Saint 292 wrote:I'd like to see a list of people you find scummy.
diddin would probably top the list at the moment, followed closely by Helghast. If I had to pick a couple more, EC and Longing both seem a little off. I'm not really prepared to make a case on either of these guys, but I could join either of these wagons.
---
AntB 293 wrote:Just going with the flavour, but I'll vote "normal" if its going to bug people that much.
Well, I don't want this to sound rolefishing-ish, but I was kind of curious if you had to vote using IDs or if you were just doing it for fun. If you are just doing it for fun, do you mind putting the name next to the ID as a personal favor to me?
---
pops 299 wrote:I get the feeling you're one of those fellows that extensively uses the preview button with every alignment, making every alignment hard to read.
I do that more to keep my spelling and grammar in check (usually unsuccessfully), but, to respond to your previous comment without being cute, I'm just analyzing the situation as best I can. I hope you'll find, as the game progresses, that I end up seeming more town to you than not (or, better still, more town than unreadable).
---
implosion 302 wrote:Unreadability is okay when you're town? I'll have to remember that next time I'm scum
.
Well, I don't know. I honestly don't try to be unreadable. I try to act as unemotional as possible when playing, regardless of alignment. pops and I have played together a few times though, and he's brought this issue up before.
In either case, I wouldn't necessarily take a page from my book, implosion. I don't have a very impressive record.
---
AntB 308 wrote:Did you read why I voted for Narsis?
He bandwagon-voted EC without a single mention of EC in any of his posts. Hardly gut feeling. In fact, he did pretty much the same as Saint has done to me but actually placed his vote.
I just looked back at this, and AntB is right. diddin kind of inflated his attack against AntB for no real reason. This is something anyone could easily go back and check on.
---
pops 318 wrote:Red, are you going to stand by a statement that Helghast is as anti-town as it gets? There have been numerous other players with many more posts, many chances to say anti-town things that don't rub you right. Is the 60 second iso really as evil as it gets for you?
A couple of things. First, I would not classify Helghast as "anti-town as it gets". That's needlessly exaggerating my case. I don't think he's acting particularly townie, but I'm not about to inflate this to some sort of obvious choice. Second, and partially because of what I just said, I'm willing to admit he's on the lurker side of the spectrum. I don't think that makes any of my points any less valid though. Just because he has less activity doesn't mean that he shouldn't have casted a vote. It certainly doesn't make his approach to Parama any better in my eyes either. It should also be noted that there are a good 5 or 6 players with less posts than Helghast here, but I'm not trying to hide the fact that Helghast has less activity. I think if he had double the activity in the same vein of what he's already shown us, I'd still be on his case.
---
Lateralus 327 wrote:Hello RC, could you give me your top three as well? Also do you feel as strongly about didden scum as you did earlier?
Hey, Lateralus. I'm glad I get to play with you.
Top three would probably be diddin, Helghast, and either EC or you, unfortunately, at third. Yes, I do feel as strongly about diddin scum. Nothing he's really said has changed my perspective of him so far. If he takes care to use his power wisely, then I think that may buy him some creditability, but we'll see what else happens in the mean time.