Day 1 I take it you agree with Implosion on me. Day 2, I've certainly spent mostly asking questions about/arguing with points of other people's cases, rather than picking a particular person or two and going headlong after them. (Case in point, my last post). Don't forget that I haven't even cast a vote today, while you're at it. It is what it is. *shrug*mykonian wrote:General passive play, by both players using that slot. Little to no scumhunting and an extremely hesitant start. If your lucky I'll get you quotes at the end of the night.
Deadline's coming, so I'm going to have to offer a definitive case and a vote, but at this point it will seriously be as rickety as everything I've seen from everyone else today.
People asked me to explain why I had a town read on lew. I didn't think HE was completely legitimate, I thought his differentiation between the DJ and mallow vote was completely legitimate, and that Gonzoooo was wrong to go after him for that.mykonian wrote:After that Lew gets buddied. He was "completely legitimate". PO is taking. Oh, PO is going to like me too (I'm not English either!). And then the "thank you" to gonzo who thought consig was town. Another attempt at buddying.
Aside from Gonzo's buddying of me (and me of him?), do you have any other reasons right now you think he's scummy? There's some stuff that naggles me, but someone would have to show me that his defense of a VI and his shutdown of any vig discussion have probable reason to be scum-motivated before I'd vote for him. I'm occasionally paranoid enough to dismiss the first, but the second one especially is a high price to pay just to solidify one's position as town.
Getting there, man. I think your strongest point against Implosion has to do with his treatment of the vig discussion, and zeriong in on you over lew. Hence why I'm relooking at the whole vig thing. You were asked for a bullet-point case on the guy to summarize all those walls of text, you never gave it, so I'm going with what I can get as I find it. Your initial reason for your vote is terribad. So hells yeah that increases my suspicion of you.don_johnson wrote:i actually like the PO case here. PO's last post seems to be trying to pigeonhole my implosion vote by tieing it to the post in which it was initially laid down, but not responding to any of the walls of text that i subsequently posted. nor does it address implo's play at all. its just kind of a sideways stab at a vulnerable player(me). plus, i like myk.
don_johnson (2) - smashbro_of_the_SSS, implosion
Purple Orange (2) - mykonian, don_johnson
smashbro_of_the_SSS (1) - vollkan
Not Voting (4) - Purple Orange, lewarcher82, ThAdmiral, Gonzoooo
With 9 alive it is 5 to lynch. The deadline is set for the end of December 13th, PST.