Star Wars Quote Mafia- Game over

[Norinel]

Vote Count

TSAGod- 3 (PeaceBringer, rajrhcpfreak, Thoth)
Dranko20- 3 (TSAGod, RangerOfTheNorth, Shamrock)
RangerOfTheNorth- 1 (Dranko20)

Not voting (3!):

ibaesha

, Quailman, Coron

6 to lynch.

[ibaesha]

I think that one or both of TSAGod and Ranger is scum. Sneaking suspicion they're in it together, really.

PBug was scummy - very. I'm only partially giving Coron the benefit of the doubt at the moment.

[RangeroftheNorth]

Alright, I'd just like to point this out, I've role claimed. If you don't believe it, fine, but don't ignore it while finding me suspicious.

[ibaesha]

'Kay. Quote please? And honestly roleblocker doesn't convince me. Scum roleblocker isn't that uncommon.

Speaking of which: Have your roleblocks garnered you no information at all since Quailman? You're voting Dranko out of nothing better to do at the moment.

Actually, you just rose on my scum-o-meter.

vote: RoTN

[RangeroftheNorth]

I am going to go ahead and spell this out. I am a role blocker. Last night I blocked quailman. Quailman is not responisble for either of last nights two kills.

I have information that I am not currently willing to share. I have role blocked a variety of people, and, when some of them role claim, perhaps, I will have useful information to share. Until then, I fail to see what good giving out that information would do.

I can understand not being convinced. It just seemed that people who were finding me suspicious where ignoring the fact that I had claimed, and I wanted to point it out.

[ibaesha]

What good it will do? Any information that helps catch scum is good.
If you're not doing that, you're not helping. Unwilling to share? Fine. Vote stands.

Also noted you expect PB to share his info while witholding yours. Hypocritical dontcha think?

[RangeroftheNorth]

My information is only useful in catching scum if the scum don't know what it is. If a scum goes to role claim and says something that I can contradict, using my information, than my information helps catch scum. If I tell you all my information now, it might have very slight benefits. If I could tell you that someone who was under suspicion didn't make the kill last night, I probably would. But even that wouldn't prove anything. PB's information is only useful if everyone knows it. My information is only useful if no one knows it until a certain point.

[ibaesha]

Mmm.. so you're positive you'll be alive to share it later. Right. I can only think of one reason for being positive. Guess what it is? You're scum.

[RangeroftheNorth]

No, I'm not positive I'll be alive to share it, but I don't think the risk of my dying before I can reveal it is great enough to offset how much more useful it will be if I don't reveal it until it becomes relevant. In any case, I will not reveal it solely based on the suspicions of you and Dranko (who I'm not sure has actually read any of my posts)

[ibaesha]

Fair enough.

[RangeroftheNorth]

Where is everyone?

I think that TSAGod is a good target from the quicklynchers. He's been keeping a low profile throughout the game.

vote:TSAGod

[RangeroftheNorth]

Sorry, hit submit before I was finished.

Where is everyone?

I think that TSAGod is a good target from the quicklynchers. He's been keeping a low profile throughout the game.

vote:TSAGod

I'll Vote: Dranko also, I guess. I don't really like the TSA wagon (

because lynching zu_faul did seem to make sense at the time

) and the Ranger wagon makes even less sense to me.

The reason the quicklynchers are targeted is not because they lynched zu_faul. There were good reasons for lynching him.
The reason is that he was lynched so fast. There's no good argument to lynch him without even giving him the chance to speak, unless you're scum and don't want to give him the chance to reveal last nights result.

Alright, this isn't much, but it does seem sort of fishy. Thoth states initially that TSAGod would be a good target for the "quicklynchers" and votes him for that reason. Later, however, he states that ther quicklynchers (including TSAGod) are being targeted because they lynched zu_faul.

It isn't much, but it is better than what I have on dranko, and nothing else seems to be happening.

[RangeroftheNorth]

oh, btw

unvote
Vote: thoth

[Quailman]

I added some

bolding

to the following:

Sorry, hit submit before I was finished.

Where is everyone?

I think that

TSAGod is a good target from the quicklynchers.

He's been keeping a low profile throughout the game.

vote:TSAGod

Alright, this isn't much, but it does seem sort of fishy.

Thoth states initially that TSAGod would be a good target for the "quicklynchers" and votes him for that reason.

Later, however, he states that ther quicklynchers (including TSAGod) are being targeted because they lynched zu_faul.

Thoth said he would be a"a good target

from (among)

the quicklynchers", not

for

the quicklynchers to pursue. In looking back over TSAGod's posts, I see no reason not to vote for him. i must go back and read them more in context before I cast my vote, though.

[RangeroftheNorth]

Unvote: Thoth

I guess I misread that. Sorry

[Thoth]

You quote me and then you change 1 word in each quote when you repeat them in your own words, so they mean almost the complete opposite of what I said .

Alright, this isn't much, but it does seem sort of fishy. Thoth states initially that TSAGod would be a good target

for

the "quicklynchers" and votes him for that reason. Later, however, he states that ther quicklynchers (including TSAGod) are being targeted

because they lynched zu_faul

.

First bolding: I said

from

the quicklynchers, not for.
Second bolding: I said

not

because they lynched zu_faul.

After this remarkable twisting of my words I'd even more like to hear from Quailman whether he was indeed blocked the last two nights as Ranger says. Of course Q may have a role with which he can not know that.

[Thoth]

<-- Needs to learn to type faster

[RangeroftheNorth]

i only have claimed to block quailman 1 night

[Quailman]

Sorry. I wouldn't know if I was blocked or not. Blocking me has no effect, unless you consider that it keeps the blocker from blocking someone where it would have mattered.

[Thoth]

Quailman is not responisble for either of last nights two kills.

Sorry, guess you're not the only one misreading. Read this is not responsiblefor a kill last two nights.

[Norinel]

Activity check: Prodding PeaceBringer, Dranko20, TSAGod. Next check Wednesday. Considering a deadline.

Vote Count

TSAGod- 3 (PeaceBringer, rajrhcpfreak, Thoth)
RangerOfTheNorth- 3 (Dranko20,

ibaesha

)
Dranko20- 2 (TSAGod, Shamrock)

Not voting (3!): Quailman, Coron, RangerOfTheNorth

6 to lynch.

[Dranko20]

unvote; vote coron

[TSAGod]

unvote; vote coron

WTF?

[RangeroftheNorth]

Vote: Dranko

Everytime I unvote Dranko, he gives me another good reason to vote for him. I think TSAGod's response sums it up pretty well, dranko: WTF?

[PeaceBringer]

fine, I heard enough to back off tsa for now.

The dranko move was a WTF.

unvote, vote dranko