Star Wars Quote Mafia- Game over

BabyJesus · Post Post #250 (ISO) » Sat Dec 03, 2005 5:44 am

Fritzler wrote:Why is Quailman not lynched yet?
Slackers.

I agree with this guy

Quailman · Post Post #251 (ISO) » Sat Dec 03, 2005 6:22 am

RangeroftheNorth · Post Post #252 (ISO) » Sat Dec 03, 2005 6:56 pm

Shouldn't you guys at least have a reason to be lynching quailman?

BabyJesus · Post Post #253 (ISO) » Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:05 am

RangeroftheNorth wrote:Shouldn't you guys at least have a reason to be lynching quailman?

no

elvis_knits · Post Post #254 (ISO) » Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:20 am

BabyJesus wrote:
Fritzler wrote:Why is Quailman not lynched yet?
Slackers.
I agree with this guy

*won't give into peer pressure*

rajrhcpfreak · Post Post #255 (ISO) » Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 am

comon honey,

you know how pissed off when a day comes to a standstill.

elvis_knits · Post Post #256 (ISO) » Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:46 am

Yeah, but you're cute when you're mad...

rajrhcpfreak · Post Post #257 (ISO) » Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:48 am

Norinel · Post Post #258 (ISO) » Sun Dec 04, 2005 7:04 am

Activity check: Prodding ibaesha, Thok. Next check Wednesday, the time of this post give or take.

And I know there's only been one vote change, but:

Vote Count:

Quailman- 7 (

BabyJesus

, Dranko20, PeaceBringer, rajrhcpfreak, Fritzler, TSAGod)
Dranko20- 2 (RangerOfTheNorth, Shamrock)
PeaceBringer- 2 (Quailman, PBuG)
elvis_knits- 1 (Mr Stoofer)
RangerOfTheNorth- 1 (zu_faul)
zu_faul- 1 (Thok)
Mr Stoofer- 1 (elvis_knits)
Thoth- 1 (SOS)

Not voting (2): ibaesha, Thoth

10 to lynch.

Thok · Post Post #259 (ISO) » Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:24 am

Am here, not sure for the reason for the Quailman bandwagon, and I haven't seen anything else better to do.

I need to compare my bandwagon and Quailman's bandwagon to see if there are any common factors-that's a likely source of scum (assuming Quailman isn't scum).

RangeroftheNorth · Post Post #260 (ISO) » Sun Dec 04, 2005 9:08 am

As far as I can tell there is no reason for the quilman bandwagon

Fritzler · Post Post #261 (ISO) » Sun Dec 04, 2005 9:24 am

RangeroftheNorth wrote:As far as I can tell there is no reason for the quilman bandwagon

FOS: RANGER

[/b]

Dranko20 · Post Post #262 (ISO) » Sun Dec 04, 2005 10:01 am

someone else vote quailman for god sakes

Thok · Post Post #263 (ISO) » Sun Dec 04, 2005 10:13 am

As far as I can tell the Quailman vote is a repsonse to his vote of BJ/FOS of Peacebringer. I can see some people having reasons to vote Quailman based off of those things, but I'm vaguely surprised that Dranko or TSAGod is on this bandwagon.

In fact I'll

unvote, vote Dranko

. One of the interesting things about your claim is that its a quote said by many people throughout the Star Wars Movies. If we have a cult (although I dont know if this is likely/possible), that quote is part of it.

BabyJesus · Post Post #264 (ISO) » Sun Dec 04, 2005 10:16 am

RangeroftheNorth wrote:As far as I can tell there is no reason for the quilman bandwagon

well you are voting for Dranko who has claimed a quote - do you have a reason why you think his quote is a "bad" quote?

Dranko20 · Post Post #265 (ISO) » Sun Dec 04, 2005 10:16 am

we already had this discussion, maybe try again tomorrow, after some cop investigations?

Thok · Post Post #266 (ISO) » Sun Dec 04, 2005 10:36 am

Wait, duh, I'm confusing Dranko's quote with armlx's quote. Duh.

unvote Dranko

for the moment.

Shamrock · Post Post #267 (ISO) » Sun Dec 04, 2005 11:13 am

So, can we hear a reason for the Quailman bandwagon, BabyJesus?

BabyJesus · Post Post #268 (ISO) » Sun Dec 04, 2005 12:29 pm

Shamrock wrote:So, can we hear a reason for the Quailman bandwagon, BabyJesus?

no

rajrhcpfreak · Post Post #269 (ISO) » Sun Dec 04, 2005 12:40 pm

the question is... y not?

is there a good reason not to?

SOS · Post Post #270 (ISO) » Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:30 pm

Reason for the bandwagon is that babyjesus is incredistupid and fritzler has a lack of love, dranko doesn't know anything, peacebringer mad about the modkill in the other game, raj is sexually frustrated and TSAgod an idiot.

unvote

.

imbeciles

Mr Stoofer · Post Post #271 (ISO) » Sun Dec 04, 2005 10:48 pm

I'm keen to get this game moving, but since this is day 3 I'm not going to move my vote to Quailman (or anyone else) without

some

reason. I'm not looking for a guilty result from a confirmed cop with guaranteed sanity. Just some argument in favour. At the moment Quailman is not even a blip on my scumdar.

Mr Stoofer · Post Post #272 (ISO) » Sun Dec 04, 2005 11:35 pm

OK its day 2 but the point still holds.

BabyJesus · Post Post #273 (ISO) » Mon Dec 05, 2005 12:09 am

SOS wrote:Reason for the bandwagon is that babyjesus is incredistupid and fritzler has a lack of love, dranko doesn't know anything, peacebringer mad about the modkill in the other game, raj is sexually frustrated and TSAgod an idiot.

unvote
.

imbeciles

Oh yea, your contributions so far have been phenomenal.

Thoth · Post Post #274 (ISO) » Mon Dec 05, 2005 1:02 am

Let me try then.

I think the argument against Quailman is that he voted PB for lurking (and attacked BJ for unvoting PB) where PB had posted just the day before that (more recent than Q himself). Both were away before that because of some weird American holiday. In that light Quailman's vote seems rather strange to me as well.
Add to that that he checked in several times, but gave no explanation for this I can understand people voting for him.

The thing I don't like about this bandwagon is the speed with which it started and the fact that noone typed out their reasons and just voted, making it especially easy for scum to hop along.