*facepalm*podium123456 wrote:A. You just said that not giving town reads is a town action. Herp.LynchMePls wrote:Yes, having that many scum reads and NO town reads is scummy. Period.podium wrote: Really scummy, eh? With 2 scum left you think me calling 2 people scummy, and 1 slightly scummy, is excessive? Even if you want to classify my comment about Taz as me implying i thought he was scummy (which is a stretch)... big whoop. There were 2 scum left, and unlike you, i had no idea who they were.
B. I had1more scum read than you did at that point...
C. Lol.
A) I think listing town reads early in mini games is generally bad for town. I think saying "I have no town reads" in 5-man mylo is scummy.
B) And no town reads.
C) Lol.
Ya, because I wasn't focused on making sure I'd called everyone in the game scummy. I was more focused on lynching the people I thought were scum. I love how I'm supposed to get negative credit in retrospect because I didn't notice you being scummy earlier in the game, when your whole style was lay low and poke scum accusations at people, and I had a much bigger fish to fry.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
You're analogy doesn't work... i didnt push a case on you, but iLMP wrote: Wait a sec, so you're supposed to get credit for "pursuing scummier cases", but then you call me out for not mentioning you before endgame? So this works for you and not me?didmention your scumminess. You didn't mentionanythingabout me, even though you are now claiming i was acting really scummy all game.
You intentionally left out the fact that i mentioned your scumminess, to make it look like i am being a hypocrite.
Twisting facts.
Because you know that's not true, but you have to push that version of events or you'll get caught. It's not hard.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
When i write opinions like this, you call it 'twisting facts' or 'revising history'. But when you do it, i guess it's a narrative?LynchMePls wrote: I don't even grant that you were "pursuing scummier cases". The only case you took any initiative on was Dr. P, which can easily be put down as someone using an awkward posting style leading to lots of misunderstandings and then a ragequit. Every other case was built by other people. You wouldn't get on board UT scum until the massclaim forced you to and you got on the Zodiark wagon late also.
The same can pretty much be done for you, you know. Here:
The only case you took any initiative on was UT, which can easily be put down as someone making a normal null observation about an argument... you even gave the same observation that UT did about that argument. Every other case was built by other people. You only voted ABR because you saw town was voting for him, and figured you had better do so as well. You did the same thing with Zodiark.
Now go ahead and tell me why i am being disingenuous, and you aren't.