In terms of who we should lynch, I believe we should follow InflatablePie's logic of either me or EMPKING today.
Therefore,
He also gave a FoS of zdenek we should look into with his last post.
^ This.Swiftstrike:I don't believe we should be mass claiming at this point after all day ones are more likely wrong lynches and we lost one player at night which should basically be expected so I don't see the dire need to mass claim
Saint would you explain why you see the need for us to mass claim?
Gonna go ahead and say it--pot, meet kettle. (and as an obligatory pre-empt to the "Mb flipped town, doesn't that mean Imp will flip town too?" argument, Mb then put his vote on Implosion, who had little chance of being seen as an 'easy lynch,' so while their behavior was similar, their voting patterns weren't, and right now, that is what I am really finding demonstrably scummy about Implosion.)ImplosionLike ISOs 34-36, they're all really vapid. That trend continues through his recent posting. There's just really little new information, a lot of restating what he's already said. That's basically it.
and the fact that I called that parking your vote on a claimed Mason.Nameless wrote:
This'll be my last post before the (current) deadline. I'm leaving my vote on Empking,
You missed the point. One could easily say that saying " certain players are lurking rather than helping the town" is a scummy way to rephrase 'have IRL stuff to do'.Nameless wrote: 6 hours != lurking, obv.
Please explain this.ICE wrote: I'm still a bit worried about Empking, but if he's scum then he is guaranteed going to die before the game is over so he isn't a huge priority for me right now.
We shouldn't be looking in to implosion because Saint and implosion are scum buddies, remember? Saint was actually on the implosion wagon, pushing quite hard, but fell off that wagon once town was distracted and never looked back. Coincidence? I think not.neko wrote: Besides, why Pie's list? Why not mb's? Other than Saint, he listed implosion and swiftstrike. Why shouldn't we be looking into them? I don't have the time for it now, but I'd like to look at possible connections here.
Unless Empking gets cleared as town (by cop or mason buddy or whatever) then we're going to lynch him before lylo, plain and simple. Should he end up cleared, then he'll be a very valuable asset to town (masons are some of the strongest PRs late game, save maybe a jail keeper) and will have to be NKed anyway. If not then he's scum and we're going to lynch him. We have time.Zdenek wrote: Please explain this.
Zdenek wrote:...
and the fact that I called that parking your vote on a claimed Mason.
...
Because I defended you before for that silly argument and he ignored it. Plus I think you is town-like.Nameless wrote:KTS, why do you keep defending me?
No I said I didn't like him insinuating I was his mason partner (as he had claimed Mason), so scum slip much there.Zdenek wrote:Swift replacing in and immediately saying that he doesn't like thatEmpking was insinuating that he his is scum buddywas anti-town, and it bothers me.
--Cut--
We should. I’m rather dismayed at how much active lurking the town is tolerating from these two (including from Swift’s predecessor). And, is there a reason why you didn't vote Saint? When you posted, there wasn't a risk of putting him at L-1.Neko:Why not mb's? Other than Saint, he listed implosion and swiftstrike. Why shouldn't we be looking into them?
It's not a scum-slip. It's just that we think of players being scum-buddies more often than about them being masons, and I used the wrong word. I have no idea why I did it.SwiftStrike wrote: No I said I didn't like him insinuating I was his mason partner (as he had claimed Mason), so scum slip much there.
I don't think that Swift made a scum-slip. I think outing himself as not being a mason with Empking was anti-town because it narrowed down the field of candidates for that role.DarthYoshi wrote: @Zdenek and Swiftstrike: Could each of you explain the scumslips you saw in one another? Saying they are scumslips doesn't make them scumslips--I'm wondering if I'm missing something, and the extreme brevity isn't helping.