Oh, please, like that's the only thing your slot's done. And since you were only at 3 votes at the time, the drama isn't needed.Toon Fighter wrote:dammit, why do I put myself in these situations? I just confused chrono with sakshijain. I know, its a stupid mistake, but its just a mistake. If you want to lynch me for it, go ahead and do it
StrangerCoug wrote:VOTE COUNT
Antihero (1): chesskid3
chesskid3 (3): xvart, manho, Reckamonic
Chronopie (1): Twomz
Me=Weird (1): Tasky
mothrax (7): Parama, The Stove, Lady Lambdadelta, Antihero, smargaret, Espeonage, Chronopie
Tasky (1): Me=Weird
Toon Fighter (1): mothrax
Not voting (1): Toon Fighter
This is a pretty big shift. And looking back at mothrax's posts, I'm not really seeing any content there.StrangerCoug wrote:VOTE COUNT
Antihero (1): chesskid3
chesskid3 (3): xvart, manho, Reckamonic
Chronopie (1): Twomz
Me=Weird (1): Tasky
mothrax (5): Parama, The Stove, Lady Lambdadelta, smargaret, Espeonage
Toon Fighter (4): mothrax, Antihero, Chronopie, Me=Weird
Not voting (1): Toon Fighter
Lulz. On a couple of levels.mothrax wrote: I have not played with Zito, but I can be pretty sure that he is not a player who jumps onto wagons opportunistically as town.
I've already explained this.Tasky wrote:someone explain me why mistakenly voting own slot predecessor is scummy please.
If you want to write off the accidental self vote as an honest mistake, fine. That's a matter of personal interpretation. But the second line is still a blatant rolefish, and I think he deserves my vote just for that.AH wrote:1) I suspect the hilarious accidental self-vote was prompted by Parama's last post (buddying).
2) The vote is a self-vote. Not paying attention, again.
3) That second line is a blatant rolefish.
Congrats, Me=Weird, for the single scummiest post of the game. You say BE was scummy but you don't feel like writing out why (I see a trend developing here of nobody wanting to actually talk about why BE is scummy). And then you ask for a good case to sheep off of? How does this make any sense? Why not use your original justification for the slot being scummy? You need to sheep a vote because you have a case but are too lazy to write it?Me=Weird, 677 wrote:BE was scummy, but I don't feel like writing out why. mothrax hasn't helped the slot, so can someone make a good case for me to sheep off of?
Tasky: Why do you want to lynch me? So far, it's seemed like you're just attacking me because I attacked you.
What do you mean, personal meta? What is transparent about me?Lady Lambdadelta, 679 wrote:Yeah! Let's just use a PERSONAL META to determine a lynch, with no other cause or justification!
Don't make me laugh. The non-existance case against smargret is almost as transparent as you are.
Do we have any OTHER takers? Anyone ELSE want to make a lynch suggestion before we continue to lynch mothrax?
As in, you are most confident about your reads at the top of their respective lists? Why are you voting for the person on your scum list that you are less confident than everyone else on your scum list?The Stove, 705 wrote:Order matters yes. AGar and I more-or-less agree on the placement of all of these.
smargaret wrote:Toon Fighter's vote just proves that there have been too many replacements this game.
let's say 60%, but additionally it is very important for us that I determine whether my theory is true.smargaret wrote:Mothrax still needs to die. Tasky, how sure are you that he'll die tonight? I'll move my vote if it's inevitable.
Can you please show me one post from that player slot that's NOT incredibly scummy?Espeonage wrote:Can someone please show me a Toon Fighter case that does not include where he voted himself please.
