Star Wars Quote Mafia- Game over

[zu_Faul]

Armlx seems scum he wanted to quicklynch Thok while Thok was just providing a claim. Can hardly imagine something more scummy.

It isn't helpful. If you don't provide your reasoning, how will we know why you're voting for that person? Of course, I seem to be under suspicion to so maybe my playing style isn't much better. I have no idea why armlx is more suspicious than Dranko.

FOS: RangerOfTheNorth

A try to defend armlx. If the latter is scum, so should RangerOfTheNorth be.

[armlx]

I was lynching Thok under the concept he had admitted he was mafia. I figured he was making a bad play and then tried to simply buy time for something stupid.

BTW,

Unvote Thok

[armlx]

2. I could be wrong, but wouldn't that be useful for scum as well? Both scum and town can evaluate the game and guess at a lynch or lose situation. The town can even discuss it and figure it out amongst themselves to a relatively close degree if they've reached such a situation, where the scum cannot speculate about it openly.

Sorry to double post but I just have to comment on this idiocy.

And the mafia can do simple math. Let number of town players equal T and number of scum equal M.

If T < or = M, mafia wins. Mafia kills at night, plus the lynch of a townie in a lynch or lose means if T = M+2 or T = M+1 it is a lynch or lose.

[elvis_knits]

I was lynching Thok under the concept he had admitted he was mafia. I figured he was making a bad play and then tried to simply buy time for something stupid.

You could have waited to see if he was indeed going to come up with "something stupid." I think if someone is claiming, you should at least give them time to claim so you can evaluate that claim.

Also, I see the oregano-pizza-mafia connection (sort of), but I don't think that really counts as him "admitting he was mafia."

I would vote you except you're pretty near the lynch, and I want to keep pressure on your scum buddy, RangeroftheNorth.

[Fritzler]

2. I could be wrong, but wouldn't that be useful for scum as well? Both scum and town can evaluate the game and guess at a lynch or lose situation. The town can even discuss it and figure it out amongst themselves to a relatively close degree if they've reached such a situation, where the scum cannot speculate about it openly.

Sorry to double post but I just have to comment on this idiocy.

And the mafia can do simple math. Let number of town players equal T and number of scum equal M.

If T < or = M, mafia wins. Mafia kills at night, plus the lynch of a townie in a lynch or lose means if T = M+2 or T = M+1 it is a lynch or lose.

Not necessarily, maybe there's a super 1337 cult or a super 1337 serial killer that decided not to kill so no one would know about them. It still helps scum.

[Mr Stoofer]

...Er, isn't this a no brainer?

Thok said he had a way to prove his innocence, and then armlx attempted to apply the finishing vote before he had a chance to do so.

As it happens, Thok's "proof" is ambiguous, although his power makes him much more likely to be pro-town than anti-town. But that's not the point. The point is that he said that he could prove his innocence and armlx tried to prevent that.

Unvote: Thok, vote: armlx.

[rajrhcpfreak]

...Er, isn't this a no brainer?

yep

[ibaesha]

An unknown vigilante is another example where scum's 'simple math' could be off.

I know that as scum in Mini 203 I contemplated scenarios and whether or not the town would be at a lynch or lose situation at a certain point. And that the knowledge would've been helpful. Therefore, armlx, in my view (which you call idiocy), your role doesn't clear you as pro-town.

[elvis_knits]

Maybe armlx should roleclaim.

Also, could we get a vote count,

mod

? Gracias!

[Fritzler]

If Raj's vote counted there's 10 on armlx, if not 9. And elvis, are you blind? He already role claimed:

I am "I have a bad feeling about this". If a lynch-or-lose or similar sitatuion pops up, the mod tells me.

[elvis_knits]

LOL. I didn't know what he was talking about when he said "I have a bad feeling about this." I was very...confused. And why didn't he say what episode it came from? I would assume all the quotes came to us in the same form.

So I'm sort of nervous to put on the lynching vote (as I never have before), but the evidence is overwhelming. Does it get any better than this? I'm putting on the lynching vote (provided Norinel counts raj).

unvote
finishing vote: armlx

[SOS]

Hmm, It would seem I have come back a bit too late for any relevant stuff.

Though I agree on lynching armlx.

[Fritzler]

I was going to remind you all once a bandwagon started getting momentum, but this one got a bit too much momentum faster than I could get on to post it. I'm testing out a nonstandard twilight rule for this game:

I don't like twilight posting, but I understand that miscounts happen. If you're casting a vote that would, as far as you know, take the voted player to the lynch threshold or higher, bold Finishing vote: IS rather than just vote. After that, nobody should post game-related stuff until I get on to confirm. (And I'll check the thread often enough to notice relatively soon, unless I'm away/asleep.) A vote that would take someone to the lynch threshold or higher but isn't specified as finishing will not be counted. I will forgive mistakes regarding FV-ing too early, but if it gets abused I will not be happy.

(no more posting dude)

[Norinel]

To the mod: Can we vote/unvote after a finishing vote (eventhough it won't count if the finishing vote was indeed the last vote).
Could be important if you want to give someone some time to speak after a wrong finishing vote, but don't want to keep him one away from lynch, so that the first one posting after you can finish im of.
Conversely if you might want to finish someone of for good and cast a real finishing vote..

I'm not quite sure that that solves any more problems than it causes.

Anyway, I won't be counting raj's vote, which is quite plainly unbolded, so:

Vote Count:

armlx- 9 (zu_faul, Thok,

ibaesha

, Dranko20, Fritzler, BabyJesus, Mr Stoofer, elvis_knits)
Dranko20- 2 (RangerOfTheNorth, TSAGod)
RangerOfTheNorth- 1 (Quailman)
Fritzler- 1 (rajrhcpfreak)
Quailman- 1 (Shamrock)
Mr Stoofer- 1 (SOS)
SinisterOverlord- 1 (PBuG)

Not voting (4): PeaceBringer, Thoth, SinisterOverlord, armlx

11 to lynch.

Move along.

[Shamrock]

Well, armlx certainly does seem fishy. I mean, seriously, rushing Thok along to a quick lynch without allowing his claim to get any validity (fortunately I managed to confirm his claim because of armlx's miscount) ... not good. Quick lynchers are no one's friend.

Unvote: Quailman

,

Vote: armlx

[rajrhcpfreak]

sry

unvote
finishing vote: armlx

[Norinel]

Deathscene tomorrow (real time, not game time); too much needs to be done, too tired tonight.

[Norinel]

End of Day Vote Count:

armlx- 11 (zu_faul, Thok,

ibaesha

, Dranko20, Fritzler, BabyJesus, Mr Stoofer, elvis_knits, Shamrock, rajrhcpfreak)
Dranko20- 2 (RangerOfTheNorth, TSAGod)
RangerOfTheNorth- 1 (Quailman)
Mr Stoofer- 1 (SOS)
SinisterOverlord- 1 (PBuG)

Not voting (4): PeaceBringer, Thoth, SinisterOverlord, armlx

Day 1

The quotes come to their decision quickly, as computer programs have a way of doing. Armlx's brazen moves yield suspicion of him, and while he purports to have the ability to detect when the situation is in grave danger, he goes unheeded. The removal runs, and the post-removal verifies that armlx was exactly as he said he was.

armlx ("I have a bad feeling about this.", endgame notifier) - lynched Day 1

It is now Night, send choices. Deadline 72 hours from this post.

(For the record, armlx was pro-town; if a short rolename describes an ability but not an alignment, you can assume the person in question was pro-town. Also, some people have already sent Night 2 choices; with the activity of the players, I assume they'll have time to change it if the results of the lynch affect their decision.)

Edit: The only activity check (See the rules) for today is now for the entire day; everyone posted at least once except PeaceBringer, who I'll prod and replace if he doesn't send a night choice or an "I'm still here" PM, as appropriate, by deadline.

[Norinel]

Night 2:

This time the quote found deleted is SinisterOverlord. Perhaps someone will be giving thanks for his deletion, but it isn't the database in general.

Also, this time BabyJesus has the extended access; his vote will count double today.

SinisterOverlord ("Well, somebody has to save our skins. Into the garbage chute, flyboy!", doctor) - deleted Night 2

It is now Day 2, 17 players but 18 votes makes 10 to lynch.

[Thok]

I need to reread; I sent Stoofer a message today-he can reveal whatever part of the content he desires.

[elvis_knits]

I expected Thok to be dead. I mean "deleted." But I guess mafia can use that to frame Thok. Or maybe they just wanted to go for a more powerful role...like doctor

[elvis_knits]

Oh. Or maybe Thok's mafia...don't want to leave that one out...

[Fritzler]

Vote: Thoth

[RangeroftheNorth]

Any reason for that Fritz?

I'll go back to

Vote: Dranko

I'll admit that he wasn't as scummy as armlx, but he still put an extra vote on thok when thok was claiming, and I still don't like his statement about all the roles being quotes.

[TSAGod]

I'll continue the carry over on Dranko20, too!

vote: Dranko20

.