SitMOA II - [Endgame] The end...

CryMeARiver · Post Post #500 (ISO) » Fri Jan 28, 2011 5:00 pm

malthusis wrote:
CryMeARiver wrote:
gandalf5166 wrote:RBT DID YOU SERIOUSLY KNOW THAT THIS WAS GOING TO HAPPEN AND YOU DIDNT FUCKING WARN ME?

THE SCROLL TOOK AWAY MY GODDAMN VOTE
You're shittin me?!?!? Like just for today or for good? We gotta analyze anyone who unaturally avoided the scroll - I thought it might give a power or protection or HP or something
The irony is killing me after I wanted the scroll so badly and 3 people took it before me

Ha same here! I still say Tasky hangs. Looking back it seems like he could have picked it up just to seem town later on when we found out it did something bad since his reasoning for actually picking it up seemed forced.

gandalf5166 · Post Post #501 (ISO) » Fri Jan 28, 2011 5:18 pm

IT DOESNT SAY HOW LONG IT LASTS, AND ITS KILLING ME

Now that I think about it, he phrases it weird. Apparently it's a post restriction, and the terms are "posting without voting". It seems like if taking away my vote was what he really meant, then he would have just said "Your vote is gone".

CryMeARiver · Post Post #502 (ISO) » Fri Jan 28, 2011 5:21 pm

gandalf5166 wrote:IT DOESNT SAY HOW LONG IT LASTS, AND ITS KILLING ME

Now that I think about it, he phrases it weird. Apparently it's a post restriction, and the terms are "posting without voting". It seems like if taking away my vote was what he really meant, then he would have just said "Your vote is gone".

So your vote for today is stuck or could you unvote if you wanted to?

gandalf5166 · Post Post #503 (ISO) » Fri Jan 28, 2011 6:04 pm

I don't know. I just told you everything. He just said basically: You have a post restriction: posting without voting. I guess I should ask him what that means.

Bunnylover · Post Post #504 (ISO) » Fri Jan 28, 2011 6:25 pm

gandalf5166 wrote:I don't know. I just told you everything. He just said basically: You have a post restriction: posting without voting. I guess I should ask him what that means.

It means you have a vote.
But can't use it.

Katy · Post Post #505 (ISO) » Fri Jan 28, 2011 8:22 pm

gandalf5166 wrote:Not voting for Katsuki isn't even the main problem with you, Katy.

Care to tell me what is, then?

Riceballtail · Post Post #506 (ISO) » Fri Jan 28, 2011 8:39 pm

gandalf5166 wrote:RBT DID YOU SERIOUSLY KNOW THAT THIS WAS GOING TO HAPPEN AND YOU DIDNT FUCKING WARN ME?

THE SCROLL TOOK AWAY MY GODDAMN VOTE

Did you want me to give away it was a bad scroll?

Also, no, I didn't realize that it was the bad scroll. Beef was a scroll writer, and so I knew he had made both protective spell ones as well as probably some negative ones.

Tasky · Post Post #507 (ISO) » Sat Jan 29, 2011 12:37 am

unvote, vote malthusis

thanks for claiming scum.

gandalf5166 · Post Post #508 (ISO) » Sat Jan 29, 2011 3:54 am

Tasky wrote:
unvote, vote malthusis

thanks for claiming scum.

RBT just told everyone that scum didn't know what it was.

Nice try though.

I have been informed that the scroll did exactly what I thought it did: I can't vote anymore. Now, I don't know whether that means that my vote is stuck where it is or what. We'll just have to wait for a VC.

Tasky · Post Post #509 (ISO) » Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:49 am

gandalf5166 wrote:
Tasky wrote:
unvote, vote malthusis

thanks for claiming scum.
RBT just told everyone that scum didn't know what it was. Nice try though.

?

SnakePlissken · Post Post #510 (ISO) » Sat Jan 29, 2011 9:42 am

So do you want me to hammer now and see if your vote does still work?

gandalf5166 · Post Post #511 (ISO) » Sat Jan 29, 2011 9:45 am

SnakePlissken wrote:So do you want me to hammer now and see if your vote does still work?

Doesn't really matter ether way. If you think he's scum, hammer. I'm not going to give you a way to back out if Tasky flips town.

SnakePlissken · Post Post #512 (ISO) » Sat Jan 29, 2011 9:59 am

That's not quite what I meant. I have no problem going into the hammer, just wanted to know if everyone has got all they wanted from this day phase and if we want to wrap it up now (if your vote still works?)

gandalf5166 · Post Post #513 (ISO) » Sat Jan 29, 2011 10:01 am

I'm done with today. I WILL BE TARGETING KATY. ANYBODY WHO WANTS TO HELP, FEEL WELCOME

SnakePlissken · Post Post #514 (ISO) » Sat Jan 29, 2011 10:05 am

Vote Tasky

Here we go then.

gandalf5166 · Post Post #515 (ISO) » Sat Jan 29, 2011 10:07 am

SnakePlissken wrote:
Vote Tasky

Here we go then.

I....... would have waited for some more input. It'll work out though.

SnakePlissken · Post Post #516 (ISO) » Sat Jan 29, 2011 10:10 am

Well everyone likes your lead followed and I'm not going to be on much longer and I won't be on much if at all tomorrow.

Tasky · Post Post #517 (ISO) » Sat Jan 29, 2011 1:49 pm

claim: one-shot-cop
investigated Snake N3. result: innocent

Tasky · Post Post #518 (ISO) » Sat Jan 29, 2011 1:58 pm

at this point I hope gandalf's vote doesn't count anymore. and I hope those of you who are still on my wagon unvote now and hope the same.
and please let's lynch malthusis.

and no, I am not going into any more detail on my role, since the mod warned explicitly about claiming too much of the role PM. all you need to know is that what my role adds up to in the end is a one-shot alignment-investigation.

gandalf5166 · Post Post #519 (ISO) » Sat Jan 29, 2011 3:14 pm

Okay, if you flip town, we'll take that into consideration. Are you confirmed sane/would sense any scumteam?

Tasky · Post Post #520 (ISO) » Sat Jan 29, 2011 3:31 pm

gandalf5166 wrote:Okay, if you flip town, we'll take that into consideration. Are you confirmed sane/would sense any scumteam?

I was explicitly told that Snake is allied with the Wizards. My role PM and my night result didn't mention a possible sanity issue, so I assume I am sane

gandalf5166 · Post Post #521 (ISO) » Sat Jan 29, 2011 3:44 pm

Tasky wrote:
gandalf5166 wrote:Okay, if you flip town, we'll take that into consideration. Are you confirmed sane/would sense any scumteam?
I was explicitly told that Snake is allied with the Wizards. My role PM and my night result didn't mention a possible sanity issue, so I assume I am sane

Okay. I'm not gonna assume you're town just cause of this though.

Bunnylover · Post Post #522 (ISO) » Sat Jan 29, 2011 3:54 pm

Frankly I will say still go with the lynch.

If your lynch we know rather or not to trust your read on Snake who will join Gandalf on the confirm side.
If we do not lynch you, we do not know if you are lieing with your scum partner Snake and just saved both of ya'll.

Because you are one-shot, I would still say go with the lynch, but this is my personal opinion.

gandalf5166 · Post Post #523 (ISO) » Sat Jan 29, 2011 3:55 pm

Especially since he's one-shot.

CryMeARiver · Post Post #524 (ISO) » Sat Jan 29, 2011 4:12 pm

Bunnylover wrote:Frankly I will say still go with the lynch.

If your lynch we know rather or not to trust your read on Snake who will join Gandalf on the confirm side.
If we do not lynch you, we do not know if you are lieing with your scum partner Snake and just saved both of ya'll.

Because you are one-shot, I would still say go with the lynch, but this is my personal opinion.

Oooo I hate everything about this post.
1) You still think he's scum? If not, then it's scummy to say "still go with the lynch".
2) Snake is not clear. Godfather or investigation immune is a very possible role among scum, especially yellow since (if Kat WAS telling the truth) there is only 2 of them (according to RBT's 6 antitown)