Open 256~Fire and Ice Mafia Over!
-
-
Zed Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 278
- Joined: July 31, 2010
- Location: New York
-
-
don_johnson Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7398
- Joined: December 4, 2008
- Location: frozen tundra
jesse wrote:Actually that's incorrect. I vote to lynch. I don't do the whole RVS or any of that.I rarely policy lynch but occasionally I will.jesse wrote:If I had to pick one as being the scummiest I'd pick tanstalas.
your reasons here are for basically not liking my playstyle. not really a whole lot of "you're scum because.." in our back and forth. you just didn't like my vote, all the while saying tans was "scummy". bolded is the part that can be read as a "policy" type reason to lynch.jesse wrote:Vote: DJ
Because I have NO idea how we're going to make it through this game with players as ridiculous as you. I don't think you're the scummiest player but you're in my top three and considering there's four scum that's good enough for me.And I think you'd be the most beneficial dead to the town.
again, no backing as tojesse wrote:Scum play all different types of ways and like I said I don't think you're the highest likelihood of being scum but you're pretty darn close. That combined with the fact that you're probably the best lynch of the day cemented my vote for you.whyi'm "the best lynch of the day". more emphasis on the likelihood that i am not actually scum as well.
again, the bolded sounds more like "policy" reasons to lynch someone. also, please note that this votejesse wrote:So Unvote, Vote: Lowell
For being hypocritical scum attempting to cruise through this game providing nothing to be incriminated on and just generally being an extremely unhelpful player.Whether that's on purpose or not I'm more than happy with that being grounds of a lynch.alsocarries the allusion to his suspect being town as opposed to scum. its not terribly odd, but for someone who claims to vote "scum" and onnly "rarely" policy lynch, it seems jessesheffield has voted for two players with mainly "policy" type reasoning, all the while avoiding placing a vote on his top suspect: tanstalas.
thoughts?town 39-32
mafia 17-9
sk 0-6-
-
Robocopter87 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7735
- Joined: December 18, 2009
- Location: Yes
Sup?
Will read tonight.Although the border between madness and genius is very narrow.
"I am so totally obsessed with you. You caught me." - Tracy-
-
Zed Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 278
- Joined: July 31, 2010
- Location: New York
So, I reread. It isn't very complete because I don't have a lot of time tonight. But the basic thing I'm thinking is, I have no idea what to think about anyone. I'm finding it difficult to get a read on anyone, and maybe it is just because I replaced it (this is my first one, and the game feels very different to me). I do have time when I'm on the bus in the morning, usually, so I'll be reading again and looking at more detail if I get the chance.hi. I am a girl. no more confusion necessary.-
-
Lowell Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6318
- Joined: July 25, 2006
If me picking on moth is opportunistic, then clearly you picking on me is as well. We're at a meta-standoff, only at least I believe what I'm saying whereas you, for some reason, feel the need to defend moth's honor.JesseSheffield wrote:Lowell you're attacking mothrax for a hypocritical reason. Your conclusion that he's deliberating averting legitimate cases is exactly what you're doing. Because by no means is your case a legitimate case. Furthermore, you've had ten posts this entire game and have failed in almost every single one of them to do something legitimately helpful.
SoUnvote, Vote: Lowell
For being hypocritical scum attempting to cruise through this game providing nothing to be incriminated on and just generally being an extremely unhelpful player. Whether that's on purpose or not I'm more than happy with that being grounds of a lynch.-
-
mothrax Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1711
- Joined: July 3, 2010
- Location: Here, There, Everywhere
-
-
JesseSheffield Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 362
- Joined: August 30, 2010
- Location: Chicago
Nice job of picking my words apart to reveal less than a half truth DJ.
don_johnson wrote:jesse wrote:Actually that's incorrect. I vote to lynch. I don't do the whole RVS or any of that.I rarely policy lynch but occasionally I will.jesse wrote:If I had to pick one as being the scummiest I'd pick tanstalas.
your reasons here are for basically not liking my playstyle. not really a whole lot of "you're scum because.." in our back and forth. you just didn't like my vote, all the while saying tans was "scummy". bolded is the part that can be read as a "policy" type reason to lynch.jesse wrote:Vote: DJ
Because I have NO idea how we're going to make it through this game with players as ridiculous as you. I don't think you're the scummiest player but you're in my top three and considering there's four scum that's good enough for me.And I think you'd be the most beneficial dead to the town.
My case on tanstalas had nothing to do with a policy lynch so I have no idea where you were going with that? And I had a LOT of reasoning behind why I wanted to lynch you. Nearly a half a page of my ISO posts are dedicated to me wanted to lynch you for X reason. Some of that reasoning did dabble in policy lynch reasoning and I have absolutely no qualms about that. I still think you're useless, I still think you're ridiculous, and I still think you'd be beneficial dead.JesseSheffield wrote:tanstalas' attack on shotty was ABSOLUTELY ridiculous and totally backwards. The idea that Katsuki replaced because she's scum in this game and would leave her team at a disadvantage is just plain stupid. Probably the most opportunistic case/wagon I've ever seen.
The difference between us Lowell is I've been actively participating and attempting to generate conversation every moment I can. You've done absolutely nothing. So my attack on you is not even comparable to your hypocritical attack on mothrax. This isn't a meta-standoff, and you don't believe what you're saying. Otherwise you would've taken active steps to make sure you don't fit the exact attack you're employing on someone else.Lowell wrote:If me picking on moth is opportunistic, then clearly you picking on me is as well. We're at a meta-standoff, only at least I believe what I'm saying whereas you, for some reason, feel the need to defend moth's honor.And who's going to stop me...-
-
don_johnson Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7398
- Joined: December 4, 2008
- Location: frozen tundra
-
-
JesseSheffield Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 362
- Joined: August 30, 2010
- Location: Chicago
Oh my God. I can't even deal with you.
Read the game. You even quoted this. How are you misunderstanding. Let me restate just so you can understand this.JesseSheffield wrote:Actually that's incorrect. I vote to lynch. I don't do the whole RVS or any of that. I rarely policy lynch but occasionally I will.
JesseSheffield wrote:I vote to lynch.JesseSheffield wrote:I vote to lynch.JesseSheffield wrote:I vote to lynch.JesseSheffield wrote:I rarely policy lynch but occasionally I will.
Do you understand DJ?JesseSheffield wrote:I vote to lynch.And who's going to stop me...-
-
don_johnson Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7398
- Joined: December 4, 2008
- Location: frozen tundra
-
-
JesseSheffield Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 362
- Joined: August 30, 2010
- Location: Chicago
I'm assuming by that you're asking why I'm not voting Zed. And the reasons why are because I find him much less scummy than tanstalas was, there hasn't been much activity that I can get an accurate read on Zed from, and other players have popped up clearer on my radar since the beginning of the day. I'm not basing my cases on you or Lowell on policy lynches. There are elements of a policy lynch in it but I believe the likelihood the two of you are scum are pretty high. So I'm quite confident in both my cases on both of you.And who's going to stop me...-
-
don_johnson Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7398
- Joined: December 4, 2008
- Location: frozen tundra
-
-
JesseSheffield Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 362
- Joined: August 30, 2010
- Location: Chicago
-
-
don_johnson Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7398
- Joined: December 4, 2008
- Location: frozen tundra
-
-
don_johnson Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7398
- Joined: December 4, 2008
- Location: frozen tundra
^^ see? right there, you chose tans as the "scummiest. but you didn't vote him. instead you waited and placed your vote on me, which at the time, was basically a "policy" type vote.jesse wrote:If I had to pick one as being the scummiest I'd pick tanstalas.
can someone other than jesse comment on my earlier post? i don't do these ground-breaking iso analysis' for nothing ya know...town 39-32
mafia 17-9
sk 0-6-
-
JesseSheffield Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 362
- Joined: August 30, 2010
- Location: Chicago
DJ you should know by now that there is a world of difference between identifying a player as acting the scummiest and your top scum suspect. Sometimes they're the same player, a lot of times they're not. tanstalas was a player who I believed acted very scummy near the end of D1, like I stated in the above quote. But that did NOT make him my top scum suspect. Get it straight DJ.And who's going to stop me...-
-
don_johnson Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7398
- Joined: December 4, 2008
- Location: frozen tundra
i got it. you prefer policy lynching over lynching people you find scummy. completely contrary to what you said earlier in the game during your fluffy, theory discussion with robo on day 1.
unvote, vote: jesse
not sure whether you are chainsawing for CSL or moth, but your attacks on lowell and myself are baseless, reek of policy, and run contradictory to your own expressed opinions.
would love some more comments on this...town 39-32
mafia 17-9
sk 0-6-
-
Lowell Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6318
- Joined: July 25, 2006
-
-
don_johnson Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7398
- Joined: December 4, 2008
- Location: frozen tundra
yeah. people always joke about it, but noone pays attention when i post actual thought out posts. so whatever. sheffield is full of shit(no offense). and noone seems to care, even when i point it out. whats the point of putting effort into the game when... hm. i think i need an alt. this reputation seems to kill my game.town 39-32
mafia 17-9
sk 0-6-
-
mothrax Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1711
- Joined: July 3, 2010
- Location: Here, There, Everywhere
-
-
don_johnson Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7398
- Joined: December 4, 2008
- Location: frozen tundra
-
-
JesseSheffield Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 362
- Joined: August 30, 2010
- Location: Chicago
-
-
JesseSheffield Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 362
- Joined: August 30, 2010
- Location: Chicago
-
-
don_johnson Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7398
- Joined: December 4, 2008
- Location: frozen tundra
-
-
mallowgeno Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1244
- Joined: May 26, 2010
Maybe if you didn't joke around so much people would see it. I don't see it either Moth. This is why I shall...don_johnson wrote:yeah. people always joke about it, but noone pays attention when i post actual thought out posts. so whatever. sheffield is full of shit(no offense). and noone seems to care, even when i point it out. whats the point of putting effort into the game when... hm. i think i need an alt. this reputation seems to kill my game.
unvote
for now.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.