn't been very good and Rhinox's case against raider8169 is nice as well. I like the bandwagon on both raider8169 and Shattered Viewpoint. I'm still suspicious of Diacria, but his play is improving. Unvote
Shattered Viewpoint and raider8169 are scummy, but raider8169 is scummier. Vote: raider8169
Whaaaaa?
Back in Day 1, I really didn't have much of solid reads, aside from my scum read on Diacria. When Diacria started to become more pro-town, I unvoted because I see no purpose of voting someone that is not your top suspect and I thought there were better suspects them him. That's when my read started to solidfy, as I did eventually vote Shattered Viewpoint, who was one of my first solid scum read.
QFS
Seriously, the reason I went "Whaaaaa?" was because of the obvfence-sitting in that post. And I'm surprised no one else caught it.
"I had a stronger read on Shattered Viewpoint then CSL at the time. I didn't have much to base off of CSL but I felt there was a lot more meat to the Shattered Viewpoint's bandwagon."
This is not reasoning for jumping on a wagon. What do you mean "meat to the [wagon]?"
"This is coming from someone that suspect CSL, RichardGHP, and millar13. Out of the four suspects I've mentioned in ISO: 24, only millar13 is really an easy target, which is why I dropped the case on him. The other three have quality cases put against them that makes them worthy of being lynched. I haven't simply sheeped off other people's case either. I have made my own effort toward trying to get my top five suspects {Charlie, CSL, RichardGHP, animorpherv1, and Chronopie in order from most suspected to least suspected} lynched."
Hoping people can see the scumminess in this post.
43) Is this an attack, or is it just throwing more suspicion around to see if it sticks?
44) "Rage quits are scummy, I will admit that. However, that doesn't always mean I'm going to switch my vote in that instance. I will need to see if RichardGHP comes back and becomes even scummier/successor is scummier before throwing down a vote."
Weren't you convinced he was scum before? What changed? Other than other people's reactions to him, i mean.
"I didn't say he shouldn't role claim, just said it wasn't a good idea. I also did not ask him to claim at all, I just said if he wanted to claim, he could. I would never ask a person to claim where he was at."
Just proving my point further and further
45) I agree with this and don't too. Town do sometimes do it for the same reason, save the slot. The way he did it, though, and when he did it was scummy, I'll agree.
46) But it's a lot harder to complete that goal when you're dead. Open your mind son.
48) Here's how we'll set up the mislynch for tomorrow.
49) And back to the fence-sitting!
50) "Let's say that he attempts to attack his top suspect (In his case, Chronopie)."
Where the hell did chronopie come from?
51) Kind of see a SSBF/Charlie connection, but not too sure yet.
"Things I did where you called my posts nothingness until my FoS on Shattered Viewpoint:
- Got on Shattered Viewpoint for not answering Kmd4390's question.
- Argued with RichardGHP about posting restrictions.
- Briefly talked about Shattered Viewpoint's meta."
But while you did all of these, you added a great ton of fluff to coat it with
55) "*facepalm*
You do realize that if he's telling the truth about his claim that we lose a Day, right? Me suggesting that millar13 should be policy lynched at the beginning of the Day was a terrible idea and I no longer think it's a good idea. Lynching him puts the town at a risk of losing a Day, something that is unaffordable to lose. This is also directed at CSL."
Wait... weren't you pushing the same person's lynch? And now you're (I think) attacking someone for the same idea? hmmm....
57) This post alone should make you think he's scum. Read it a couple times.
62) It was what was written on the brick. Pretty much you pointed out things I had been telling you (and you had been saying nonono to). Then you go back and restate all of that stuff I had already said and vote him. It was like writing on a brick to inform people it was a brick.
Oh look, another case I made on him!
and his rebuttal if you're interested.
66) IT'S A TARP!
67) Another case on an already really suspected player. Wheeeeeeee
68) Youre @ me - no, just every time you attack someone without ACTUALLY attacking so that you can make sure that if they flip town you can say "well I never attacked them"
70) But it happens all the time. This is also not the first time you've said "town would not have a reason to do this" or something to the like. For some reason this is scummy to me.
74) Whohooo more 1-game metaing!
76) How in god's good name did you get 3 votes?
Really too tired to finish this case, since I have a great many more to do in other games. I might later, but don't count on it.
Anyway, the point of the whole case is that I want everyone to vote SSBF
