This is a relational observation. It’s something I look for in a Mafia game. Don’t really care if it is meaningless to you. As I said, you were so blatant in your /barning of Pops that you are very unlikely to be scum of the same faction (if we have multiples as Pops has suggested). Are you suggesting you would be dumb enough to buddy a scum-partner so blantantly?Chkflip wrote:The "It's not possible because that'd be too obvious" excuse for it not to be scummy? That's as assenine as me saying you just bussed your scumbuddy Pops to paint me scummy if he were to flip. If you find it to be blatant buddying, call it out; otherwise, just pointing it out like this is pretty meaningless to me. Not to mention the fact that it looks like fakehunting.
And use of fake-hutning 1.
So mindlessly jumping on the wagon is your standard of voting? Gotcha, more on this later in your comments.Chkflip wrote:No, actually, that's called pressure. On top of a meek point -- is your scumdar supposed to make me crack under the pressure of your fakehunting? Stop acting like you're above the game and maybe I'll take you seriously, guy.
Also, please elaborate on why you felt the need to make a disconnected personal attack. I’d like to know how I’m ‘acting above the game’ by suspecting you.
Fake-hunting use number 2 in said post noted.
Um what? Why post a dismissive statement about the Longing if you didn’t have a scum-hunting motive?Chkflp wrote:No, it's not. Congratulations. Note that I wasn't scumhunting in that particular portion, though, as there was still much interest in the Tree Stump ability and exactly how it worked.
Really … how is the following portion of that post not exactly as I described.Chkflp wrote:This seems to be your only point of half-validity. I've got to ask, though... if you had so much of a firm belief that it was as you say, why not supply the hard copy?
And here's why. Obviously we were still discussing the Stump. The rest of this particular post is answering a question Lateralus had posed to anyone who wished to respond, then me finishing with an inquiry in response. Is this the greatest post in the history of mafia? Certainly not, but this is a very poor example of you trying to pair me with something that might actually be scummy in Narsis.
You specifically say Helghast is scummy but you can’t actually show why. Regardless of who you were talking to you just did exactly what Narsis did.Helghast, on the other hand, just seems scummy. But I can't pinpoint anything scummy (that hasn't already been addressed) and I hate parrots, so I've yet to give my full read on that situation and I will continue to play it by ear
I’m straw-manning? How so? Did you not unvote and specifically say two other people were scummy in the same post without revoting? Seems pretty inconsistent that you were so careful with your vote here but easily bandwagonned someone (Wrathchild) that you had expressed zero suspicion of before hoping on the wagon following Parama’s lead for ‘pressure’. Why didn’t you ‘pressure’ either of your scum candidates? You can’t have your cake and eat it too.Chkflp wrote:Obviously you're strawmanning and now tunneling so hard on me with your fakehunting fakepressure that you fail to read the post correctly.
- Finding someone to act in a scummy manner isn't enough to vote them as you may just be misinterpreting what's being said, nor was Parama's oversight enough to vote for him either. So yes, dodging a question gets a FoS and not a vote. Personally, now I can see where he's coming from.
How can I possibly be tunnelling? Do you, who lives by the Wiki, not know that tunnelling involves only looking at one person AT THE EXPENSE OF ALL OTHERS? You can hardly claim that is the case here.
Honestly the whole first sentence looks like Wiki-buzzword-bingo. Do you think that throwing Wiki-fallacies around when they are not even relavant makes your defense stronger?
3rd specific notice of the use of fake-hunting. Appeal to repetition (which, again, you should know from your Bible) much?
But you've earned my vote with your over-the-top reaction combined with the scummy behavior I've already demonstrated.
VOTE: chkflp
Remember, don't crack under the pressure ... again.