Vote: Dana
Youre useless, like Bobsnox. Your lack of American pride is disturbing. If you arent going to assist us in catching the communist scum, you are clearly a communist sympathizer.
What exactly would be the point of it? If we are lynching scum, and their choice is to die by lynch or die by nuking town, are they really going to recall it? If we are lynching town, why would you ask them to resign their fate in the game?chesskid3 wrote:I just had an amazing idea.
Come D1, if the failsafe is town, they can claim, and we can pseudo lynch, with the victim (if they have a silo) being required to nuke the failsafe, then cancel the launch, and someone else can be lynched.
Would that work?
This is a terrible line of thought.gandalf5166 wrote:Why would the failsafe be town? If any member of the town put failsafe anywhere on their list, they need to die now.
As is this.chesskid3 wrote:If there's no Failsafe claim then we know it's scum.
This is a better line of thought.chesskid3 wrote:Make people claim their submitted lists before they die.
Toogeloo wrote: You went swinging after me when I jabbed at you the scumminess of a policy lynch, you jab at chess because he mentions not liking you in DEFCON 5. I'm sure anyone else who mentioned you at some point was called scum by you as well, though I would have to go back and check for sure.
Friend wrote:So, I've seen this exchange far too often:
Person A makes poor case and vote on person B.
Person B points out why that case is poor, votes Person A.
Person A just yells "That's OMGUS," discrediting person B without really responding to the points against him.
This is a problem. It's not OMGUS if you make a scummy case on me and I vote you for that case. If you had made that case on another player, I would be voting you for the same reasons. But because your case was directed towards me, it's OMGUS and therefore invalid?
Also.Toogeloo wrote:This was over 3 hours ago now... you got anything yet?Kitoari wrote:/prod dodge
Playing catchup now.
You have to realize, there hasn't been a case on Fate until recently. He gets butthurt that someone mentions something he does as being scummy, and he turns around and proxy votes the player before they build a case. It's not that a case is poor, but if someone says, "hey, that was scummy," and then Fate goes, "oh yeah?! well, VOTE: You!," that is what is thinly veiled OMGUS.Kitoari wrote:Friend wrote:So, I've seen this exchange far too often:
Person A makes poor case and vote on person B.
Person B points out why that case is poor, votes Person A.
Person A just yells "That's OMGUS," discrediting person B without really responding to the points against him.
This is a problem. It's not OMGUS if you make a scummy case on me and I vote you for that case. If you had made that case on another player, I would be voting you for the same reasons. But because your case was directed towards me, it's OMGUS and therefore invalid?
from the first post by mod here skipping duplicate words
[NORAD SYSTEM] Playback complete.Whatever.
Appear clean dare fyi furry -naturally.