- Lack of scumhunting is fair, and a point against DN.Amrun wrote:This was my very first case on DN in day 1. After that, it continues to go downhill. He flat out REFUSES to refute anything, quickhammered (on scum, but quickhammers are still bad, in light of "Mafia C"), does not scumhunt, and in general is just rolling happily in anti-town play.Amrun wrote:Quick note as I'm doing further research:
DeathNote submitted a Jester role. Could Ender have received it? Is making up a role conceivable for him, in his meta? If he's jester, he's doing a good job so far (imho). Still, he could have pushed pressure when he got some votes earlier. Just throwing it out there.
DeathNote himself is giving me scumpings. Several times, he asks, "Is this scummy? Is that scummy?" in an open-ended form. It's strange to me and I honestly think he's asking for behaviors to avoid while passing it off as flippant.
The subtle insertion of "we" when he's referring to a group that suspects someone he did not suspect was something someone else pointed out and that didn't occur to me, but I might as well restate it.
Also, complete lack of scumhunting from DeathNote.
On to ISO someone else.
ThAd and some others have also brought up different, and valid, points against DN.
This is for fishythefish, who asked for a case summary, but also for DN himself since he seems to be too lazy to read.
- Refusal to defend yourself just isn't a good scumtell for me; it's not like it helps you avoid attention.
- On day 1 (and day 2) we got lynches at smaller numbers of players on a BW than declared (possibly the "Risky Super voter" explains both; certainly explains day 2. So DN wasn't quickhammering, from his point of view. Actually, it's extraordinary if DN hasn't corrected you himself here; if I were town, and accidentally hammered when I thought I was just voting, it would be a big deal, and not something I'd forget about quickly. @DN: why didn't you mention this?