/confirm
Let's kick off this game as quick as possible!
Random votes are a GO GO GO!!!
The reason? He knows what I know and therefore too much!
Hi Mr.You-Are-My-Top-Scum-Candidate-ATM! If you want to vote someone, you must click on "Reply" to make a proper post. On the "proper post" you must make your "Vote: someone" in Bold. just like KittyMo said in the basic rules.Huntman800 wrote:Hi, I'm excited for my first game, so let's get this started!
VOTE: SomeRandomGuy
(Reason? Random.org spat out 4)
Wassup man.ooBAZZoo wrote:Hey. Looking forward to playing with you all. Just a few random questions I like to throw out so we can all get to know each other like special friends
1) Have you played mafia games before? (on this site, other sites, or in real life)
2) Where are you from?
3) Why the profile name?
4) Do you believe anyone caught lying should be lynched?
i didnt say that. You are definitely town-read on me. However, the attitude is quite disgusting.Thor665 wrote:So, you're settling on calling me scum?
And what is my attitude overtaking? My previously town attitude?
Rather than telling other people to do things you would do, why don't you try to convince them in a way that they can actually see and understand your purpose?Thor665 wrote:@Huntman - The truth is that as you play the game you'll end up developing your own scum hunting style. Pretty much everyone does it differently and it really does take reading/playing games to learn what you'll start noticing as tells. The best and most basic advice is - say what you're thinking, and never get too locked down in preconceptions. If you can master that you'll already be leaps and bounds ahead of a lot of other players of this game. I actually disagree about the way you're reading Maniamax, but can see where you're coming from. The sad truth is pretty much every tell is pretty subjective and needs to be assessed on a case by case basis.
I'm still null on Mania, but if I can get a read on Guderian I'll probably have a more solid feel there.
Still think park is the strongest scummer thus far.
@mothrax - Huntman is town, get your vote off of him, please.
A small incorrectness here. Yeah there are two scums but you only get to vote one at a time.Guderian wrote:small incorrectness here. there are two scum and from a towns point of view they themselves are town. so its actually 2/8=1/4. very different.
Ok, Thor. Tell me why I'm scummy to you.Thor665 wrote:In regards to my town read on Huntman?parknourie wrote:Rather than telling other people to do things you would do, why don't you try to convince them in a way that they can actually see and understand your purpose?
The reason is - Huntman is looking like lost newbie player and the *first* action he takes when trying to respond to my demands for reads on players is to explain why we should *clear* a player of suspicion. That's just not a scum mindset, especially not for a player who isn't even under a lot of pressure. Only way I see Huntmanscum at this stage is if Mania is his buddy.
Also, the above is pretty much ironing out my parknourie as scum feeling. Just look at how he's responded to me;
1. Calls me town for voting him (!?!)
2. Presents that really odd 'Thor is town who is angry he's not scum' deal (he's really darn sure I'm not scum, isn't he? I have no idea why, I've been townie, but I'm hardly super townie.)
3. Asks for clarification of my town read on Huntman.
4. Has yet to ask question 1 about my case on him...seriously, he hasn't even questioned why I have such a strong scum read on him yet. Can we say guilty conscience?
3 wouldn't be so exciting without 4, of course. Clearly he does understand the concept of explaining reads, he just doesn't want to hear the scum case on himself.
Ahh.. i get you now. How foolish of me to push on that my-logic but not do it myself.Thor665 wrote:Let me break it down for you.parknourie wrote:@ Thor - Why would you ask me something like "Why don't you vote Mothrax?"? Did you? Did Anyone? With what reason except for his jump on the popular wagon?
You say you are town.
You say I am town and am voting you for 2 reasons;
1. Because I am not scum
2. Because obviously one hlaf of the scum team will be either an IC or an SE and I know it's not me.
You're an SE.
I'm an IC.
You think/know we're both town.
Who does that leave as the obvious scum? The other SE. Mothrax. Why, by your logic, are you not voting him? He has to be scum, right?
Hmm...I think I shudnt have boasted and thought I was the man from the start of the game. Turns out that I was the noobiest-of-them-all.ooBAZZoo wrote: Again, Park, you seem to be under the impression that at least one IC or SE is chosen to be scum because of their experience (correct me if I'm wrong about this). This is not the case, all player's roles are chosen completely at random by a random number generator.
Apparently, I'm back.chkflip wrote:How do you guys not realize parknourie is trying to float through this phase?
chkflip wrote:@parknourie:
- Claim.
Packbat wrote:I'm still slogging through D1, but as long as you're asking politely, let me point out:andrew94 #603 wrote:^ only when someone wishs to hammer, he/she will ask to claim
parknourie #43 wrote:Greetings Andrew. Gimme 100 good reasons why I should unvote on you (actually a good "one" would do).
The fact that you just got in doesnt count at all.andrew94 #61 wrote:@park dude ur vote on me is a random voteand:parknourie #71 wrote:@@Vote: Guderianparknourie, claim.parknourie #71 wrote:p.s. High five Andrew
Well, I personally thought that too.Neruz wrote:I seriously don't see how Gude was so scummy, if i'd been here from day 1 i probably would have been going after you or possibly Thor.
Eheheheh, guess I was lucky even to have survived Day 1.Guderian wrote:That damn parknourie. I don't even remember why I unvoted him in the beginning as well. So close.
Also, Thor, I did think your case on me was kind of shoddy. That whole unvote debacle I am rereading and remembering :p!