Oh god... I'm sitting at my computer back from work about to read from my last post and saw this....Raivann wrote:Wouldn't benmage have been the obv. player to watch last night?
Well something to look forward to. (haventlookedwhoseclaimingwatcher)
Oh god... I'm sitting at my computer back from work about to read from my last post and saw this....Raivann wrote:Wouldn't benmage have been the obv. player to watch last night?
I never even considered targeting him.Raivann [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2864274#p2864274]#1497[/url] wrote:Wouldn't Benmage have been the obv. player to watch last night?
Feysal wrote:I never even considered targeting him.Raivann [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2864274#p2864274]#1497[/url] wrote:Wouldn't Benmage have been the obv. player to watch last night?
Last night I considered what kind of players I would be targeting. Would it be the townish ones, or the scummy ones, or the null reads? I decided against targeting a townish player, since the most likely outcome would be, except for learning nothing at all,was that the player had been killed and I would be no wiser.
Something fishy is going on here. When zoraster claimed this, I assumed that Littlefinger didn't exist in the setup at all. Unfortunately Feysal never posted between this fake claim and zoraster's death, so we don't have a reaction to go off of. We do have this reaction the following day:zoraster wrote:CLAIM TIME
I'm Tommen Baratheon. I become king if Joffrey dies, but I'm not ready for that responsibility. I need to have Petyr Baelish killed. If Joffrey or I die before Petyr does, I lose. If Petyr is killed (whether by getting lynched or night killed) or if Joffrey doesn't die, I win with the Lannisters.
I was told who Petyr is (Locke Lamora), but I don't know who Joffrey is. I wasn't told LL's alignment, but I can only guess the reason I'd be given this role is because he's not-Lannister and possibly to protect a Joffrey claim.
My power is this: each night I can pick one person to set up a QT to chat with for the rest of the game.
That's it. I had hoped more pressure would come on LL today, but when I realized it wouldn't, I figured I'd scum hunt today, hope LL got killed tonight, and I could use my QT to try and possibly hook up with Joff.
Of course at this point we'd already had the lynch and it was already clear he was lying, so there is a giant ball of WIFOM around this.Feysal wrote:Another day. I have little to say about how yesterday ended. I never really got why so many people found Zoraster scummier than Raivann, but after his claim it was obvious he was lying, and had to die.
Scum can make walls of text too.Shadow1psc wrote:I've thought about it. Been reading. It's a lot of huge giant walls of text from people, which makes me think there is a lot of town fighting with town while scum lie low (yes I realize I'm guilty of 'lying low'). Perfect example is Thor escaping into obscurity, then only coming back with the occasional 'wah, still catching up... almost caught up... almost caught up...' (etc).Locke Lamora wrote:Hey Shadow, have you thought about not being 'intimidated' and doing some scumhunting?
Absolutely, but it's easier to spot 'scum walls' (that are attacks, not defenses mind you) because they tend to have much less content/much more stretching.Raivann wrote:Scum can make walls of text too.Shadow1psc wrote:I've thought about it. Been reading. It's a lot of huge giant walls of text from people, which makes me think there is a lot of town fighting with town while scum lie low (yes I realize I'm guilty of 'lying low'). Perfect example is Thor escaping into obscurity, then only coming back with the occasional 'wah, still catching up... almost caught up... almost caught up...' (etc).Locke Lamora wrote:Hey Shadow, have you thought about not being 'intimidated' and doing some scumhunting?
Basically because ISetael [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2864373#p2864373]#1499[/url] wrote:So... why did you say you would be unhappy if you were killed without a chance to claim if you a) thought your claim would seem scummy and not in any way help prevent your lynch and b) you had no useful info that needed shared?
Yes it did. Why he did that I cannot know, nor am I responsible for his lies.LynchMePls [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2864392#p2864392]#1503[/url] wrote:Didn't Zoraster's first fake-claim involve Littlefinger?
If you think that all caps makes you any more convincing, you are sadly mistaken. Also, I already answered this, but I will require you to explain why it "does not compute". It is a power role after all. Do you think it would be better to die with it without claiming?LynchMePls [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2864392#p2864392]#1503[/url] wrote:Plus, if Littlefinger-voyeur is your claim, why would you be "unhappy if you were killed without a chance to claim". DOES NOT COMPUTE.
Not that I did not anticipate this, I will also require you to explain why you have a problem with my claim. It seems that no matter what I say, you invariably consider it scummy, and never even consider that you could be wrong. And that, of course, is not pro-town play.LynchMePls [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2864392#p2864392]#1503[/url] wrote:This claim doesn't seem right to me. It smells like scum. This lynch should happen.
I don't know. What I wrote in #1498 is all I was told. I will be told if my target is targetted, but not by who, is all my role PM said. There was no mention of whether I'd be told what the actions were, or even how many there were.Magua [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2864503#p2864503]#1510[/url] wrote:Feysal, do you learn the nature of the targetted action, or just that there was one or more actions that targetted someone?
I was probably really frustrated when I listed Chess with his idiocy and MoI shenanigans. Or forgot about his not so subtle softclaim. I forget.Twilight Sparkle wrote:You advocate for Chess to be vigged here, well after his softclaiming of Twyin and softclaiming PR. Am I missing a subsequent change of position somewhere?Benmage wrote:Why would you ever kill a player softclaiming Twyin Lannister???
Boom. Lol.LynchMePls wrote:Seeing as how the town GAVE HIM A GOVERNOR, I think he does in fact get to dictate who we're allowed to vote.Feysal wrote:You don't get to dictate who we're allowed to suspect and vote, or where we're allowed to hunt for scum.
Yeah an SK possibly.LynchMePls wrote: diddin = SK kill is also certainly a possibility.
....Kast wrote: Meanwhile, he's protected the two most suspected players and allowed themfree reign to continue playing as anti-town as possible without any repercussions. Raivann and BunnyLover are so safe, they can directly press our claimed vigs for more role info, and even after being told to stop it, they still each pushed without any repercussions.
I dont think most would call Seteal the most scummiest. (Maybe just noobs and scum…which are you again?) You, yourself put him in as acceptable lynch but not preferred. Inconsistent? Trying to make me sound meaner than I am?Kast wrote:You've added "direction" that's bogged down town and protected the two players that were pretty much universally recognized and admitted as the scummiest players in the entire day.
Really...To A T.??? What do you disagree with?xvart wrote: Like almost to the T.
The player I doubt it from aCoK.Zdenek wrote: Benmage, what is an IDI?
Yeah...Curse giving people away the opportunity to catch up in thread! ( )Kast wrote: this has been stopped and the day drawn out to deadline as a direct result of BM's threats.
DrippingGoofball wrote: I do sometimes pretend I'm a PR when I'm vanilla, most notably and hilariously, in ongoing game, so don't ask.
Interesting.Feysal wrote: The only thing I can still say in my defense without repeating myself is who I am. However, I very much doubt my claim will help me any, in fact it is more likely to result in my quicklynch. Therefore I'll only claim when I am sufficiently prepared for death, which right now I am not.
Why would you waste your time with that? Watcher is for finding who targeted the NK victim.Feysal wrote:...but I do have the potential of confirming power claims by other people (DGB comes to mind immediately).
There's a difference between the phrase 'being sneaky' and the act of sneaking around physically. I would attribute the former to people like Petyr and Tyrion, the latter to Varys. Maybe I'm splitting hairs here.Raivann wrote:What books are you reading? Petyr is the master of the game of thrones.Shadow1psc wrote:To elaborate on that, Petyr never seemed like the sneaking type, more the type to stab you in the back from the front, if you know what I mean.
Here's the end of D1 votecount. I looked back to see any Feysal posts after zoraster's fakeclaim. But alas Feysal was nowhere to be found.MOD wrote: End of day votecount
Mikujin (3) Danakillsu, Locke Lamora, Thor665
xvart (1) DTMastere
Drippinggoofball (1) Mikujin
Raivann (5) Feysal, Zoraster, Bunnylover, xvart, Nexus
Zoraster (13) MagnaofIllusion, DrippingoofBall, Kast, LynchMePls, Raivann, Magua, Zdenek, Benmage,Ghostlin, Twilight Sparkle, diddin, chesskid3, Shadow1psc