Open 258 --- Night Watch --- Game Over
-
-
andrew94 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4045
- Joined: May 5, 2010
- Location: dota room
whats the chance that they kill one of the watchers
2/9.
like i said, if the watchers fcking watched me last night like they were supposed to, they can totally not follow this plan.
they can work out who each other are already, following the number plan, the lower number watch me, and the higher number watch nameloc or someshiti hate walls, i will only skim walls.-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
ooBAZZoo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 169
- Joined: July 7, 2010
How did you work out it was 2/9? As far as I'm aware, there are 10 players remaining, two of which are the scum themselves, which leaves 8. But then we should assume that scum have no reason to doubt your cop claim, or nameloc's hider claim (assuming they did actually target nameloc and fail), which means there are only 6 players who could possibly be watchers, making it 2/6 (or 1/3).
I agree that Dryfit's play D1 reads scum. He appears to bus Joystick slightly when it appears that Joystick is definitely going to be our lynch, but never really commits to and accusation, or a vote. I'm gonna do a re-read of everyone though, and give Dryfit a chance to post. Since he was so inactive (only posted 5 times) I get the feeling he might be replaced; if not, he needs to stop lurking.
FoS: Dryfitx-
-
nameloc1986 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 424
- Joined: September 11, 2010
Actually it's even higher than that. If Andrew reveals the "vanilla" player and we lynch him as his "plan" suggests, then it will be 2/5 prob if that person is NOT scum (40%). We can't afford to help the scum snipe the watchers so Andrew please DON'T reveal who you targeted.ooBAZZoo wrote:How did you work out it was 2/9? As far as I'm aware, there are 10 players remaining, two of which are the scum themselves, which leaves 8. But then we should assume that scum have no reason to doubt your cop claim, or nameloc's hider claim (assuming they did actually target nameloc and fail), which means there are only 6 players who could possibly be watchers, making it 2/6 (or1/3).Town Record: 2 - 3
Scum Record: 1 - 0-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
Actually I like Andrew's lynch the vanilla plan.
As a second point of order has anybody thought about getting the watchers to claim. Get them to agree to protect Andrew (2/5) of the each and the other watch (3/5) then we'll be able to have all of our three vulnerable PR's protected (more if our hider hides behind one of them.) If we do go that route then obviously Andrew shouldn't claim his result yet (use it to disagree with a false claim.)Plus, if you guys want to make a point, skip the walls, because everyone else in the game does as well. - Magister Ludi-
-
nameloc1986 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 424
- Joined: September 11, 2010
Yeah, but then the watchers will be exposed themselves. There are only 2 watchers and 4 PRs (2 watchers + 1 hider + 1 RC).
Look there's a good chance that the watchers know each other already. I say we just go through the day like normal and we try and lynch someone we think is scum. If someone tries to claim watcher, then all we have to do is get that watcher to watch Andrew, I'll hide behind the "claimed" watcher and the "unclaimed" watcher will watch the "claimed" watcher. My death will expose the "claimed" watcher as scum and Andrew will live another day. So if someone claims watcher, then we can be pretty sure they're telling the truth. Plus it may only take one CC to disprove someone as watcher (if the watchers know each other). Whatever we do, if we put someone at L-1 and they claim townie we need to lynch them anyway. If we disband the bandwagon on them and force someone else to claim, we'll help the scum at watcher sniping.
But let's stop worrying about "plans" that AREN'T foolproof and actually do some old fashion scum hunt.Town Record: 2 - 3
Scum Record: 1 - 0-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
They won't because they also have a 60% chance of being watched as opposed to the 50% chance of just being killed randomly.nameloc1986 wrote:Yeah, but then the watchers will be exposed themselves. .
Nameloc, is shotty your main suspect?Plus, if you guys want to make a point, skip the walls, because everyone else in the game does as well. - Magister Ludi-
-
jasonT1981 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9671
- Joined: June 15, 2009
- Location: Mourne Mountains
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
how do you know joysticks wants to replace him? EDIT, nevermind, emp is cleared, so your thoughts on this now?andrew94 wrote:empking is scum becos joystick wants to replace him
Name is “cleared” claiming hider, who hid behind empking who is also cleared…Andrew is “cleared” being an uncountered cop.
this is not a good plan and is assuming a lot.andrew94 wrote: if not, this is the plan. tonight, nameloc hide behind me 2 watchers both watch me
I agree with Empking (the only fucking time you will ever hear me say this)…the watchers should claim and (andrew’s) vanillas should be lynched..
Right now we have 10 players left…
Emp (“hid behind”), Andrew (not countered cop), and name (not countered hider) are semi cleared…
That leaves 7, assuming that the 2 watchers are not Emp if they claim, that will leave 5 vanilla (also assuming that scum will out fake claim)…
If we kill a “vanilla” every night…we win…..
this is a good point too....ok, scratch the first...I think the watchers should claim if we get ready to lynch someone and that person claims watcher.nameloc1986 wrote:
Look there's a good chance that the watchers know each other already. I say we just go through the day like normal and we try and lynch someone we think is scum.
---
That being said,
Vote Antihero.
1.) tried to derail the hop wagon yesterday with….saying that Andrew claimed he was lying (which I don’t recall seeing). Name called him out on this and he quickly changed his vote back. But even before that, he was trying to discredit Andrew (257) saying that “vanilla” is against what the mod said. This was well before he “thought Andrew admitted to lying”.
2.) misrepresented me in the game…”you are playing under the radar” when indeed I was busy (RL) and couldn’t post….he should have known this because I had to do the exact samething in another game we share…OORR, he could have easily checked my past posts to see if I was active in other games…he chose to push my lynch (based on no scum hunting at all) over the hop lynch.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
nameloc1986 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 424
- Joined: September 11, 2010
TBH, not really but I don't know who my main suspect would be. Shotty I've noticed has a bad case of saying something before he thinks it through and is famous for referring to something as a gambit when it really was just him being stupid. I actually get more of a town read than a scum read from him TBH. That said, when I look back at my FOS from earlier, I think it was just him not thinking it through. I called bullshit on him for what he replied back with. I think he was trying to keep himself looking stupid. I don't completely rule him out either though.Empking wrote:Nameloc, is shotty your main suspect?
My current gut feelings: BAZZ &Antiheroare town & Jason & maybe Zdenek are scum.
P. Edit: hmmmmm.......you actually bring up good points about Antihero....this may need some looking into...Town Record: 2 - 3
Scum Record: 1 - 0-
-
nameloc1986 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 424
- Joined: September 11, 2010
-
-
Dry-fit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1971
- Joined: May 29, 2009
- Location: Florida
As far as the role/nightaction speculation goes, I agree with what name said in post 430.
I unvoted because my previous vote had been on andrew (all but confirmed role cop) and I didn't vote hop because I wanted to give 2k3 a chance to post.Antihero wrote:The fact that dry-fit never got a vote out yesterday also bothers me a bit...
It hadn't even been twelve hours since the thread openednameloc1986 wrote:Lurkers, come out wherever you are and comment on what's taken place so far this day.
I don't have time now but should be able to do some isos and give suspects in a few hours.Andy Murray: Two time Wimbledon and one time US Open Champ! Former world number 1!
C'mon Andy!-
-
Antihero al;kdjfal;kj
- al;kdjfal;kj
- al;kdjfal;kj
- Posts: 15872
- Joined: March 30, 2009
Noandrew94 wrote:whats the chance that they kill one of the watchers
2/9.
9 players - you - the hider (loc) - 2 scum = 5
2/5
CKD, I corrected myself when I said I thought andrew was lying. I even said in the post why I thought that.
Also, I said a million times, the number of posts didn't bother me; it was the active lurkerish style of the posts.The distance between insanity and genius is measured only by success.-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
Antihero al;kdjfal;kj
- al;kdjfal;kj
- al;kdjfal;kj
- Posts: 15872
- Joined: March 30, 2009
Yeah, I didn't know whether or not to believe andrew's claim, so what? With jason advertising the fact that andrew has an aweful track record with fakeclaiming as town, I'm surprised more people didn't question the claim.
Well, let's go back to this gem.
Everything is either a) stuff echoed from other players or b) a crappy jab at shottyThe distance between insanity and genius is measured only by success.-
-
andrew94 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4045
- Joined: May 5, 2010
- Location: dota room
-
-
Zdenek Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6827
- Joined: August 30, 2010
I do not like Shotty's erratic play, and almost constant rolefishing. However, most of it was pointless questioning of Joystick.
I still don't like CKD's play from yesterday, and I wouldn't be surprised if he was busing Joystick. I also don't think his his case on Antihero holds much water: I don't think doubting Andrew a bit was the worst thing someone could have done, and Antihero hardly pushed CKD's lynch over Joystick's. However, I want to do a more careful read through with the new information in mind before passing judgement.
I am still thinking about all of the schemes that have been presented. I don't have a well formed opinion on them yet, but I guess at the moment I am opposed to them. I've mostly just looked at how they might obviously fail, and not much on what we could do to avoid it. Nameloc's comment makes the most sense: if scum claim watcher, we have a method to determine it they are telling the truth, and we should lynch scummy players who claim vanilla.I have secret plans and clever tricks.- The Enormous Crocodile.-
-
andrew94 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4045
- Joined: May 5, 2010
- Location: dota room
-
-
drmyshottyizsik Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6872
- Joined: July 2, 2010
- Location: Under A Bus
-
-
nameloc1986 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 424
- Joined: September 11, 2010
-
-
drmyshottyizsik Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6872
- Joined: July 2, 2010
- Location: Under A Bus
-
-
andrew94 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4045
- Joined: May 5, 2010
- Location: dota room
-
-
Antihero al;kdjfal;kj
- al;kdjfal;kj
- al;kdjfal;kj
- Posts: 15872
- Joined: March 30, 2009
-
-
drmyshottyizsik Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6872
- Joined: July 2, 2010
- Location: Under A Bus
-
-
Antihero al;kdjfal;kj
- al;kdjfal;kj
- al;kdjfal;kj
- Posts: 15872
- Joined: March 30, 2009
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.