Star Wars Quote Mafia- Game over

[RangeroftheNorth]

Random Vote: armlx

[RangeroftheNorth]

We seem to have a bandwagon on thok. Why? Because his name his to close to Thoth, and he's in a lot of games with ibaesha. Definate scum tells.

Unvote
Vote: Thok

[RangeroftheNorth]

Unvote: Thok

I didn't want to bandwagon him to death. Just a nice innocent little bandwagon and here you people are trying to kill someone.

unvote Vote Thok

8th vote. =D

i think the this game probably has star wars quotes as the role names, but im unsure about that.

Vote: Dranko

For a duh statement, and for voting thok while thok was trying to give us information.

[RangeroftheNorth]

(/aisde to self it's interesting that RangeroftheNorth votes me instead of armlx, when armlx was obviously a million billion more scummy in his last post of trying to kill of thok before any real claiming. If armlx is scum its likely that Ranger is too. /endaside)

just because armlx is suspicious, doesn't mean you aren't too. I saw that armlx had already attracted attention, and wanted to point out another suspicious person.

[RangeroftheNorth]

It isn't helpful. If you don't provide your reasoning, how will we know why you're voting for that person? Of course, I seem to be under suspicion to so maybe my playing style isn't much better. I have no idea why armlx is more suspicious than Dranko.

[RangeroftheNorth]

Any reason for that Fritz?

I'll go back to

Vote: Dranko

I'll admit that he wasn't as scummy as armlx, but he still put an extra vote on thok when thok was claiming, and I still don't like his statement about all the roles being quotes.

[RangeroftheNorth]

I don't see how armlx's role would make us want to lynch thok

[RangeroftheNorth]

I guess we're all waiting for Dranko

[RangeroftheNorth]

I think we can afford to wait a couple days SOS. It's thanksgiving weekend and it has only been 2 days since he posted. I think we can give him until monday or tuesday.

[RangeroftheNorth]

zu_Faul:
I apologize. I thought I had said this on day 1, but apparently I had not. After rereading the thread and thanks to a post by (I believe) thok explaining, I realized why armlx was more scummy than Dranko. Nevertheless, I didn't change my vote because at that point armlx was close to a lynch and I wanted to hear from him first.

You seem to be consistently attacking me. So far, my main suspicious behavior seems to have been voting for Dranko rather than for armlx. ARMLX WASN'T MAFIA. Even if I had defended him (which I didn't) or attacked one of his attackers (which I didn't), not voting for him is not a good enough reason to attack me. In fact, there is more reason to attack the people who were on the armlx wagon, especially after he claimed.

I don't think we should lynch him... if I was about to make a role to this quote, I would have madde something very bad for the town...

This doesn't make any sense to me. If you would have made this role anti-town, why shouldn't we lynch him.

FoS: zu_Faul

[RangeroftheNorth]

I think I will leave my vote where it is. You sort of expect that behavior from BJ, but following him? Absurd.

[RangeroftheNorth]

That's easy BJ: you started it

[RangeroftheNorth]

So we have a very sudden and completely random bandwagon on Quailman. That worked out so well for us when we did it to Thok.

[RangeroftheNorth]

Shouldn't you guys at least have a reason to be lynching quailman?

[RangeroftheNorth]

As far as I can tell there is no reason for the quilman bandwagon

[RangeroftheNorth]

not that I believe Quailman.

there's 5 million quotes to chose from, not like a fake is that hard.

You keep asking why we don't believe dranko, and then you say this. And

quailman claimed a role

. Dranko didn't even bother to do that. Quailman claims a fairly well known quote, while Dranko's is fairly obscure, and gives a role, not just a quote, and you are still suspicious of him, yet you cannot understand our continued suspicions of dranko? Seems odd to me.

[RangeroftheNorth]

I am still most suspicious of Dranko. I would be willing to vote for SOS if voting for Dranko doesn't seem to be doing any good.

[RangeroftheNorth]

I disagree. I think that there are enough quotes that norinel could easily have chosen plenty that were at least as popular. We're drawing from six movies. That said, even if I was sure that that was your quote, it wouldn't convince me you were pro-town. Quote claiming gives us no reason to believe you. I want to hear the ability.

[RangeroftheNorth]

Then my vote stays.

[RangeroftheNorth]

FOS: Mr. Stoofer

He has been defensive of Dranko this entire game. Dranko is refusing to give us information even when he has been asked for it.

[RangeroftheNorth]

I believe we may have found something to unite these 2 sides. elvis is playing very defensively, and seems to be attempting to hang back and avoid attention. While I still think that Dranko hasn't given us enough information, I will be willing to let it go for now.

Unvote: Dranko

although I still want that information.

Vote: elvis_knits

[RangeroftheNorth]

Is there a better time?

Beginning of a game?

[RangeroftheNorth]

It seems like you're trying to divert attention from your own bandwagon: "Hey look at PB. Let's vote him."

[RangeroftheNorth]

you have to be aggressively defensive, unless you want to be defensively offensive, thats another story

What does that even mean?

[RangeroftheNorth]

Are you talking about me or Dranko?

[RangeroftheNorth]

So even if Dranko was telling the truth, we have no way for him to verify his role. I can guarantee, however, that quailman was not responsible for last nights kill.

[RangeroftheNorth]

Quailman was responisble for the kill?

Did you actually read my post? Did you notice the

not

in my post that is somehow miraculously missing in your interpretation?

Ranger, You better claim. You

do

know that there were two kills last night right?

Yes, I know their were two kills. Since one of the kills was being claimed by two separate claimed vigilantes I assumed that everyone would know I was talking about the second, but if you insist, I can guarantee that quailman was not responsible for either of the kills. I am going to go ahead and spell this out. I am a role blocker. Last night I blocked quailman. Quailman is not responisble for either of last nights two kills. If you'll notice, my information corresponds rather nicely with yours. If quailman is innocent, he couldn't have been responsible for the second kill.

I have SOS and Ranger peged as scum right now, I think Ranger ment to lie for SOS, and said Quailman instead.

Quite frankly, you are wrong. I am not scum, and I said exactly what I meant to. If you had actually read my post, I think you would realize that this does not even make any sense. I do not intend to make any attempt to defend SOS, although, of the two claimed vigs, I think you are by far the more suspicious.

[RangeroftheNorth]

Once again I have to ask: did you read my post?

Vote: Dranko

for completely disregarding anything I actually said in my post, taking one phrase out of context, and voting me for it.

[RangeroftheNorth]

Six votes in less than two hours. I think that's plenty.

[RangeroftheNorth]

I'd rather not lynch him until we at least hear if he has anything to say for himself.

[RangeroftheNorth]

I can't even count the number of times I've been fosed by you two. Still, I don't think either of you have ever voted me. I'm begginning to think your foses mean nothing.

[RangeroftheNorth]

Right you are. I was just going from memory. Still, my point stands.

[RangeroftheNorth]

I think that zu_faul is almost definately the right lynch for today. I'd be interested to hear what he has to say before we kill him. Until he has posted, I think 6 votes is enough.

[RangeroftheNorth]

That was about the only thing he could have said that would have convinced me not to vote for him immediatly. I don't believe the claim, but it is easily testable. The problem is that it could just be a ploy to get our claimed vig kill. What do other people think about this?

[RangeroftheNorth]

Vote: Zu_faul

[RangeroftheNorth]

for once, I agree with fritzler

[RangeroftheNorth]

PB: Could you please clearly list, who you have investigated and on what nights? If so, it would be helpful. The reason I would like this is because it is possible that someone was recruited into the cult after they were investigated. It is also possible, however, that you are now a cult member, so there's that.

[RangeroftheNorth]

I have been against just as many of these bandwagons as I have been on. I think that the main reasons for the fast bandwagons are now dead (Fritz and BJ)

[RangeroftheNorth]

I will

Vote: Dranko

. I have nothing better to do and it seems to be a stand-by in this game

[RangeroftheNorth]

Alright, I'd just like to point this out, I've role claimed. If you don't believe it, fine, but don't ignore it while finding me suspicious.

[RangeroftheNorth]

I am going to go ahead and spell this out. I am a role blocker. Last night I blocked quailman. Quailman is not responisble for either of last nights two kills.

I have information that I am not currently willing to share. I have role blocked a variety of people, and, when some of them role claim, perhaps, I will have useful information to share. Until then, I fail to see what good giving out that information would do.

I can understand not being convinced. It just seemed that people who were finding me suspicious where ignoring the fact that I had claimed, and I wanted to point it out.

[RangeroftheNorth]

My information is only useful in catching scum if the scum don't know what it is. If a scum goes to role claim and says something that I can contradict, using my information, than my information helps catch scum. If I tell you all my information now, it might have very slight benefits. If I could tell you that someone who was under suspicion didn't make the kill last night, I probably would. But even that wouldn't prove anything. PB's information is only useful if everyone knows it. My information is only useful if no one knows it until a certain point.

[RangeroftheNorth]

No, I'm not positive I'll be alive to share it, but I don't think the risk of my dying before I can reveal it is great enough to offset how much more useful it will be if I don't reveal it until it becomes relevant. In any case, I will not reveal it solely based on the suspicions of you and Dranko (who I'm not sure has actually read any of my posts)

[RangeroftheNorth]

Where is everyone?

I think that TSAGod is a good target from the quicklynchers. He's been keeping a low profile throughout the game.

vote:TSAGod

[RangeroftheNorth]

Sorry, hit submit before I was finished.

Where is everyone?

I think that TSAGod is a good target from the quicklynchers. He's been keeping a low profile throughout the game.

vote:TSAGod

I'll Vote: Dranko also, I guess. I don't really like the TSA wagon (

because lynching zu_faul did seem to make sense at the time

) and the Ranger wagon makes even less sense to me.

The reason the quicklynchers are targeted is not because they lynched zu_faul. There were good reasons for lynching him.
The reason is that he was lynched so fast. There's no good argument to lynch him without even giving him the chance to speak, unless you're scum and don't want to give him the chance to reveal last nights result.

Alright, this isn't much, but it does seem sort of fishy. Thoth states initially that TSAGod would be a good target for the "quicklynchers" and votes him for that reason. Later, however, he states that ther quicklynchers (including TSAGod) are being targeted because they lynched zu_faul.

It isn't much, but it is better than what I have on dranko, and nothing else seems to be happening.

[RangeroftheNorth]

oh, btw

unvote
Vote: thoth

[RangeroftheNorth]

Unvote: Thoth

I guess I misread that. Sorry

[RangeroftheNorth]

i only have claimed to block quailman 1 night

[RangeroftheNorth]

Vote: Dranko

Everytime I unvote Dranko, he gives me another good reason to vote for him. I think TSAGod's response sums it up pretty well, dranko: WTF?

[RangeroftheNorth]

Umm, Dranko?

Investigated

n1 shamrock
n2 thoth
n3 Ibesha
n4 coron

And PB got all innocent results. It's possible that coron is a GF, or that PB is naive, but unless you have evidence, there's no reason to believe it.

[RangeroftheNorth]

It is highly possible that the town is facing a serious crisis right now. It is possible that, out of our eight players, four are cultists. This assumes that Fritzler was able to recruit one cultist a night. Here is the situation as I see it:

I think it is most likely that we have 2 mafia left. Four mafia seems over powered, especially considering Raj's role. 2, even with raj, seems a bit weak. Therefore, I think it is extremely likely that there are only two mafia remaining.

This gives us three potentially dangerous scenarios:
1. Four Cultists, 2 Mafia, 2 Town
2. Three cultists, 2 Mafia, 2 Town
3. 2 cultists, 2 mafia, 2 town

1. In this scenario, Thoth's alignment is highly important. If Thoth is a cult member, we cannot lynch a cult member today. However, if he is not, the town's only chance of winning the game, and the mafia's best chance, lies in killing a cult member.

2. This scenario gets tricky. If Thoth is a mafia member, this will give us three groups of equal voting strength. In this, the town's best option would be to lynch a mafia member. The mafia would, hopefully, kill a cult member, and the town would retain a degree of control over the outcome of the game.

3. In this scenario, lynching a mafia member would definately be superior to lynching a cultist. The cultists could be dealt with after the mafia was eleminated, and attempting to deal with the cultists first would make a mafia win likely.

It is also possible that there is only one cultist remaining. I'm not going to address this, as it doesn't present a very large threat to the town, and I don't think it's very likely. Right now, what we do depends on which scenario everyone thinks is most likely.

[RangeroftheNorth]

I'm not sure that scenario one is most likely. It is quite possible that Fritzler had a limited number of recruitments, or that he could only recruit every other night. Otherwise, the possibility of having the town in this situation seems quite probable. To bad we already lynched armlx, eh?

[RangeroftheNorth]

So if we are assuming that there are less that four cultists, it makes sense ot lynch a mafia member today.

Vote: Thoth

It's nothing that I can put my finger on, but my scumdar is going crazy about him. He doesn't seem like a cult member, and I really suspect that he is mafia.

[RangeroftheNorth]

I'm here and would very much like a role claim from Shamrock, but I'm not going to put the last vote on.

[RangeroftheNorth]

If I don't get a claim, shamrock, you will get my vote.

[RangeroftheNorth]

It makes sense for PB to be a cultist. I'm not sure why people wouldn't vote for PB based on your information.

Vote: Peacebringer

[RangeroftheNorth]

I'm really sorry for my recent lack of posting. It was caused by some serious problems in my life. Fortunately, those seem to have cleared up, and I should be able to get back to the game.

I have already role claimed. I am a role blocker. I believe Shamrock is our last mafia. inHim has claimed tracker, and last night I blocked TSAGod. If there is only one mafia, which is what makes the most sense, it is not TSAGod. I have no reason not to believe inHim's claim. Therefore, Shamrock must be scum. I say we lynch him today. If he isn't scum (which I think is highly unlikely), I can block inHim tonight, and we can lynch him tomorrow.

Vote: Shamrock