So, obvious reads are obvious because they're obvious.3. Because they're ridiculously obvious.
Obviously.
What, you mean the question of asking me to repeat what I had just said about Saint? 'Cause I've already said what I think of Saint in the posts where I talk about Saint. Additionally, the questions I have asked you would in fact qualify as scumhunting, whilst your "You are scummy because it is obvious" would most definitely not. Also, nobody is voting for you.Empking wrote:1. Because I've just replaced in.DarthYoshi wrote:Empking--why is it important to inform everyone of all your reads, as opposed to, say, just your scumreads? And, why gut when you have over 250 posts of material to analyze? And, why are your definitive reads definitive to you?
2. In depth analysis is just a way to feel confident in your fallacy filled reads.
3. Because they're ridiculously obvious.
FOS: King- Ignoring my question, jumping on the Empking wagon rather than scumhunting, "Empking should have noticed the like 10 posts of people saying not to post the list of scum stuff and then not done what he did." which is just so filled with scumminess I'm not sure where to begin.
And if his defense is adequate, I'll change reads again.Prior to now, you said implosion's defence was decent. But this time you didn't even give him a chance to respond before deciding you'd changed your read.
But when ICE laid it out like that... O.oICEninja's post before yours didn't actually make any new arguments either; I brought up the discrepancy between implosion's initial scummy / currently neutral reads, the lack of justification for his 'scum on wagon' stance and whatever else pages ago. Maybe my posts weren't convincing enough, but that "pretty huge" contradiction wasn't new.
Well others seem to have defended me on this, and I don't have anything to add to what they have said.mb says something similar to "why does such and such make me scum?" the fact that he has to ask why seems and reads more like "what did I do wrong for you to have caught me?" than anything else.
This is terrible. You just essentially said "I feel like you are all just pushing the scummiest looking player", and had an undertone that it is scummy to do so.Saint wrote: I don't see how my catchup was scummy or fluffy.
I feel like you all are just pushing an easy wagon.
As stated before, my 9000 vote was mainly an attempt to get content, but now I do in fact find Saint scummy, and my vote isn't there to pressure into content.A quick scan of his ISO shows that on his 5th, he voted for over9000, and never moved his vote from the slot. I agree that the slot is scummy, but I'm not seeing much from you about any other player slots.
The constant replacements don't help, that's for sure.mb wrote: As for other player slots.... I'm having difficulty getting any reads. Most of you are null. Implosion is leaning scum now (at least until I hear his defense). Some slight town reads too, but you all are a tough bunch to read...
LOL IM VOTING HIM TO BE LYNCHEDICEninja wrote:Oh and I want to add one thing.This is terrible. You just essentially said "I feel like you are all just pushing the scummiest looking player", and had an undertone that it is scummy to do so.Saint wrote: I don't see how my catchup was scummy or fluffy.
I feel like you all are just pushing an easy wagon.
You're easily up there with implosion as scummiest players, and while I don't like to decide scum teams without flips, I can pretty easily see a connection between you two. I'll keep it in mind if one of you flips scum.
you're keeping your vote because I know you are scum with implosionmb53 wrote:As stated before, my 9000 vote was mainly an attempt to get content, but now I do in fact find Saint scummy, and my vote isn't there to pressure into content.A quick scan of his ISO shows that on his 5th, he voted for over9000, and never moved his vote from the slot. I agree that the slot is scummy, but I'm not seeing much from you about any other player slots.
As for other player slots.... I'm having difficulty getting any reads. Most of you are null. Implosion is leaning scum now (at least until I hear his defense). Some slight town reads too, but you all are a tough bunch to read...
What? Funny how you ignore my accusation towards you in favor of trying to distance yourself from implosion. You skipped over the important part of my post and boy did that second half make you jumpy. Also:Saint wrote: LOL IM VOTING HIM TO BE LYNCHED
YOU'RE JOKING?
GO LOOK AT THE LAST VOTECOUNT
LOL
This doesn't even make sense. He is voting you because you "know" he's scum with implosion?Saint wrote: you're keeping your vote because I know you are scum with implosion
nice try to make it not appear like it's anything else, liar
Well gee this is a transparent ploy isn't it. Now who makes transparent ploys?Pfft, I read through the whole thing without looking at the last page and my biggest suspect was Neil
Thats just kinda lame.
Then he goes for a lurker vote. Gee he sure is scumhunting.KingTwelveSixteen wrote:Bluh.
Forgot to point out my suspicions of mr. fingerprint avatar for his actions this game. (_over9000)
Namely, he hasn't done any.
VOTE:_over9000
Stop your scum hunting right away!Neil does not exist. He is a figment of your imagination.
I am Neil. Neil is me. We are one.
Seriously I don't know what Neils problem was, (he was super wierd looking in his posts) but he is not here anymore. I am.
Wow being a hypocrite (He accuses 9000 of parotting) and either buddying up or supporting his scum buddy. (The post suggests the first, the fact thaty Nameless is scum suggests the latter.). Theres like 3 different scum tells there.@nameless: Wow, nice one. Theres like 3 different contradictions there.
This is him pretending to scuhunting. Do you know who pretendfeds to scumhunt? That's right! Scum.Empking should have noticed the like 10 posts of people saying not to post the list of scum stuff and then not done what he did. He also shoulda explained his vote more.
If you read the timestamps, or even the third post, it becomes incredibly obvious that those are the same post and that I merely hit the submit button to early.Empking wrote:...
Firstly, he goes through his first two posts of the game without putting on a vote. This is a deliberately anti-town action and oner I would not expect from town.
Oh, and what ploy would that be?Empking wrote:Well gee this is a transparent ploy isn't it. Now who makes transparent ploys?Pfft, I read through the whole thing without looking at the last page and my biggest suspect was Neil
Thats just kinda lame.
The reason I posted that was because it seemed likeEmpking wrote: ...Stop your scum hunting right away!Neil does not exist. He is a figment of your imagination.
I am Neil. Neil is me. We are one.
Seriously I don't know what Neils problem was, (he was super wierd looking in his posts) but he is not here anymore. I am.
I would imagine that the lurkers obvious refusal to post content whilst simultaneously claiming he had would qualify as scummy.Empking wrote:
Reading his posts, he's still attacking that lurker rather thasn doing any scumhunting. Yay!
(Why did you capitalize wagon?)Empking wrote:Wow being a hypocrite (He accuses 9000 of parotting) and either buddying up or supporting his scum buddy. (The post suggests the first, the fact thaty Nameless is scum suggests the latter.). Theres like 3 different scum tells there.@nameless: Wow, nice one. Theres like 3 different contradictions there.
And he goes back to his lurker WAGON as soon as he's worried Implosion won't be lynched.
YouEmpking wrote:This is him pretending to scuhunting. Do you know who pretendfeds to scumhunt? That's right! Scum.Empking should have noticed the like 10 posts of people saying not to post the list of scum stuff and then not done what he did. He also shoulda explained his vote more.
...I'm pretty sure Saint has a couple people other than me voting for him.Nameless wrote:Saint, I swear to God I would lynch you right now if you had a wagon. If you don't see how your catchup was scummy then you have apparently not read pretty much everything anyone has had to say about you since you replaced in.