Star Wars Quote Mafia- Game over

[elvis_knits]

o rly?

(this too, is a joke)

[Fritzler]

(this too, is a joke)

Don't worry, I unlike most people here apparently, can pick up on a joke.

[elvis_knits]

I <3 u Fritzler

[Fritzler]

Ummmm, ok, thanks.

[PeaceBringer]

Where's Peacebringer?

sorry hadn't checked in during thanksgiving weekend-and the other day went way too fast and was a dense day.

[PeaceBringer]

okay, 2 to me are suspect at the moment-

Ranger of North and Elvis_Knits

Vote Ranger of North

[elvis_knits]

I was about to say I was happy you got here...

[rajrhcpfreak]

o wow... i was confusing this with another game i was in... with PB....

[BabyJesus]

vote peacebringer

[Thoth]

My guess for the 'boring conversation' role would be a day vig. That would usually be enough for me to vote him as more often than not this is a scum ability. This time, in the light of his quote, it looks much more like a protown one though.

[Mr Stoofer]

I've lost enthusiasm for the Dranko bandwagon.

now the quotes need to quarantine the

bad quotes

before they continue their bad... or something

This seems to be saying that the mafia are bad quotes [rather than "non-quotes"].

I could believe that there could be an anti-town role in the game that wasn't a quote at all -- I'm thinking of an SK who was a non-Star Wars fan deleting all the quotes from the database. But there are no signs of an SK in this game.

I am still annoyed with Dranko for taking 4 posts to give an explanation for something lots of people had asked about . But for the reasons given above I think that his explanantion is most likely true. So I'm going to

unvote: Dranko20

and have a re-read.

[Mr Stoofer]

My thoughts (alphabetical order):

elvis_knits

: I find his posting weird. He gave a strange, unconvincing reason for not voting armlx (post 103). Trying to push the bandwagon on the townie forward without ending up on it? (See also comments on RangeroftheNorth below.)

Then when he applied the finishing vote to armlx (post 110) he was very defensive about it: "I'm sort of nervous to put on the lynching vote (as I never have before), but the evidence is overwhelming. Does it get any better than this?" Why do defensive? Because he knew armlx was pro-town?

Simialrly, when he voted Dranko20 (post 130) he was at pains to point out that someone else was pushing the bandwagon.

Post 159, where he unvotes Dranko, also seems defensive - trying again, too hard IMHO, to justify his initial vote on Dranko20.

Fritzler

: He has said out loud more than once that he was badnwagon hopping. Now Fritzler does like to jump on bandwagons when he is pro-town, but I wonder if he is making too much of the fact? Does he think we won't be suspicious of him if he makes light of what he is doing?

Fritzler also pushed Thok for his role name (post 89) in circumstances where there was no point - Thok had proved his ability.

RangeroftheNorth

: Ironically, I'm a bit suspicious of him for not voting armlx. The evidence against armlx was overwhelming and the only reason I can think of that a player would have for not voting him is being scum, knowing that armlx was going to be lynched by the town and keeping yourself off it. Much more importantly, RangeroftheNorth has made a huge deal about how he didn't vote armlx (e.g. post 162). I wonder if kept off armlx deliberately (knowing armlx was pro-town and doomed) so he could use this argument.

SOS

: He has not contributed much and what he has said has been wierd. Post 132 was just bizarre.

In post 141 he tried to push the town to lynch Dranko without an explanation: "I'll give him the chance to say something in his defense, if he does not... Then let's lynch him anyway". This is even more blatant in his next post (143) -- in response to Ranger saying "I guess we're all waiting for Dranko", SOS said: "But let's not wait too long, if he starts lurking now he's a goner". This is especially suspicious since it was Thanksgiving weekend, so Dranko20 could have a reasonable excuse for being absent for a few days.

Thok

. A small point, but I was surprised at his post 155. I'm amazed that Thok missed Norinel's point about the quotes coming from his memory - he is not a careless player in my experience.

Thoth

: I thought post 99 from Thoth was odd. He agreed with a strong anti-armlx post from ibeasha, but didn't vote armlx. Instead he said he wanted to hear more from armlx before adding his vote. But armlx had already claimed. Nervous about getting on a bandwagon of someone he knew to be town? His post 184 is also odd.

[Mr Stoofer]

Sorry for the triple post - I forgot the most important bit:

Vote: elvis_knits

.

[Thoth]

Thoth: I thought post 99 from Thoth was odd. He agreed with a strong anti-armlx post from ibeasha, but didn't vote armlx. Instead he said he wanted to hear more from armlx before adding his vote. But armlx had already claimed. Nervous about getting on a bandwagon of someone he knew to be town? His post 184 is also odd.

I missed the roleclaim obviously (and was not the only one in that looking at some later posts)

What is odd about my 184 post? I gave my opinion on the naked one's quote.

[Fritzler]

My thoughts (alphabetical order):

elvis_knits

: I find his posting weird. He gave a strange, unconvincing reason for not voting armlx (post 103). Trying to push the bandwagon on the townie forward without ending up on it? (See also comments on RangeroftheNorth below.)

Then when he applied the finishing vote to armlx (post 110) he was very defensive about it: "I'm sort of nervous to put on the lynching vote (as I never have before), but the evidence is overwhelming. Does it get any better than this?" Why do defensive? Because he knew armlx was pro-town?

Simialrly, when he voted Dranko20 (post 130) he was at pains to point out that someone else was pushing the bandwagon.

Post 159, where he unvotes Dranko, also seems defensive - trying again, too hard IMHO, to justify his initial vote on Dranko20.

That's a she.

Fritzler

: He has said out loud more than once that he was badnwagon hopping. Now Fritzler does like to jump on bandwagons when he is pro-town, but I wonder if he is making too much of the fact? Does he think we won't be suspicious of him if he makes light of what he is doing?

Fritzler also pushed Thok for his role name (post 89) in circumstances where there was no point - Thok had proved his ability.

Meh, fair enough. I wanted the role name, because I wanted to hear the quote. IF the bad quotes are evil, or non existent quotes or whatever, ,he'd have a hard time thinking of a quote not used, but that is common enough to not look out of place (at least I know I would).

unvote, vote: elvis_knitts

[zu_Faul]

[quote=Thok"]
vote zu_faul for his post 158.
[/quote]

FOS

Thok because he made a post. [/sarcasm]

[zu_Faul]

vote zu_faul for his post 158.

FOS

Thok because he made a post. [/sarcasm]

[Norinel]

Vote Count:

Dranko20- 4 (RangerOfTheNorth, TSAGod, Shamrock, rajrhcpfreak)
RangerOfTheNorth- 2 (zu_faul, PeaceBringer)
PeaceBringer- 2 (

BabyJesus

)
elvis_knits- 2 (Mr Stoofer, Fritzler)
Shamrock- 1 (Dranko20)
zu_faul- 1 (Thok)

Not voting (6): elvis_knits, ibaesha, Quailman, Thoth, PBuG, SOS

10 to lynch.

[elvis_knits]

Stoofer -- First of all, I am of the female persuasion. (I know it can be confusing with a name like Elvis, but I am a "she.")

Anyway, you are right about me being cautious about putting the finishing vote on armlx, mostly because I have been lynching wrong all the time lately. You can take a look at Newbie 149 if you don't believe me. When you put all my posts together like that I can see how it looks apologetic, but really I was just tring to explain my reasoning.

elvis_knits

: I find his posting weird. He gave a strange, unconvincing reason for not voting armlx (post 103). Trying to push the bandwagon on the townie forward without ending up on it? (See also comments on RangeroftheNorth below.)

My reasoning for not voting armlx at that time was that I thought him and RangeroftheNorth were both scum and I didn't want a landslide bandwagon on armlx before everyone had a chance to read and post. Also, I thought RangeroftheNorth was scummy too, so I don't see why that's a bad vote on my part.

Then when he applied the finishing vote to armlx (post 110) he was very defensive about it: "I'm sort of nervous to put on the lynching vote (as I never have before), but the evidence is overwhelming. Does it get any better than this?" Why do defensive? Because he knew armlx was pro-town?

Here I follow through on my accusations on armlx's scumminess. What's wrong with that? First you'r criticising me for not voting armlx, then you're criticising me for voting him. Seems you want to criticize me either way.

Simialrly, when he voted Dranko20 (post 130) he was at pains to point out that someone else was pushing the bandwagon.

I said I liked

your

reason for voting Dranko. I agreed with it. And who are you to criticize me for voting based on a reason you used yourself? How can you criticize me for agreeing with you?

Post 159, where he unvotes Dranko, also seems defensive - trying again, too hard IMHO, to justify his initial vote on Dranko20.

I don't know where I was defensive here. At least I changed my vote when I got an explanation from Dranko. You said you didn't believe dranko's explanation until the bandwagon had lost steam. Seems to me you only unvoted Dranko when you realized you couldn't get the lynch.

[SOS]

SOS: He has not contributed much and what he has said has been wierd. Post 132 was just bizarre.

Armlx said that 'if a lynch or lose situation pops up, the mod tells me'. He made a finishing vote on thok, trying to quicklynch him, or so it looked. btw it's weird, not wierd.

In post 141 he tried to push the town to lynch Dranko without an explanation: "I'll give him the chance to say something in his defense, if he does not... Then let's lynch him anyway". This is even more blatant in his next post (143) -- in response to Ranger saying "I guess we're all waiting for Dranko", SOS said: "But let's not wait too long, if he starts lurking now he's a goner". This is especially suspicious since it was Thanksgiving weekend, so Dranko20 could have a reasonable excuse for being absent for a few days.

well, stoofyboy, I knew it was thanksgiving, so I would have taken that into consideration. A lot of people were voting for him because he was seemingly scummy. I actually gave him the chance to defend himself, so that a quicklynch could not take place.

[ibaesha]

I've been out of town and really busy for the last week. I'll catch up on the thread and post something tonight or tomorrow.

[PeaceBringer]

vote peacebringer

hi

[Astaroth]

vote peacebringer

hi

[BabyJesus]

unvote, vote elvis_knits

[elvis_knits]

astaroth, how did you get out of pooky mafia?