Mini 1091 Mafia Mania -- Game Over
-
-
moose200x
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
brokenscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 776
- Joined: December 1, 2007
Okay, these are just the unordered thoughts I have after reading through the thread...
I didn't really find moose scummy in that their posting could very easily (and I think likely does) come from a town player who often slips into poor play. The main reason I feel he can feel/be anti-town is that his posts are so chaotic at times that is almost impossible to try and work out what sort of thought processes and motivations are behind them, which isn't exactly helpful when working out motivations for actions is one of the main aspects of scumhunting.
moose: please fully claim, your non-specific power role claim doesn't really help anyone right now, one of the main reason I can think to not fully claim is that you haven't got a decent lie; if you are telling the truth about your PR it isn't a good look, you already look bad enough from claiming when you probably shouldn't have.
I've noticed some players seem to want moose dead as a policy lynch; I don't think this'd be a very good idea, firstly I don't think he is as malicious as the targets of policy lynches tend to have to be and is not as big a threat to the town (he is, I think, also capable of much better play than currently shown), secondly I don't think we would gain nearly as much information from a moose lynch than we would from some other lynches, more on this later. (Also there is the whole power role claim, but I'm going to wait for more to go on here)
Some things made Hiraki look fairly anti-town as I read through the thread: the weird opinions expressed on lots of pretty pointless seeming, often theoretical, bits of the game (RVS, pressure, FoS), the relative lack of cohesive cases against players considering his expression of so many strong opinions on presently irrelevant topics, and the constant introduction of relativity into his posts ("that might be true for you, but it isn't true for me"; generally your use of this pretty silly, a lot less of these things are as relative as you seem to think they are). Would be interested to know if other players consider this more poor town play or scummy play, I'm having a hard time working out.
I'm liking the beefster wagon at the moment, I think I'll leave my predecessor's vote there for now. The way he targeted boberz really rubbed me the wrong way, don't think he has contributed much to the town, and there are some interesting relationship between beefster and some other players that I've noticed which could be very revealing depending on how he flips, will look into in these (and hopefully other) relationships in more detail after a nice sleep, I feel thats an aspect that hasn't been looked into as much this game.-
-
boberz Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: November 15, 2009
- Location: Southend-on-Sea, Essex, England
-
-
Beefster Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2117
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Colorado
There's no need for him to claim at this point. He's softclaimed a power role and that's enough. I just want him to stop his "I hate having a power role" crap. If he hates it so bad, why doesn't he replace out instead of screwing with the game?brokenscraps wrote:moose: please fully claim, your non-specific power role claim doesn't really help anyone right now, one of the main reason I can think to not fully claim is that you haven't got a decent lie; if you are telling the truth about your PR it isn't a good look, you already look bad enough from claiming when you probably shouldn't have.
This reads to me as buddying. Also, why do you care so much that he claims? You don't think he's scummy; there is no good reason for him to claim.brokenscraps wrote:I've noticed some players seem to want moose dead as a policy lynch; I don't think this'd be a very good idea, firstly I don't think he is as malicious as the targets of policy lynches tend to have to be and is not as big a threat to the town (he is, I think, also capable of much better play than currently shown), secondly I don't think we would gain nearly as much information from a moose lynch than we would from some other lynches, more on this later. (Also there is the whole power role claim, but I'm going to wait for more to go on here)
This looks like an excuse to fencesit for a while. What dobrokenscraps wrote:Some things made Hiraki look fairly anti-town as I read through the thread: the weird opinions expressed on lots of pretty pointless seeming, often theoretical, bits of the game (RVS, pressure, FoS), the relative lack of cohesive cases against players considering his expression of so many strong opinions on presently irrelevant topics, and the constant introduction of relativity into his posts ("that might be true for you, but it isn't true for me"; generally your use of this pretty silly, a lot less of these things are as relative as you seem to think they are). Would be interested to know if other players consider this more poor town play or scummy play, I'm having a hard time working out.youthink?
Are there any other accusations you'd like to bring to the table?brokenscraps wrote:I'm liking the beefster wagon at the moment, I think I'll leave my predecessor's vote there for now. The way he targeted boberz really rubbed me the wrong way, don't think he has contributed much to the town, and there are some interesting relationship between beefster and some other players that I've noticed which could be very revealing depending on how he flips, will look into in these (and hopefully other) relationships in more detail after a nice sleep, I feel thats an aspect that hasn't been looked into as much this game.
VOTE: brokenscraps
BTW: I'm done warming up. I can be serious now.On hiatus indefinitely. This was a nice distraction when I was working through my faith transition out of Mormonism, but I need to move on to bigger and better things now.
Get to know a meat boy-
-
Beefster Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2117
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Colorado
Could it be that you realized I'm town?boberz wrote:All the stuff you said about hiraki was scummy.
Something is off with the beefster wagon, cant fathom itreally. I need to reread the game already.On hiatus indefinitely. This was a nice distraction when I was working through my faith transition out of Mormonism, but I need to move on to bigger and better things now.
Get to know a meat boy-
-
brokenscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 776
- Joined: December 1, 2007
Beefster wrote:There's no need for him to claim at this point. He's softclaimed a power role and that's enough. I just want him to stop his "I hate having a power role" crap. If he hates it so bad, why doesn't he replace out instead of screwing with the game?
I'm just going to really hope moose isn't a vanilla townie making a fakeclaim or that he isn't exaggerating his PR's significance, as I read in this thread that he showed regret for doing this in another game.Beefster wrote:This reads to me as buddying. Also, why do you care so much that he claims? You don't think he's scummy; there is no good reason for him to claim.
If he is really a town power role the scum already know that he isn't a scum player, that he is the only claimed power role and that his power role is apparently very useful to the town. The exact details of his power aren't too important, already they know he would be a good target for killing off.
If he is scum making a fakeclaim, however, then we are losing a lot of potentially useful information that denies us the opportunity to scrutinize and test his claims. Being able to just claim PR makes it too easy for scum.
So if he is town we won't lose anything from a full claim, and if he is scum his claim will be much easier to check, so I think that now that a soft claim has been made there is good reason for a full one.
You've changed your mind very quickly as well:
Right here you seem to call for more claiming from moose. Whatever opinions suits the lynch you're looking for, eh?Beefster wrote:
Cut the crap. What are you hiding?moose200x wrote:Just let me do my thing for one night and if I am alive you lynch me fast. No argument from me.
Fair enough. It comes off to me much more as always playing that way both judging from a quick glance at his previous games and the general read I get of his motivations this game, so more as anti-town than scummy. Now using previous bad play to justify current bad play creates a general site meta of encouraging bad play, so I don't think it's good to use this to clear him, and if boberz and anyone else in favor of a Hiraki lynch can provide a stronger case (mainly who do you think his scum partners are?) then I would be paying much more attention.Beefster wrote:This looks like an excuse to fencesit for a while. What doyouthink?
While reading the thread it seemed like there was some time of connection between you and Mariyta, I would see this as a possible scum team.beefster wrote:Are there any other accusations you'd like to bring to the table?
I found Mariyta's vote on boberz fairly odd. Same post she seems to want to put a vote on moose but doesn't because that would put him at l-2 (it would actually put him at l-3, but that is neither here nor there); I don't think a quick lynch was a reasonable threat here, and if you really thought he was the scummiest why wouldn't you want to vote him? Later in the game you would write:
Why should you vote for someone you consider the lesser scum just because they don't have a wagon? Trying to get votes on somebody else would only distract from moose. The overreacting charge seems a very weak reason for voting for boberz here.Mariyta wrote:Why should I vote the person I feel is the lesser scum just because he has the wagon?
So I found this vote odd straight away, and it really set alarm bells off when beefster, with his first actual game post, voted for boberz with almost the exact same reason (switching from overreacting to Hiraki to overdefensive to Hiraki). Of course it seems odd that scum would play together like this, but there doesn't seem to be any intention from beefsters of creating a connection between him and Mariyta shown in the post, just a mutual attempt to start a boberz bandwagon for fairly weak (and similar) reasons.
Mariyta's later posts show some signs of too strong attempt to separate herself from beefster:
-Her post fourth post is fairly odd: boberz has made both one of the scummiest comments and isn't very scummy, and the attacks on boberz by beefster are ridiculous despite her being the source of the attacks main argument (overreaction/defense) and maintaining that the overreaction is one of the scummiest things so far. She then claims beefster as her second scum pick despite not really providing a case against him, although she doesn't place a vote on him (2nd scum pick seems a pretty easy way to bus without much consequence). The case against LC is also pretty weak, seeing as a large number of players had been fairly inactive at that time and she doesn't provide much to differentiate him from them. The lack of posts is perhaps suspicious, but to have that alone as your reasoning for top scum pick?
-Her vote on beefster has been provided with little reason; yes he was her second scum pick, but could we get some of the reasons why? The ones given don't seem very strong. It only places him as l-4, so I could see it as bussing; I could also see it as an unfortunate (for her) combination of her previous placing of beefster as a second scum pick for bussing purposes and the common procedure of cleaning the slate a little for replacements.
@beefster: mind outlining the case against me?-
-
Substrike22 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 718
- Joined: July 13, 2010
- Location: Northern California
@ Mod, requesting V/LA 2-4 days. Probably won't need it, but I'm moving home from university for winter break and I may not have a place to set up my computer with internet right away, but I'll try. This is just a precaution so I don't get replaced.
Also if anyone sees me "browsing" the forum during this time, it'll be on my smartphone, and I'm not trying to post a case on someone with a touchscreen, sorry. Not to mention that I'm pretty ok with my vote at this point. Gonna have to read brokenscraps' walls of text here before I get a good post up... will be coming as soon as the computer is set back up.-
-
Ant_to_the_max Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 871
- Joined: May 7, 2010
So, this is were my inexperience kinda pops up.
I wasn't sure if the Moose thing should have been pursued or not...
Big thing I am waiting for now is thisbrokenscraps wrote: You've changed your mind very quickly as well:
Right here you seem to call for more claiming from moose. Whatever opinions suits the lynch you're looking for, eh?Beefster wrote:
Cut the crap. What are you hiding?moose200x wrote:Just let me do my thing for one night and if I am alive you lynch me fast. No argument from me.Apologies for falling off the face of the earth.
I'M BACK BABY FOR A LIMITED TIME*!-
-
Dekes Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1190
- Joined: July 10, 2010
- Location: Germany
@Substrike
Reading is tech.
I used the mighty word "if" regarding any possible vig. If you want data, I just checked the last 5 completed mini normals, and three of them had (One-Shot) vigs. In any case, I was merely pointing out that moose had been not productive for town and yet not remarkably scummy and those people are usually better vig targets than lynch targets.
Moose's softclaim episode was just ugh. Dude, you really oughta smoke some pot before visiting this site to calm the hell down. There was no need at all to softclaim there. Enough people were clearly against your lynch.
I personally believe the softclaim but anything beyond that about how poweful that role is seems like some poor gambiting by moose. In any case, we should know more tomorrow.
@AntB
Do you have any other suspects? You seem to be hardcore deadset on moose and moose only. Tunneling is not a scumtell at all, but you should try looking at the bigger picture and ponder every possibility like moose being town. Who else do you find suspicious?
Don't like boberz' latest lazy behaviour. Since his latest wall o' text post mainly with Hiraki all he did was giving out some snarky one-liner opinions without backing any of them up.
If you think Hiraki is scum, then present a solid case and I'll look into it. I don't know about the others, but I began skimming over Hiraki and your wall o' text wars after a while. And unless one of you flips or comes on my scum list I'm not interested at all in seeing who's winning the "Is an FOS a scumtell or not"-debate.
And finally,
Unvote; Vote: Beefster
Yep, I know I said Beefster was town. But that was based on the fact that Substrike (one of my suspect) had Lord Chronos (my other suspect), Beefster and moose as suspects and yet decided to avoid the Beefster wagon (where LC was on) and LC and instead went moose - me - moose. But now that brokenscraps has somehwat redeemed LC, it seems that LC was rather disinterested in the game than scummily lurking. So that voids my theory of Substrike avoiding a wagon where his partner is on if brokenscraps is town.
Beefster's discrepancy between saying "moose has to fullclaim now" and "there's no point for moose to claim" within two posts is just too hard to overlook. I'll look into Beefster later for more, but the vote seems good for now.
Also, I'm sick at looking at the moose wagon. Too bad a Substrike wagon wouldn't liff off. With the only person softclaiming moose has painted a bull's eye on his back anyway, and even if not, dude said, he could prove himself tomorrow. So what exactly is there to gain if we lynch him today?-
-
boberz Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: November 15, 2009
- Location: Southend-on-Sea, Essex, England
-
-
AntB Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1194
- Joined: November 20, 2010
- Location: Behind the Evil Monkey in your closet.
@Dekes
I try and avoid tunneling where possible, and I have considered moose as town and given him the benefit of doubt which he quickly blew to bits.
Beefster seems a bit fishy at the moment, nothing viscous enough to warrant my vote (for now), however, I can see what the bandwagon is getting at.
boberz seems to be a little bit of everywhere at the moment, but I have little more than a null on him for now.
Hiraki also seems a bit fishy at the moment, nothing really more than gut though.-
-
Mariyta Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4312
- Joined: May 7, 2006
- Location: NY
When someone is L-2, quick lynch is always possible, and I don't like putting someone that close to lynch that early in the game. We would lose a lot of information to end the game that quickly.brokenscraps wrote:I found Mariyta's vote on boberz fairly odd. Same post she seems to want to put a vote on moose but doesn't because that would put him at l-2 (it would actually put him at l-3, but that is neither here nor there); I don't think a quick lynch was a reasonable threat here, and if you really thought he was the scummiest why wouldn't you want to vote him?
That comment had nothing to do with moose and boberz. It was about Lord Chronos and Beefster. But in regards to moose and boberz, I felt they were about equally scummy, whereas I found Lord Chronos to be clearly scummier than Beefster at the time.Later in the game you would write:
Why should you vote for someone you consider the lesser scum just because they don't have a wagon? Trying to get votes on somebody else would only distract from moose. The overreacting charge seems a very weak reason for voting for boberz here.Mariyta wrote:Why should I vote the person I feel is the lesser scum just because he has the wagon?
Beefster's reasons seemed to be [poorly] parroting mine, IMO. Yes, my initial reason for voting boberz was weak. It was page 2.So I found this vote odd straight away, and it really set alarm bells off when beefster, with his first actual game post, voted for boberz with almost the exact same reason (switching from overreacting to Hiraki to overdefensive to Hiraki). Of course it seems odd that scum would play together like this, but there doesn't seem to be any intention from beefsters of creating a connection between him and Mariyta shown in the post, just a mutual attempt to start a boberz bandwagon for fairly weak (and similar) reasons.
When someone says one thing pretty scummy, that doesn't mean they're scum. Boberz' play for the most part has been decent. I think my case on Lord Chronos was good enough to warrant a vote. And continually trying to link beefster with me is just poor play. First, w/o flips, linking two people is practically useless. Second, the "links" you are making are weak, at best. There is no connection between us, aside from the fact that I listed him as second on a scum list where your predecessor came first. This attempt to link pre-flip seems to be a plague on MS lately.Millions long for immortality who don't know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon.
-Susan Ertz
Whoever thinks grammar is not important, think again. Capitalization is the difference between helping your Uncle Jack off a horse and helping your uncle jack off a horse.-
-
Nobody Special Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14479
- Joined: January 6, 2010
- Location: Not here
Votecount 1.08
Beefster - 4 - brokenscraps, Ant_to_the_max, Mariyta, Dekes
moose200x - 3 - Hiraki, Substrike22, AntB
Ant_to_the_max - 1 - Mr Wright
brokenscraps - 1 - Beefster
Hiraki - 1 - boberz
Substrike22 - 1 - Lateralus22
Not Voting: moose200x
With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.
Deadline: December 28
V/LA: Substrike22, through Sunday (....if I can count to four properly)
-
-
Beefster Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2117
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Colorado
Nice WIFOM.brokenscraps wrote:Beefster wrote:There's no need for him to claim at this point. He's softclaimed a power role and that's enough. I just want him to stop his "I hate having a power role" crap. If he hates it so bad, why doesn't he replace out instead of screwing with the game?
I'm just going to really hope moose isn't a vanilla townie making a fakeclaim or that he isn't exaggerating his PR's significance, as I read in this thread that he showed regret for doing this in another game.Beefster wrote:This reads to me as buddying. Also, why do you care so much that he claims? You don't think he's scummy; there is no good reason for him to claim.
If he is really a town power role the scum already know that he isn't a scum player, that he is the only claimed power role and that his power role is apparently very useful to the town. The exact details of his power aren't too important, already they know he would be a good target for killing off.
If he is scum making a fakeclaim, however, then we are losing a lot of potentially useful information that denies us the opportunity to scrutinize and test his claims. Being able to just claim PR makes it too easy for scum.
So if he is town we won't lose anything from a full claim, and if he is scum his claim will be much easier to check, so I think that now that a soft claim has been made there is good reason for a full one.
If he has a powerrole, like he's softclaimed, it would be worse. He'll just get nightkilled.
It does look like that. It was a rhetorical question I used to emphasize cutting the crap.brokenscraps wrote:You've changed your mind very quickly as well:
Right here you seem to call for more claiming from moose. Whatever opinions suits the lynch you're looking for, eh?Beefster wrote:
Cut the crap. What are you hiding?moose200x wrote:Just let me do my thing for one night and if I am alive you lynch me fast. No argument from me.
Your argument looks awfully inconclusive. How 'bout a one word answer? (anti-town?, scummy?, neutral?)brokenscraps wrote:
Fair enough. It comes off to me much more as always playing that way both judging from a quick glance at his previous games and the general read I get of his motivations this game, so more as anti-town than scummy. Now using previous bad play to justify current bad play creates a general site meta of encouraging bad play, so I don't think it's good to use this to clear him, and if boberz and anyone else in favor of a Hiraki lynch can provide a stronger case (mainly who do you think his scum partners are?) then I would be paying much more attention.Beefster wrote:This looks like an excuse to fencesit for a while. What doyouthink?
I'm not seeing how this proves your argument.brokenscraps wrote:
While reading the thread it seemed like there was some time of connection between you and Mariyta, I would see this as a possible scum team.beefster wrote:Are there any other accusations you'd like to bring to the table?
I found Mariyta's vote on boberz fairly odd. Same post she seems to want to put a vote on moose but doesn't because that would put him at l-2 (it would actually put him at l-3, but that is neither here nor there); I don't think a quick lynch was a reasonable threat here, and if you really thought he was the scummiest why wouldn't you want to vote him? Later in the game you would write:
Why should you vote for someone you consider the lesser scum just because they don't have a wagon? Trying to get votes on somebody else would only distract from moose. The overreacting charge seems a very weak reason for voting for boberz here.Mariyta wrote:Why should I vote the person I feel is the lesser scum just because he has the wagon?
-You asked for an unnecessary full claim.brokenscraps wrote:@beefster: mind outlining the case against me?
-Possible buddying with moose, which is strange considering you want him to claim.
-fence sitting
-WIFOMOn hiatus indefinitely. This was a nice distraction when I was working through my faith transition out of Mormonism, but I need to move on to bigger and better things now.
Get to know a meat boy-
-
Beefster Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2117
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Colorado
I said "What are you hiding?" not "CLAIM PLZ". It was a rhetorical question.Dekes wrote:Unvote; Vote: Beefster
Yep, I know I said Beefster was town. But that was based on the fact that Substrike (one of my suspect) had Lord Chronos (my other suspect), Beefster and moose as suspects and yet decided to avoid the Beefster wagon (where LC was on) and LC and instead went moose - me - moose. But now that brokenscraps has somehwat redeemed LC, it seems that LC was rather disinterested in the game than scummily lurking. So that voids my theory of Substrike avoiding a wagon where his partner is on if brokenscraps is town.
Beefster's discrepancy between saying "moose has to fullclaim now" and "there's no point for moose to claim" within two posts is just too hard to overlook. I'll look into Beefster later for more, but the vote seems good for now.
Absolutely nothing. Chances are the mafia will kill him anyway.Dekes wrote:Also, I'm sick at looking at the moose wagon. Too bad a Substrike wagon wouldn't liff off. With the only person softclaiming moose has painted a bull's eye on his back anyway, and even if not, dude said, he could prove himself tomorrow. So what exactly is there to gain if we lynch him today?On hiatus indefinitely. This was a nice distraction when I was working through my faith transition out of Mormonism, but I need to move on to bigger and better things now.
Get to know a meat boy-
-
Beefster Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2117
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Colorado
Also @Dekes, your reason behind voting me is kinda convoluted. Care to use logic?On hiatus indefinitely. This was a nice distraction when I was working through my faith transition out of Mormonism, but I need to move on to bigger and better things now.
Get to know a meat boy-
-
Lateralus22 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1715
- Joined: June 12, 2010
-
-
Beefster Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2117
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Colorado
Isn't that kind of the idea? The mafia will do the action worst for the town, because it's best for them. It's just how they roll.Lateralus22 wrote:Gotta catch up later, on skim two things. Why does Beefster assume scum will automatically nk moose? A similar situation has happened before personally and it was devastating for the town.
So he's lurking. Big deal. It's Christmas time. I wouldn't be surprised if everyone got prodded by New Year.Lateralus22 wrote:Moose is not playing to his to his town meta, he has done NOTHING this whole game.On hiatus indefinitely. This was a nice distraction when I was working through my faith transition out of Mormonism, but I need to move on to bigger and better things now.
Get to know a meat boy-
-
Ant_to_the_max Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 871
- Joined: May 7, 2010
WIFOM_to_the_max right there >_>Beefster wrote:
Isn't that kind of the idea? The mafia will do the action worst for the town, because it's best for them. It's just how they roll.Lateralus22 wrote:Gotta catch up later, on skim two things. Why does Beefster assume scum will automatically nk moose? A similar situation has happened before personally and it was devastating for the town.
Just got home from work so I just skimmed things for now and just wanted to say that right nowApologies for falling off the face of the earth.
I'M BACK BABY FOR A LIMITED TIME*!-
-
Nobody Special Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14479
- Joined: January 6, 2010
- Location: Not here
Searching for a replacement for Hiraki, per his request.-
-
Mariyta Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4312
- Joined: May 7, 2006
- Location: NY
/agreeAnt_to_the_max wrote:
WIFOM_to_the_max right there >_>Beefster wrote:
Isn't that kind of the idea? The mafia will do the action worst for the town, because it's best for them. It's just how they roll.Lateralus22 wrote:Gotta catch up later, on skim two things. Why does Beefster assume scum will automatically nk moose? A similar situation has happened before personally and it was devastating for the town.
Just got home from work so I just skimmed things for now and just wanted to say that right now
And the whole "It's Christmas. Of course he's lurking" is lame. Christmas isn't for another week.Millions long for immortality who don't know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon.
-Susan Ertz
Whoever thinks grammar is not important, think again. Capitalization is the difference between helping your Uncle Jack off a horse and helping your uncle jack off a horse.-
-
brokenscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 776
- Joined: December 1, 2007
Anti-town, but if there was a stronger case on Hiraki it would be a sign of scumminess. If, for example, his replacement act in an anti-town that would definitely be worth looking into.Beefster wrote:Your argument looks awfully inconclusive. How 'bout a one word answer? (anti-town?, scummy?, neutral?)-
-
Beefster Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2117
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Colorado
@broken: Thanks for being concise. I really hate it when people dance around the question. I prefer the format <Answer>- <Reason>.
Lurking isn't bad on its own. It's only when you lurk for 3 days, post some fluff, then lurk some more. That's bad. But lurklurklurkCONTENTlurklurklurk is okay. Obviously not preferable, but rarely deserving of a vote.
@Mariyta: some people are REALLY busy even a week before Christmas. How isn't that a legitimate excuse to lurk? (I'm using 'excuse' a bit loosely here)On hiatus indefinitely. This was a nice distraction when I was working through my faith transition out of Mormonism, but I need to move on to bigger and better things now.
Get to know a meat boy-
-
Nobody Special Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14479
- Joined: January 6, 2010
- Location: Not here
werewolf555 replaces Hiraki effective immediately!
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
-