Mafia 119: MURDER AT HOTEL DEATH(GAME OVER)
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
what I was commenting on was "claiming was a pointless task"..it wasnt...it was only pointless if I didnt expose you. And I know, I know, you keep bringing up that you are town-aligned....if you are scum, you know I am town and I wouldnt lie, so it is safe to say "our claims look alike"....you are not buying creds with me.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
above post was referencing this.
singersigner wrote:
The claim will give a clue as to whatcuriouskarmadog wrote:
but the claim wont have my partner will it?...and then you wouldnt know...come on, this isnt rocket science.PranaDevil wrote:
This is why I was asking about the specific role name earlier, if it does, in fact, state in the role name that they are joint together, then claiming was a pointless task as the name should inform people what's going on.Looker wrote:If CKD were to be NKd the way he claimed, wouldn't his role be shown upon death?youralignment is, though (regardless of me). They can at least figure out whether or not they trust the first claim, and then from there, whatever the second claim is. This is why I'm inclined to believe your claim, because it's exactly the same as mine, and I know I'm town-aligned because of it...so you must be, too, right?NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
Jack Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5460
- Joined: August 13, 2006
-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
I could say the same about you. You're bring in a whole bunch of WIFOM, so sorry if I ignore your stupidity for the time being. Believe me, we're going to need this night to talk/make up for the time I'm now having to defend my idiotic predecessor for, so it's in your best interest to keep me around. If you'd like to continue trying to change my mind, by all means, go ahead.curiouskarmadog wrote:what I was commenting on was "claiming was a pointless task"..it wasnt...it was only pointless if I didnt expose you. And I know, I know, you keep bringing up that you are town-aligned....if you are scum, you know I am town and I wouldnt lie, so it is safe to say "our claims look alike"....you are not buying creds with me.-
-
DemonHybrid And Another Thing...
- And Another Thing...
- And Another Thing...
- Posts: 6762
- Joined: June 1, 2010
- Location: Matamoras, PA
You two are wasting so much time it's ridiculous.singersigner wrote:
I could say the same about you. You're bring in a whole bunch of WIFOM, so sorry if I ignore your stupidity for the time being. Believe me, we're going to need this night to talk/make up for the time I'm now having to defend my idiotic predecessor for, so it's in your best interest to keep me around. If you'd like to continue trying to change my mind, by all means, go ahead.curiouskarmadog wrote:what I was commenting on was "claiming was a pointless task"..it wasnt...it was only pointless if I didnt expose you. And I know, I know, you keep bringing up that you are town-aligned....if you are scum, you know I am town and I wouldnt lie, so it is safe to say "our claims look alike"....you are not buying creds with me.
Stop arguing with each other, lynch someone who isn't a neighbor. Obvious choice for today. Like I said when I claimed and clashed with Pomegranate, it's just not worth assuming that one of the neighbors could be scum to the point of lynch today because the likelihood of 4 town neighborsISthere.-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
You hush. If it's important for town to hash out what they believe or not, then we're gunna go at it. If you don't think it matters for us to get everything out on the table now for the sake of the town in case something happens (or doesn't happen for that matter) to one of us, but instead wait to know "until tomorrow," that's saying something of your knowledge of the game, is it not?
In any case, you're right about one thing. Lynching a neighbor right now is useless until we can all get more information from what happens during the night, but it doesn't mean we cease to scum hunt accordingly.-
-
zwetschenwasser Doktor der Musik
- Doktor der Musik
- Doktor der Musik
- Posts: 8722
- Joined: December 7, 2008
-
-
singersigner I Got This
-
-
DemonHybrid And Another Thing...
- And Another Thing...
- And Another Thing...
- Posts: 6762
- Joined: June 1, 2010
- Location: Matamoras, PA
The deadline's pretty close, though. I'm pretty sure I have a good hold of mafia knowledge, seeing as how I can get priorities straight. Unlike some people....singersigner wrote: You hush. If it's important for town to hash out what they believe or not, then we're gunna go at it. If you don't think it matters for us to get everything out on the table now for the sake of the town in case something happens (or doesn't happen for that matter) to one of us, but instead wait to know "until tomorrow," that's saying something of your knowledge of the game, is it not?
In any case, you're right about one thing. Lynching a neighbor right now is useless until we can all get more information from what happens during the night, but it doesn't mean we cease to scum hunt accordingly.
I think we've said all we can about the neighbors for today. It'd be fine if any of you actually had a legitimate argument, but it's about the same things and you guys are going in circles. Get your heads on straight. This whole situation is null.
The scummiest neighbor I can think of is zwet, but I'd rather the Espy lynch above all else. The info that we have after night two will be invaluable for narrowing down the neighbors, but unless you have complete concrete proof of someone being scummy, and not "they claimed and it's SUCKY" type of arguments, kindly float back down to reality here, please.-
-
Jack Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5460
- Joined: August 13, 2006
-
-
DemonHybrid And Another Thing...
- And Another Thing...
- And Another Thing...
- Posts: 6762
- Joined: June 1, 2010
- Location: Matamoras, PA
I've been keeping NC in mind, actually.
I will look at him much closer Day 2 and see how he responds if he's still alive.-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
No. I just read his ISO, and I'm not convinced. Don't ever say something is "blindingly obvious." That's a cop out for someone who doesn't have a case. Even if you don't feel like you have to interpret the posts you find scummy, at least quote which ones they are.Jack wrote:Nero Caine has not posted here since the 8th (but has posted elsewhere). Several scummy posts from someone with only 8 posts = lynch
unvote, vote:nero caine
Bandwagon PLEASE, and don't ask for a case when it has been made already and it's blindingly obvious why he's scummy if you read his posts.
I don't like NC's inactivity.
I don't like DH's intervention.
I don't like Jack's last post, is his flip-flopping on votes.
I don't like CKD's defensiveness/attacks.
I don't like zwet forcing his partner to claim without discussing it (at least CKD tried to).
The only two of these that I find scummy are Jack and zwet, but I honestly don't think any of the neighbors are scum at this point. And I'm not ready for a Jack wagon. I'd rather lynch Espy and go from there.
What is he at now?-
-
Nero Cain Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 44933
- Joined: December 6, 2009
How can you read my posts if you can't get my name correct?Jack wrote:Nero Caine has not posted here since the 8th (but has posted elsewhere). Several scummy posts from someone with only 8 posts = lynch
unvote, vote:nero caine
Bandwagon PLEASE, and don't ask for a case when it has been made already and it's blindingly obvious why he's scummy if you read his posts.Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
edited c.s. lewis quote b/c limit-
-
PranaDevil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2218
- Joined: January 31, 2010
- Location: England
-
-
vollkan The Interrogator
- The Interrogator
- The Interrogator
- Posts: 5373
- Joined: March 29, 2007
- Location: Australia
Looker's play is pro-town even if it is scummy?Espy wrote: I like lookers play. It is pro town, scummy or not.
^Goodpostinghorrordude0215 wrote:
Are you fucking serious? *facepalm* Look at Espy's post!PranaDevil wrote:Opens with a solid point on zwet, follows up with pointing out Espy had, indeed, pointed out Snake's claim well before he had (I didn't even put much thought into Looker pointing it out because Espy had already shown it quite clearly by then anyway, why is Looker getting grief for that and not Espy?)
Someone explain how the HELL you can translate that as "You shouldn't have sofclaimed"?Espeonage wrote:
Dude, seriously?SnakePlissken wrote:unvoteCame in late and didn't realise that RV had pretty much finished. I shoule Watch out more I guess.
How the fuck is pointing out a softclaim something that needs to be done and is obvtown? WTF?Prana wrote:Looker is obv. town, he's pushing people, and pointing out things that need pointing out.
Did you notice Snake's alleged softclaim?Espeonage wrote:Someone ask me something simple about the game please.
Looker is scum, and when he flips as such, I think I'm gonna be taking a closer look at Prana.PD+5
That depends on your base assumption. Let me explain:CD wrote: @Volk: Horrors only def was that vez was guilty of the same thing as him. This does not defend the point it simply attacks Vez.
Some people (most, actually) approach this game with a presumption that inactivity is scummy. Others, myself included, think that inactivity, being so often a product of non-game factors, cannot be treated as a scumtell.
Of course, in theory, only scum have amotivationto lurk, whereas Town have the opposite. But that's just it -in theory. The problem with that theory is that it ignores non-motivational factors (ie. real-life factors)
A player who was lurking, as HD was (though I see he disputes that he was; and frankly I don't care because it isn't scummy anyway), is most likely going to be far more likely to automatically assume that inactivity isn't scummy. In turn, they are far more likely to do the sort of thing that he did, which is turn the attack back on the attacker.
CD wrote: Also I think omgus does exist, however I don't base my tells on that alone.
What you are attacking here is thetu quoque(latin for "you too") fallacy. OMGUS is entirely different (and non-existennt)
Please explain.curiouskarmadog wrote:unvote, vote cooldog
thats what I thought
Valid question. I have an idea what the answer is, but I want to hear it from Espy first.PD wrote: Okay, now tell me the pro-town reasons for Espy's post there. And what you think the "Dude, seriously?" was referring to. That goes to both you HD, and Espy. What the hell was that comment referring to and what pro-town benefit that post gives us.
You shouldn't have fixed it. That was the gods trying to spare me from having to play with you.Vezok wrote: I'm here.
Sorry internet screwed up.-
-
PranaDevil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2218
- Joined: January 31, 2010
- Location: England
Glad you brought this back up actually.vollkan wrote:
Valid question. I have an idea what the answer is, but I want to hear it from Espy first.PD wrote: Okay, now tell me the pro-town reasons for Espy's post there. And what you think the "Dude, seriously?" was referring to. That goes to both you HD, and Espy. What the hell was that comment referring to and what pro-town benefit that post gives us.
HorrorDude, you said why it referred to, but you still haven't informed us on any pro-town benefit from that post either.
I'm also still waiting for those pushing Looker in regards to pointing out the Watcher claim as to why it benefits scum more to point it out in thread rather than hide it. Where is the scum motivation? I can see a cock-up on the part of town, I absolutely cannot see scum doing that.-
-
vollkan The Interrogator
- The Interrogator
- The Interrogator
- Posts: 5373
- Joined: March 29, 2007
- Location: Australia
Ugh..accidentally hit submit instead of preview
This is just wrong. Espy's wasn't that obvious, let alone to the extent that Looker could reasonably justify not pointing it out (PD wrote: Fair enough, that wasn't a great thing, but Espy had already done so, quite blatantly (I will admit I ignored it in the hope others had, but I feel the need to back up Looker in that he wasn't the one and only person, nor the first, to point it out). But what about the fact you're ignoring that Looker has made good points towards Zwet, Vezo and Espy? Do they all get ignored for what I can make out as one bad post in a sea of scum hunting?Looker+4, by the way)
In that case:DH wrote: Just a reminder that the deadline is nearly exactly 3 days from now.
NicolBolas*50 Jack50 vezokpiraka57 curiouskarmadog50 Stef50 horrordude021550 Espeonage57 CooLDog58 Neo Crain58 zwetschenwasser50 a2rudeboy*50 Pomegranate50 Looker54 SnakePlissken52 PranaDevil55 Demonhybrid50 totallynotmafia50 -
-
vollkan The Interrogator
- The Interrogator
- The Interrogator
- Posts: 5373
- Joined: March 29, 2007
- Location: Australia
And I now realise that, having added up my scores, my vote isn't in the right place. I normally don't end up with a tie for first place. This puts me in a confused position because a major goal of my scoring system is to enable me to remove fluffy on-the-spot judgments from my play. For now,Unvote, Vote: Nero ChainPseudo-vote: CoolDog-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
@ vollkan, bold should answer your question....the particular quote you indicated came after I asked him some questions and he posted without acknowledge my post. I had to vote him to get him to answer...
curiouskarmadog wrote:
that being said, what makes you think I am voting CD for being lazy? He has stated he has read my claim (after some prodding)...I think I have caught him in some bullshit act to look like he is scum hunting (stated this in my vote). I am going to keep backing him in the corner...(ie to see where he really wants to take this). I have a point at the end of it, but good money says he isnt going to let it get that far and will bail on the question.
still waiting on you CD.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
PranaDevil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2218
- Joined: January 31, 2010
- Location: England
Please explain the scum motivation for Looker pointing out so blatantly please.vollkan wrote:Ugh..accidentally hit submit instead of preview
This is just wrong. Espy's wasn't that obvious, let alone to the extent that Looker could reasonably justify not pointing it out (PD wrote: Fair enough, that wasn't a great thing, but Espy had already done so, quite blatantly (I will admit I ignored it in the hope others had, but I feel the need to back up Looker in that he wasn't the one and only person, nor the first, to point it out). But what about the fact you're ignoring that Looker has made good points towards Zwet, Vezo and Espy? Do they all get ignored for what I can make out as one bad post in a sea of scum hunting?Looker+4, by the way)-
-
vollkan The Interrogator
- The Interrogator
- The Interrogator
- Posts: 5373
- Joined: March 29, 2007
- Location: Australia
"Hey guise a watcher!" whilst also maintaining plausible deniabilityPranaDevil wrote:
Please explain the scum motivation for Looker pointing out so blatantly please.vollkan wrote:Ugh..accidentally hit submit instead of preview
This is just wrong. Espy's wasn't that obvious, let alone to the extent that Looker could reasonably justify not pointing it out (PD wrote: Fair enough, that wasn't a great thing, but Espy had already done so, quite blatantly (I will admit I ignored it in the hope others had, but I feel the need to back up Looker in that he wasn't the one and only person, nor the first, to point it out). But what about the fact you're ignoring that Looker has made good points towards Zwet, Vezo and Espy? Do they all get ignored for what I can make out as one bad post in a sea of scum hunting?Looker+4, by the way)-
-
CooLDoG Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
-
-
vezokpiraka Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6034
- Joined: June 17, 2010
-
-
CooLDoG Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
@ckd, the other guy gets the 1-shot kill correct?
@volken, glad to get the most points on that there chart. (I hope thats some sort of emote over there...)
I must be going, deadline is soon, and by the way volk, I still think that the "you too" fallicy exists, I really must run though. No time to evne check for spelling, gramar...after a wank.-
-
CooLDoG Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.