first, i don't believe i said it was "scummy" per se. i use my vote as an investigation tool. if you'll notice, it has since moved. i support the jmurph wagon at this time. see? my vote is producing a trail of my suspicions.
not voting leaves no trail of evidence. votes can serve as proof of suspicion. i.e. if jesse goes the whole game without voting or expressing suspicion, how would you determine his alignment? voting moves the game forward by applying pressure, forcing others to take a stand as to whether or not they support particular cases, and are the only way in which town can successfully rid itself of scum(vigilantes aside of course.) it is a core component to the game of mafia. theory discussion without voting = fluff.
imo my vote on jesse brought him into the open and has forced him to participate. he disagrees, so whatever.
robo wrote:The difference is that was all you did while I didn't just vote Katsuki, I discussed other matters also.
again: not my fault he got modkilled. day was shortened. also, the matters you discussed were irrelevant imo. kind of lik i feel that your pursuing of this matter is also irrelevant as you are ignoring the crux of my questioning:
how is my vote "scummy" and yours is not when the votes were FOR THE EXACT SAME REASONING? your answer of "well,
i
was having an irrelevant theory discussion with jesse" is lacking...