Star Wars Quote Mafia- Game over

[Fritzler]

2. Dranko is lying scum, and clinically insane, and trying to get the vig lynched when he could night kill him.

i think its a better move to lynch him now then you wont have to worry aobut him killing you at night, and you have your night free to kill someone else.

sure you may get lynched they following day. but hes taking one for the team.

Yea, but if SOS is just going to come out like that, he could just as easily NK him with the doc dead. And that way he would go with the greater chance that none of them would get vigged.

[Quailman]

Dranko is lying scum, and clinically insane, and trying to get the vig lynched when he could night kill him.

Didn't Dranko say it was all a one-time deal? He can't investigate or vig-kill any more.

[Fritzler]

Dranko is lying scum, and clinically insane, and trying to get the vig lynched when he could night kill him.

Didn't Dranko say it was all a one-time deal? He can't investigate or vig-kill any more.

Right, I"m saying if Dranko is scum, there's no reason for him to do this, cuz he could NK SOS with his mafia kill.

[RangeroftheNorth]

So even if Dranko was telling the truth, we have no way for him to verify his role. I can guarantee, however, that quailman was not responsible for last nights kill.

[Fritzler]

Um, so you're claiming tracker?

Thanks a lot.

[Quailman]

What? Everyone either investigated or blocked me last night?

[Fritzler]

I full role copped you last night, yea.

[/sarcasm if you couldn't tell, seriously, no one else needs to come out]

[rajrhcpfreak]

What? Everyone either investigated or blocked me last night?

no

[Dranko20]

Quailman was responisble for the kill?

Ranger, You better claim. You

do

know that there were two kills last night right?

I have SOS and Ranger peged as scum right now, I think Ranger ment to lie for SOS, and said Quailman instead.

And yeah, its a one-shot thing. Im a vanilla now, if you wish to lynch me now be my guest, i have my information out, its all that matters.

[Fritzler]

Quailman was responisble for the kill?

Ranger, You better claim. You

do

know that there were two kills last night right?

I have SOS and Ranger peged as scum right now, I think Ranger ment to lie for SOS, and said Quailman instead.

And yeah, its a one-shot thing. Im a vanilla now, if you wish to lynch me now be my guest, i have my information out, its all that matters.

No, he said Quailman wasn't responsible for the kill. We'll see what to do about ranger tomorrow.

[BabyJesus]

unvote, vote SOS

[RangeroftheNorth]

Quailman was responisble for the kill?

Did you actually read my post? Did you notice the

not

in my post that is somehow miraculously missing in your interpretation?

Ranger, You better claim. You

do

know that there were two kills last night right?

Yes, I know their were two kills. Since one of the kills was being claimed by two separate claimed vigilantes I assumed that everyone would know I was talking about the second, but if you insist, I can guarantee that quailman was not responsible for either of the kills. I am going to go ahead and spell this out. I am a role blocker. Last night I blocked quailman. Quailman is not responisble for either of last nights two kills. If you'll notice, my information corresponds rather nicely with yours. If quailman is innocent, he couldn't have been responsible for the second kill.

I have SOS and Ranger peged as scum right now, I think Ranger ment to lie for SOS, and said Quailman instead.

Quite frankly, you are wrong. I am not scum, and I said exactly what I meant to. If you had actually read my post, I think you would realize that this does not even make any sense. I do not intend to make any attempt to defend SOS, although, of the two claimed vigs, I think you are by far the more suspicious.

[BabyJesus]

actually

unvote

this is stupid. If we have claimed vigs, we let them shoot each other tonight and see what happens.

[Fritzler]

actually

unvote

this is stupid. If we have claimed vigs, we let them shoot each other tonight and see what happens.

Except dranko said his was one shot.

[BabyJesus]

actually

unvote

this is stupid. If we have claimed vigs, we let them shoot each other tonight and see what happens.

Except dranko said his was one shot.

Ahh....

So we make Coron prove he is a vig by shooting Dranko tonight. If he fails, we lynch him.

[BabyJesus]

actually

unvote

this is stupid. If we have claimed vigs, we let them shoot each other tonight and see what happens.

Except dranko said his was one shot.

Ahh....

So we make Coron prove he is a vig by shooting Dranko tonight. If he fails, we lynch him.

And by Coron I of course mean SOS.

[Fritzler]

actually

unvote

this is stupid. If we have claimed vigs, we let them shoot each other tonight and see what happens.

Except dranko said his was one shot.

Ahh....

So we make Coron prove he is a vig by shooting Dranko tonight. If he fails, we lynch him.

No it'd be we have coron/SOS shoot each other and lynch dranko.

[BabyJesus]

Now I'm confused... we have SOS claiming vig, and Dranko claiming one shot do-it-all.

What is coron again?

[Fritzler]

Coron's not in this game.

[rajrhcpfreak]

who cares, lets lynch coron anyways...

[BabyJesus]

Coron's not in this game.

this is where looking at page one would have been helpful.

OK, so SOS must shoot Dranko tonight. If he fails, we lynch him. And RangeroftheNorth can track him to confirm it was him...

[Fritzler]

No ranger = roleblocker.

[BabyJesus]

No ranger = roleblocker.

goddamn it

[Fritzler]

I say lynch SOS, it seems much more likely he's lying then dranko right now.

[BabyJesus]

I say lynch SOS, it seems much more likely he's lying then dranko right now.

why not let him prove his claim though? Wo says we can't have 2 vigs. Shouldn't be that tough.