@CollidAnon
My reason for not asking ChannelDeliBird is simple.
ChannelDeliBird wrote:I might not be read up for a couple of days, in the process of catching up with a couple of other games right now,
He has yet to post.
My non-committal stance is also good to ensure I don't end up vote-hopping like a deranged frog. I have a few suspicions at the moment and I am unsure who I should push for.
You seem to say that voting is locking to an opinion, I have several opions and none I currently wish to "lock" to.
What's more scum like to you? Vote-Hopping or no vote with 17 days until the dead line? To me its vote-hopping. If we were closer the the deadline I would happily vote.
CollidAnon wrote:How would you know that when they weren't posting thoughts to begin with?
Because lurkers are in the inside and still build their own opinons and such as the game progresses. As such you could say we see the game in progress in parts, whereas you come in and get to see the game so far in whole.
@TSQ
What reason would a townie have for posting that? Scummy was probably the wrong word to use it seems. I have scummy defined basically as "Not something a townie generally would do", not "what scum is more likely to do than town". (Yes there is a difference)
---
I'm having trouble understanding StrangerCougs post... from what I can figure he is supporting CooLDoG's pursuit of getting TSQs establishment out of him...
And seeing as people are pressuring for votes