Umbrage wrote:@ Exe: Say we go through with your plan, but someone still dies. Amrun claims she was not elected killer. Would you want to kill Amrun?
Instead of killing
Umbrage wrote:@ Exe: Say we go through with your plan, but someone still dies. Amrun claims she was not elected killer. Would you want to kill Amrun?
This is a stupid question, and similar to lining up lynches.Umbrage wrote:@ Exe: Say we go through with your plan, but someone still dies. Amrun claims she was not elected killer. Would you want to kill Amrun?
Is there any chance of an SK or vig existing in this game that could be responsible for NKs besides the execution we choose? If there is anything definitive that says our execution pick is for certain the only NK, I've missed it. It is very possible that even if amrun submits a no kill, there will be another kill from another source that should not be assumed to be amrun betraying the town or scum somehow winning the vote. (Correct me if I've missed something - have there been previous execution games where the executions are the only kills?).Tragedy wrote:Umbrage wrote:@ Exe: Say we go through with your plan, but someone still dies. Amrun claims she was not elected killer. Would you want to kill Amrun?
Instead of killingAmrunright away, we musn't actuallyElecther at all for betraying us. If it was a severe case when she's a mafia, then yes, she'd be executed the next day.
No fucking shit. That's why LINING UP LYNCHES IS SCUMMY.Umbrage wrote:You say that narrowing the kill down to two choices gives scum the ability to influence the choice between two townies, but we run that risk in normal play.
Here we go. That's all you needed to say, thanks.And what about allowing people to claim? Which person do we make claim before we execute SV?
Right. Calling your bullshit question scummy was totally acting like a childUmbrage wrote:So quit acting like a child and answer me properly next time.
If you were reading, and not trying to just push your anti-town agenda, you would know that someone already said this about a page ago.Umbrage wrote:Here we go. That's all you needed to say, thanks.And what about allowing people to claim? Which person do we make claim before we execute SV?
Exe wrote:No *EXPLETIVE* *EXPLETIVE*. That's why LINING UP LYNCHES IS SCUMMY.
We run that risk in normal play, which is WHY we don't let people get away with it.
So why the *EXPLETIVE* should we let them get away with it now?
God, you're so *EXPLETIVE* anti-town. Just stop wasting our time and let us move on with actually pro-town strategies.
Here's the simple truth: No killing at night CANNOT HURT US.
So why the *EXPLETIVE* are you so *EXPLETIVE* opposed to it?
The ONLY way you should be SO SURE that we should kill at night is if you have some magical information on who is scum. However, I've seen your scum reads, so frankly I think you're either being ignorant or you're scum trying to push your scummy agenda.
We are seriously wasting time on stupid speculation.