Mini 1069 - Hospital Madness Mafia (Game Over!)

[TheLonging]

Also don't misrep me, The TL lynch is a scum lynch AND an information lynch. It clears NS, and we lynch scum. DOUBLE WHAMMY

he says this while misrepping a lot of my case which I already addressed (the "buddying", contradictions), which he just ignores while slapping his cock around calling me scum.

[TheLonging]

Nevermind. TL needs to die today, Uprising living another day is not a problem.

Look how many people offered to hammer TL, and nobody did. Something's up here.

and you said nobody should hammer a page ago[/b[

[TheLonging]

@TL: In the past few days as your lynch has been hanging at L-1, do you still feel the same way about your scumreads? This answer is important to me.

I still find chesskid scum.

I still find Charnel scum, but mostly because of what moospiker has done now as opposed to moospiker's play + his play in general, seeing as how he's now actually using logic.

I still find NS VI, but would I be surprised if he was scum? No, he'd just be VIscum, and that's the problem with reading someone

[CooLDoG]

Dude, thread exploded!

@person who suggested that thinks I am saving UP... I don't find him scummy as of yet, more stupid and I think there is a better lynch.
@NS, why is TL scummy? You thought he was scummy enough to hammer….
@TL, why is Charnel so scummy as to say that he is one of your top scummy players? And elaborate a bit on Chesskid’s scummy ness, I get a null from him…

[Enigma]

2 days till deadline and people are still fucking indecisive.

Either choose to commit to an Uprising lynch or say you are going to stay on the TL wagon and want to see him hanged.

Even though NS has answered my Q about his role, I'm still not satisfied about the mechanics of the role and still view it as a fake claim.

[CooLDoG]

2 days till deadline and people are still fucking indecisive.

Either choose to commit to an Uprising lynch or say you are going to stay on the TL wagon and want to see him hanged.

Even though NS has answered my Q about his role, I'm still not satisfied about the mechanics of the role and still view it as a fake claim.

He speaks the truth! I'm going to stay on a TL lynch till the end of this 30 page day... I still have a vig to think about so if we don't have a lynch (which I pray we will have a lynch) I will for sure kill. I say that again if we have a no-lynch I will kill... No worries, but I think TL is a lynch worthy target and a good d-1 lynch. I will be voting NS first thing day 2. I might not be able to post for then rest of the day. I just wanted to throw out that part about me viging in case of no-lynch.

[chesskid3]

Just vig any of Zang,Exe,Uprising,Wingless and you'll be helping town.

[chesskid3]

throw NS on there too.

[TheLonging]

@TL, why is Charnel so scummy as to say that he is one of your top scummy players? And elaborate a bit on Chesskid’s scummy ness, I get a null from him…

For one, all of moospiker's play, and when he first came in, his catch-up play just seemed like a weak attempt to look town by going along with popular opinion, he's changed a bit from this though so he's dropped a bit.

[TheLonging]

Well for one, he's misrepped me on his whole "case", and he's made up shit (buddying, contradictions) to try and get a lynch on me. That and he himself has contradicted himself a couple of times (especially on NS)

[chesskid3]

TL, maybe I would changed my vote to Uprising if you actually made an effort to defend yourself. You read as scum resigned to getting lynched. You never actually defended yourself, as you claim. Rather, you said my case made no sense, and that was all you said.

[chesskid3]

Oh and where did I contradict myself, hmm?

[Parama]

Day 1 Vote Count #23 (Again)

[6] TheLonging

- chesskid3, Tasky, Zang, Uprising, CooLDoG, Nobody Special

[3] Uprising

- Enigma, Charnel, Lrdwhyt

[1] Nobody Special

- Exe

[1] Charnel

- TheLonging

[0] Enigma

-

[0] Exe

-

[0] CooLDoG

-

[0] chesskid3

-

[0] Tasky

-

[0] Wingless

-

[0] Zang

-

[0] Lrdwhyt

-

Not Voting (1): Wingless

With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch. Deadline is 11/03/10 at 9 AM CST. (Less than 48 hours!)

TheLonging is at L-1.

[Uprising]

So you can mock me, chesskid? </3

[Uprising]

Erm... is it unnatural for a single day to go on this long? 30 pages, I mean...

TL, Charnel isn't scum. Do you intend to leave your vote there?

[chesskid3]

Uprising, when TL flips scum, yeah I'm going to mock you.

Also you seem to have an awful lot of people who aren't scum, and yet all you've said about people you think _are_ scum is that I pinged your scumdar.

[TheLonging]

TL, maybe I would changed my vote to Uprising if you actually made an effort to defend yourself. You read as scum resigned to getting lynched. You never actually defended yourself, as you claim. Rather, you said my case made no sense, and that was all you said.

Because your case doesn't make sense. Your "contradiction" claims make no sense, and neither do your buddying claims because THEY ARE NOWHERE TO BE FOUND.

TL, Charnel isn't scum. Do you intend to leave your vote there?

Yes.

[Nobody Special]

I could be persuaded to switch my vote to Uprising.

Just sayin.

[chesskid3]

or someoen could just hammer >_<

[Wingless]

I need to reread this all before hammering. I could do some of it tomorrow, i'll have time.

[Lrdwhyt]

I cannot explain my behaviour.

My suspicions...
I don't think chess is scum because he thinks I'm scum, ftr.
He is being overly eager about getting TL lynched ASAP.
I'm probably wrong, but it's fine. If he dies and I'm wrong, I'm sorry.

Wingless isn't giving me scumvibes and his recent posts don't show him as scum to me.
Ditto for Enigma.

Is that an outright refusal to explain, or what? Are you claiming that there is no change in behaviour, or that you have a reason for not wanting to explain?

or someoen could just hammer >_<

I found your case for lynching TheLonging inadequate, as I said in a previous point. Do you have any other reasons, or is that all you have to say about him? I responded to most of your case earlier, it would be nice if you would respond to that, if you're really so committed to this TheLonging lynch.

I could be persuaded to switch my vote to Uprising.

Just sayin.

It's been explained several times before. I don't think you're stupid enough to need a personal explanation.

[Nobody Special]

I could be persuaded to switch my vote to Uprising.

Just sayin.

It's been explained several times before. I don't think you're stupid enough to need a personal explanation.

Okay, so, for the dense among you:

I wouldn't need "persuasion." It's a FANCY WAY OF SAYING I'D SWITCH.

(See? There's the difference between us. I

do

think you're stupid enough to warrant a personal explanation.)

[chesskid3]

I think he's scum. His refusal to actually defend himself, and the fact that you had to do it for him doesn't help. Sure you can explain away his scumminess, but given the little he has contributed, and the resulting scumminess, I like my vote. I like the wagon.

[TheLonging]

I am defending myself, you're ignoring it to try and convince yourself I didn't defend yourself.

[Tasky]

FoS: chesskid3