to not commit to wagons [he realises] are being ridden by scum." - but hang on, you got on and then off that wagon three times over it's course. That looks less like "not committing" and more like "hopping on and off as it becomes useful" to me.
Espeonage wrote:Yeah K. LLD is town.
That's a hell of a turn-around.
Interesting to see Baby Spice's PR was confirmed before her lynch.
Parama wrote:StrangerCoug wrote:
Blooderection (2): Parama, Antihero
Baby Spice (1): The Stove
Cool kids vote these wagons.
Bad scum make these kind of posts. Just saying.
Nobody Special wrote:Baby Spice wrote:Here's the entire context. So, how does parama's quote subvert the meaning of the last sentence?
Duh, because it was
obviously refering to the so called case on LLD,
not the game in general which was what Parama was implying. If that's not quoting out of context I don't know what is. Then his excelent reposte of "No I didn't".
Not at all obvious. Backpedal much? IGMEOY.
I could see it perfectly fine. This is why I feel more than a little bad about many of the people pushing the Baby Spice wagon at this point (page 10).
The Stove wrote:
@Esep, Framm:
BE can wait. We'll lynch BS today. We'll get rid of scum AND an annoying PR. It's like a twofer.
Bad, naughty, dirty, evil post, this part especially.
Espeonage wrote:@ Stove,
The case is good but my gut's not in that one at the moment.
That is liable to change though but for now I am happier on BE.
Emphasis mine because holy crap, a good case > gut feeling for a townie any day.
Twomz wrote:I got chocolate bubblegum.
Antihero wrote:BE wrote:1. its NOT an aweful reason to vote someone.
Seriously?
Who here thinks it's OK to vote someone just because of a VT claim?
I think it's perfectly acceptable.
@ Babyspice: You seem to be attacking the people who are attacking you for no real reason, could you list your suspects and say why they are your suspects? And if someone quotes the relevant part of your post and comments on it in a way you don't like, you say that they're misinterpreting it, cause it's in the correct context, you just weren't clear enough and they interpreted it in a way you don't like.
I think I understand the reasons for the BS wagon, but could someone explain the reasons for the BE wagon? I think I missed it.
unvote
"I'm going to ask someone to provide content on a level I have singularly failed to match all game, and ask someone to tell me why I should hop our new wagon so I don't have to waste time reading or actually contributing."
Tasky wrote:this game is going way to fast for me. don't have enough time.
so expect me to lurk a little.
don't let that distract you.
If you find scum, tell me.
STABBY STABBY BLOOD KILL KILL KILL
No but seriously, this is a ridiculous amount of active lurking at this point. NS's hypocrisy on the point is not-oh, right, already dead. Wake up, KoCk.
...why am I being Bel-Air'd in Italian?
This:
Blooderection wrote:Unvote:
Vote: Baby Spice
is a really bad thing and I am entirely unsurprised this slot was lynched D2 after Blooderection's hijinks. My predecessor shows how to put together a vote properly below. My predecessor was awesome, I'm going to be a let-down.
After Baby Spice's 289, I do wonder how on Earth she was lynched. It seems like a turning point from OMGUS (which is a null-tell IMHO at best) to actual town-esque attempts at reasoning - even if said reasoning was rather misguided, and still lightly OMGUS flavoured. Oh well.
Oh, hey, manho does exist. Wow, that's some fantastic excuse. You only just found out day started, despite everyone presumably getting a role PM with a link to this thread. Okay then. Oh, and you're still alive?
Tasky wrote:huh. I still have my vote on espeonage?
time to push a wagon
unvote
,
VOTE: Blooderection.
You are putting me dangerously close to wanting to do you a violence, sir.
Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Sorry guys. Been really busy. >.<
Let me read again, and provide more evidence for why I think Baby Spice should get lynched.
Not "who I think we should lynch" or even "if the BS wagon is not BS", but "Let me read again, and provide more evidence for why I think Baby Spice should get lynched.". The push on Baby Spice is a foregone conclusion, and LLD is taking a lynch choice, then reading to justify it, instead of reading and then pushing a wagon based on that.
LLD's "read again" ends up just focusing on one post of BS (her most recent one) and either calls her thoughts "meaningless conjecture" (whut) or calls for a policy lynch because of "Why me?", which is a pretty null-tell, if not exasperated PR/newb tell.
Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Antihero, can we please lynch BS before BE? She's so much scummier than he is.
Is it just me, or did LLD get away with pretty much anything she liked after her initial wagoning?
Twomz wrote:But won't it just explode? Just like this...KABLAM!
unvote, vote: Baby Spice
(L - 4)
Besides backwards/flawed voting logic (others have pointed it out, I don't even know what to say to it... providing reasons for votes is scummy? wtf), I agree that deflecting and the 'Oh woe is me' defense are two major scumtells (I was gonna say 'accurate' but scumtells are rarely accurate).
"OOH, ME TOO! MEEEE TOOOOOOO!"
This quote irks me for some reason:
Antihero wrote:Why would NC pretend to think that Baby Spice was faking her post restriction?
...why the assumption that he was pretending?
manho wrote:why is Baby Spice still alive. he's the most obvscum i've seen.
BE's vote on LLD is not a scum tell to me, as i always thought that lynching a claimed VT is standard procedure.
LLD is town for the reaction to the his own lynch.
Tasky is scum for unwilling to read and scumhunt.
M=W is scum for doing nothing but pushing the well-established wagon on LLD and BS.
someone do an ISO on Twomz will find that if you remove the PR-first liner, he has no content at all. so he's scum also.
parama is town. and i will think the stove is town if not agar did the great job in the original SWNIII as scum.
other is a no read or no time to read for now.
VOTE: Baby Spice
So, your contribution is to piggyback on everyone else's opinions, and to push on M=W (aka MY GOOD SELF SIRRAH) with no evidence and pretty shabby reasoning. Ooooookay. Oh, and then more V/LA. Sweet.
Tasky wrote:I think this game will be more fun if we put someone to L-1:
UNVOTE: VOTE: Baby Spice
Wut.
Tasky wrote:smargaret wrote:I don't like Tasky's vote. It seems very opportunistic - that's the first time he's mentioned BS. Also, his only other non-random vote was to push an existing wagon.
UNVOTE: Nobody Special
VOTE: Tasky
I'm still semi-v/la, but I will try to post more.
I
AM
pushing wagons, yes. SO WHAT? is that scummy?
I like bandwagons.
Doublewut (smargaret makes a good point about his vote, lovely town points for you ma'am)
Wait, that was the hammer? SO, Tasky didn't actually check to see how the votes stood before going in? Hooooo boy.
Oh, wait, he was a ROLE COP?
Oh wait, he wasn't. SC, you so silly.
Oh... ouch. SC trying to rival Wisborg Asylum and Chzo Mythos Mafia for goriest flavour, now?
The Stove wrote:
DEAR SCUMZ
If you want to gg right now it's cool with us.
vote: Blooderection
AGar and I need a chance to talk about all these awesome events.
This reaction. I don't like it. Very, very tryhard.
smargaret wrote:Blooderection is the play today. I'm not joking.
VOTE: Blooderection
Or giving a reason, I see.
Ah, the hammer wasn't Tasky's fault. Fair enough then. Wonder if that really
was
a miscount by SC, though.
Antihero wrote:smargaret wrote:Blooderection is the play today.
I concur.
VOTE: Blooderection
SURE IS GIVING REASONS IN HERE
Re: xvart in Post 429 (P18) - second-guessing whether the mod has put all restrictions on one side or not is a really bad idea in bastard mod games, and should be avoided. Judge them on their behaviour, and all alike, not on their posting restriction. Having said that, I will now completely contradict myself and admit I would be entirely unsurprised by the guy speaking Italian being a Mafioso.
BloodErection goes into full "LOL U ALL SUCK" mode and I would bet HEAVILY it was Covenant doing most of the posting here.
smargaret makes the exact point I am - modWIFOM = bad. modWIFOM in a bastard game = HOLY SHIT SON WHAT ARE YOU DOING
Antihero wrote:xvart, please stop failing and read the thread.
Blooderection wrote:Yo... so why am i still the best lynch for today?
I don't know, why was BS the best lynch for yesterday?
Yo... might I add that if we had lynched the claimed VT.... WE WOULDN'T HAVE LYNCHED THE COP!
Yo... might I add YOU WERE ON THE WAGON!
Vote: Tasky
-gives off major scum vibes to me.
You can drop the act now. You're fooling no one.
It's funny because you were pushing BS for most of Day 1 too. Yessss... Your hypocrisy nourishes me.
Mmm. I love statistics. Wait, what am I saying, I hate this, and it's all fucking irrelevant PR distribution speculation.
Espeonage wrote:k then. VOTE: BE
Son, I am disappoint.
SO. MUCH. SETUP. SPECULATION. In a bastard game. Jesus, guys, have you never learned your lessons?
Tasky wrote:I'd prefer if we do not lynch Blooderection today, there is something I have to check.
So, please, let us look elsewhere for today and not lynch him today.
We can lynch him tomorrow, but if my theory is right, he should die anyway tonight, so no need to waste our lynch on him.
I have a good reason for this. can't tell you, obviously.
N.B.: I am in no way suggesting that BE is town, nor have I any reason for not wanting his lynch tomorrow or later.
Reeeeally, now. Give reasons when you make posts like this, don't softclaim and leave everyone hanging.
Parama wrote:StrangerCoug wrote:Lady Lambdadelta (9):
, Parama, Espeonage, Me=Weird, Antihero, Twomz, Reckamonic,
, chesskid3, (
)
Hmm.... There's 1 more scum max on this wagon, I'd think.
Well, that's convenient.
smargaret wrote:Tasky, I have reasons relating to my role why BE should be the lynch today.
Also, the PRs were not assigned based on math majoring, because that's what I finished college with (algebra, not stats, and I'm not up for discussing math in Italian).
OH FOR GODS SAKE
Twomz wrote:You can't hide forever! And if you can, then I'll wait forever!
No, you don't have to redo the math, the math is retarded and pointless. The fact that there was a 'post restricted cop' flip means that either there is a 'post restricted mafia' role or there isn't... 50% either way. If there is more than one scum PR, then it will become apparent as the game progresses... this whole 'lynch PR players instead of scum hunting' trend is retarded...
In fact,
vote: xvart; FoS: Anyone else who even considered it
.
LOGIC! AT LAST!
Parama wrote:Antihero is town <_<
That's a big leap to make. Not just "probably town" but "is town". 100% certainty. Hm.
Antihero wrote:In reality, the fact that he does while he is voting for me to believe that BE is trying to set up another misslynch the guy who speaks Italian.
Also, I'm not voting for you.
Try again, please.
Not voting =/= not setting up a lynch.
The Stove wrote:chesskid wrote:This is not scumhunt the PRS, this is scumhunt who is frothy.
So. Much. Lulz.
But I completely agree with the sentiment. This whole "let's go down a lynch list lol" is fucking stupid.
Parama wrote:Who said I posted no substantial information?
Me.
Dear kids wanting Blooderection case,
Plz to be doing iso on Blooderection and posting results.
Love,
PZ
P.S. Antihero is town, wasted vote is wasted.
P.P.S. The more xvart posts, the more I want him shot.
Those post-scripts... again, with nothing to support these huge jumps. Hrm.
Espeonage wrote:I know I didn't post a real BE case. It was kinda obvious. Look at the points where I mention he is scum and then look at the BE posts preceding it. Is fair obvious.
Nopenopenope. You don't get to do this. You damn well say what you find scummy, not just "it was obvious".
Right, that's gotten me to Page 20. Will finish the last 18 pages later and give final thoughts.