Mini 1069 - Hospital Madness Mafia (Game Over!)

[Tasky]

I think I can agree with a TL lynch.
UNVOTE: VOTE: TheLonging

[chesskid3]

bump. Seriously. This is shameful

[Exe]

Sorry, classes have been nuts lately. Let's see here.

Your case on TL is actually decent, but I hadn't gotten a strong scum-vibe from his actions myself yet. I am still favoring NS at the moment. I'd like to see how TL responds.
It seems like pretty much no one is going to post before deadline, and I'm obviously not in favor of a no-lynch, D1 no-lynch pretty much fucks the town. So if the TL wagon gets to L-1 before deadline, I'll hammer.

[TheLonging]

CHARNEL'S ROLE IS MORE LIKELY A SCUM ROLE THAN NS'S.

THE INVERSE IS TRUE IF CHARNEL IS TOWN, BUT THAT'S NOT LIKELY.

NS IS MORE LIKELY SCUM THEN CHARNEL.

scumhunt, and do not pr-hunt.

But I did scumhunt, and I do believe you are scum, more likely than NS. I also believe chesskid can still be scum.

@TL, so you would be willing to lynch someone on day 1 because his role claim might be slightly more scummy then another guys, even though his play is town. Did I say that correct?

Except Charnel's play isn't exactly town, even ignoring Moo's play. You're right except for that last part, where replace town with scummy

And if by lurking, you mean I was grounded, then yes I was lurkinng.

[chesskid3]

way to ignore my case. bad scum.

[Uprising]

My vote stays where it is.

Only 3 more Charnel votes to avoid nolynch, guys, come on.

WTF. You want to convince people to vote for me, not because you think I'm scummy, but because "the deadline is coming"?

The fact that NS leaves his vote to force a deadline lynch on me is scummy as hell.

confirm vote NS

This is NS as a pure survivalist, he doesn't bother with looking for scum.

I honestly managed to miss him saying that


I agree with Charnel's interpretation of this.

I do not like this at all.

[chesskid3]

I'll say it again. NS is playing to survive, but he's not a good lynch.

[Zang]

The case on TL is really good and the fact that he ignored it means that he can not answer it or isn't reading the thread. I still think uprising is scummy but his lynch can wait.

Unvote
Vote: TheLonging

[Uprising]

I don't disagree with you, chesskid.

Betting scum won't kill him.


TL isn't making sense to me anymore.
He may be scum, and is likely a good lynch. I want to see if he replies to it before I vote him.

And yeah, I don't think Charnel is scum anymore.
My vote and feelings on him had NOTHING to do with the fact he voted me, just for the record.

UNVOTE:


Sorry I haven't posted since the 26th, I feel bad about that.
Also, I'm sorry I say sorry a lot. It's a bad habit.

[chesskid3]

well of course he won't die to scum, that's why we have Cooldog

[Wingless]

I had not enough time to read all, I read it to page 20. I am thinking about NS and Up now. I am away tomorrow but not at saturday. The deadline is so close.
I don't want to lynch Charnel now.

Unvote

[chesskid3]

How many people in this game don't read threads?

[Uprising]

So, at this rate, pretty sure we'll force a nolynch. Just sayin'.

I've been reading.

[chesskid3]

Yes I know, I was talking about TL,Wingless,NS,Slaxx who are either here and useless or not here and thus useless

[chesskid3]

Also TL can respond to my case at L-2/L-2 just as well as he can at L-4, and we won't get a NL that way.

[Parama]

Day 1 Vote Count #20

[3] Nobody Special

- CooLDoG, Exe, Charnel

[3] TheLonging

- chesskid3, Tasky, Zang

[2] Charnel

- TheLonging, Nobody Special

[1] Uprising

- Enigma

[0] Enigma

-

[0] Exe

-

[0] CooLDoG

-

[0] chesskid3

-

[0] Tasky

-

[0] Wingless

-

[0] Zang

-

[0] Slaxx

-

Not Voting (3): Slaxx, Uprising, Wingless

With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch. Deadline is 10/31/10 at 9 AM CST. (Less than 3 days!)

I'm *pretty* sure nobody is due for a prod at this time, since I just checked every player's ISO. Still, if someone is, please tell me. I'm going to restart my prod table when I get home so this should stop being an issue.

[TheLonging]

way to ignore my case. bad scum.

I did read your case, and there's pretty much nothing to respond to. Because I have responded to a lot of these before.

[chesskid3]

A significant portion of my case is based on you flip-flopping repeatedly/ denying buddying and then actually buddying.
Humour me, post a defense.

[TheLonging]

BTW, scum is Charnel, chess, and... to be honest I couldn't say who else. I guess Exe but that's not a solid suspicion.

[TheLonging]

A significant portion of my case is based on you flip-flopping repeatedly/ denying buddying and then actually buddying.
Humour me, post a defense.

OK, your case is formatted confusingly imo. Hard to read. So, can you specifically point out buddying instances?

[chesskid3]

....Nobody else seems to have had a problem with it. My case is a bunch of posts from your ISO, or quotes thereof. Your stances change wildly, you distance from NS then buddy him then distance etc etc etc. It's all there.

[TheLonging]

The case is formatted confusingly and it's hard to find specific instances.

[Uprising]

It is formatted a little confusingly, I'll admit that.
But still, there must be a way to decipher it.


VOTE: TL

[Nobody Special]

I am here, and am reading, and -- contrary to what YOU may think -- I am NOT useless.

unvote

Vote: TheLonging

[chesskid3]

That's L-2, and Exe has expressed a willingness to hammer.
Either actually defend yourself, or just claim.