Mod 1680 wrote:
curiouskarmadog (1) -StrangerCoug
Mod
Mod 1680 wrote:
curiouskarmadog (1) -StrangerCoug
I don't need a defence because basing an entire case on associative tells before either player's alignment is known is, well, desperate is what comes to mind - for all that even I agree that TMH is most likely scum.I Am Innocent wrote:Is this your defense?q21 wrote:So. IAI, I've debunked one entirely associative case on me (which was first mentioned by you) so you're bringing another?
How about starting with who do you think TMH's scum partners are, assuming he is scum of course?
RedCoyote wrote:Mod 1680 wrote:
curiouskarmadog (1) -StrangerCoug, is this an error or is this vote valid?
Mod
To the best of my knowledge that is correct. Format of VoteCount is Votee (Number of Votes) - Voter(s) .
Implosion can verify this, but I believe that the role prohibits the player 1) from being lynched and 2) from voting. A vote on the TreeStump player seems valid, and the fact that Implosion verified that he passed it to CKD and CKD admitted he received it makes me think the answer to your question is yes (and that the vote is valid).RedCoyote wrote:ckd, do you or do you not have the Tree Stump ability?
Can't find it yet, but notice in his #46 in iso how he is coaching quadz, then he lays down an RVS style vote on him ....RedCoyote wrote:Unvote;vote: quadz
Also, from the same post, notice his buddying tone with Q21?RedCoyote wrote:The obvious solution, q, is to rid ourselves of theman right now. Listen, even those that don't support lynching him admit that we'll probably lose the dayvig ability. I have seen nothing but whispers that imply that the Virus or the dayvig abilities are coming back, so I have no real reason to believe they will again.
Notice him defending quadz here from an associative tell, thus making one with him himself?RedCoyote wrote:Huh? Maybe you have more information on Parama, but I don't. Parama's ability in no way confirms him as any alignment as far as I'm concerned, so I don't see how you can validly use this against quadz.diddin 108 wrote:Early scummy vibes from him on that terrible "scumslip" catch, not to mention one on a claimed fairly powerful PR.
Perhaps this is the post I remember? It's not worded how I remember, though.Nero Cain wrote:We have a week till deadline. I support the Quadz, Wrath and to an extent the TMH wagons. Implosion, I AM, Bunny and Q21 need to switch their votes to one of those 3. DGB needs to vote.
Personally I like the Quadz lynch and I'd like to see him flip today.
I FOUND ITI Am Innocent wrote:That was what I was doing with my vote on Bunnylover. But that wagon emptied except for me.Saint wrote:*IAI - Why not vote quadz? Regardless of what you think of tmh's alignment, wouldn't you rather lynch someone who has been scummy on his own than based on tenuous connections?
Everyone outside of you and Pops seems to think TMH is scum. There has to be a fair amount of town in that group that believe that way. It got me to thinking, if we are right, and I am fairly confident that we are, who could be his partners? Who does not seem to be on his scumteam? Well I told the group who I thought is or might be on his scumteam. I do not think Diddin, WC, nor your slot is (and know that I am not) based on the conversations TMH put forward. Everyone else is still up in the air.
With that said, I would like to see a q21 wagon get going. If that does not, at least I got this concern on record for when TMH does flip.
PS - Quadz I have been going back and forth on today. Based on the TMH connections (doubting WC is his teammate), I would actually push for quadz over WC at the deadline now. (Hint to Quadz, hop on the q21 bandwagon.)
PPS - "We're going to need" that tomorrow. Not Town is going to need it, we are. Message sent....and now read loud and clear by this poster.
And Diddin can die tomorrow. IOW, lay off Diddin for now, I need his dayvig and then we can attack his "easy target" slot tomorrow.
I'm sure about this one. Two scum. Bank on it.
This sounds like scumcoaching to meI Am Innocent wrote:Consider thisFOS Quadzas an L-1 vote. Next FOS/Vote should call for a claim.
I am thinking at this point if there is a claim, that quadz should not say what the ability is. The person who passed the role could verify that the claim does exist. At this point we go with further discussion as needed.
AGREED. That's the sort of scumtell I love.Saint wrote:This sounds like scumcoaching to meI Am Innocent wrote:Consider thisFOS Quadzas an L-1 vote. Next FOS/Vote should call for a claim.
I am thinking at this point if there is a claim, that quadz should not say what the ability is. The person who passed the role could verify that the claim does exist. At this point we go with further discussion as needed.
check the one where he tells quadz where to vote at the end of my wallDrippingGoofball wrote:AGREED. That's the sort of scumtell I love.Saint wrote:This sounds like scumcoaching to meI Am Innocent wrote:Consider thisFOS Quadzas an L-1 vote. Next FOS/Vote should call for a claim.
I am thinking at this point if there is a claim, that quadz should not say what the ability is. The person who passed the role could verify that the claim does exist. At this point we go with further discussion as needed.