Star Wars Quote Mafia- Game over

Quailman · Post Post #625 (ISO) » Tue Jan 17, 2006 6:16 am

I haven't necessarily "heard enough to back off tsa," but as for dranko, WTF? He's at 4 now. I'll wait for his response to avoid a potential lynching simulpost.

Shamrock · Post Post #626 (ISO) » Tue Jan 17, 2006 12:18 pm

He certainly seems scummy now... but we can wait until he shows up to say something to lynch, I guess.

ibaesha · Post Post #627 (ISO) » Tue Jan 17, 2006 2:10 pm

Checking in: I'd like to hear from Dranko before finishing him off. Otherwise, happy where my votes are currently.

I have -very- limited access for the next 2-3 weeks. I will try to check in as often as possible. I will understand if I need to be replaced.

ibaesha · Post Post #628 (ISO) » Tue Jan 17, 2006 7:13 pm

Scratch the limited access. I got a computer running.

Dranko20 · Post Post #629 (ISO) » Tue Jan 17, 2006 7:37 pm

lol

why arent i lynched yet?

Thoth · Post Post #630 (ISO) » Tue Jan 17, 2006 9:21 pm

Dranko is certainly a good option. The main thing that worries me is that he counterclaimed SOS earlier in the game. I cannot remember many counterclaims by scum this early in the game.

Norinel · Post Post #631 (ISO) » Wed Jan 18, 2006 5:17 am

Activity check: Prodding raj and Coron. Next check Sunday, 1 PMish Eastern.

Deadline: 7 days from this post.

Vote Count

Dranko20- 4 (TSAGod, Shamrock, RangerOfTheNorth, PeaceBringer)
TSAGod- 2 (rajrhcpfreak, Thoth)
RangerOfTheNorth- 2 (

ibaesha

)
Coron- 1 (Dranko20)

Not voting (

3

2): Quailman, Coron

6 to lynch, 3 at deadline.

rajrhcpfreak · Post Post #632 (ISO) » Wed Jan 18, 2006 2:07 pm

vote: dranko20

you ask and you shall receive.

rajrhcpfreak · Post Post #633 (ISO) » Wed Jan 18, 2006 2:07 pm

unvote

vote: dranko20

you ask and you shall receive.

Dranko20 · Post Post #634 (ISO) » Wed Jan 18, 2006 3:04 pm

im not asking. i'm just saying, you guys are idiots so why not lynch me earlier.

i guess you can just do what you want. coron is still scum.

Coron · Post Post #635 (ISO) » Wed Jan 18, 2006 5:01 pm

not.

vote: dranko

RangeroftheNorth · Post Post #636 (ISO) » Wed Jan 18, 2006 5:55 pm

Umm, Dranko?

PeaceBringer wrote:Investigated

n1 shamrock
n2 thoth
n3 Ibesha
n4 coron

And PB got all innocent results. It's possible that coron is a GF, or that PB is naive, but unless you have evidence, there's no reason to believe it.

Dranko20 · Post Post #637 (ISO) » Wed Jan 18, 2006 8:23 pm

oh shit

unvote vote rajrhcpfreak

Dranko20 · Post Post #638 (ISO) » Wed Jan 18, 2006 8:25 pm

ranger i need you to jump on my bandwagon right now

ibaesha · Post Post #639 (ISO) » Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:38 pm

unvote; finishing vote: Dranko20

Obviously not going to defend himself and voting raj is bogus.

Norinel · Post Post #640 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2006 6:32 am

Vote Count

Dranko20- 7 (TSAGod, Shamrock, RangerOfTheNorth, PeaceBringer, rajrhcpfreak,

ibaesha

)
TSAGod- 1 (Thoth)
rajrhcpfreak- 1 (Dranko20)

Not voting (

3

2): Quailman, Coron

6 to lynch.

Day 5

With the threat of an early shutdown looming, the quotes eject Dranko, who was infected with the same thing Fritzler was.

Dranko20 ("It was a boring pants anyway.", cultist) - lynched Day 5

It is now Night 6, send choices. Deadline four days from this post.

Norinel · Post Post #641 (ISO) » Mon Jan 23, 2006 9:20 am

Night 5

This time, rajrhcpfreak has been deleted, and the bad news is that his capabilities were exactly what he said they were. The good news is that his ties to the virus weren't.

And today Thoth has the double vote.

rajrchpfreak ("In response to the direct threat to the Republic mesa propose that the Senate give immediately emergency powers to the Supreme Chancellor.", vote-doubling mafia spy) - deleted Night 6

It is now Day 6, 8 alive and 9 votes means 5 to lynch.

TSAGod · Post Post #642 (ISO) » Mon Jan 23, 2006 11:13 am

hm...

vote ibeasha

for obvious reasons. Claim?

Shamrock · Post Post #643 (ISO) » Mon Jan 23, 2006 11:44 am

FOS: ibaesha

, also for obvious reasons.

ibaesha · Post Post #644 (ISO) » Mon Jan 23, 2006 12:52 pm

Well, I feel set up. I take it the 'obvious reasons' are that Raj continually gave me a double-vote. I'm ready to claim if necessary. 'Obvious' or just an easy scapegoat? The way you both jumped on that is damn suspicious to me.

FOS: Shamrock and TSAGod

TSAGod · Post Post #645 (ISO) » Mon Jan 23, 2006 2:14 pm

Yes, it is a possibility that raj was doing that, and judging by the nightkill, unless there is a vig which would kill him, there is little reason for the mafia to kill raj except to frame you.

But despite the doubts in the motives of raj's killing, it is a very obvious path that needs to be followed.

Anyway, I check enough that I can unvote if there looks to be a problem, so I wasn't stressing it.

My vote definately isn't a lynching vote, so don't think of it as anything more.

rajrhcpfreak · Post Post #646 (ISO) » Mon Jan 23, 2006 4:05 pm

dang it.

Thoth · Post Post #647 (ISO) » Mon Jan 23, 2006 11:05 pm

vote:TSAGod

Still the same reasons why I voted him yesterday and now he added another one with his vote on Ibaesha.
I'm not sure what the 'obvious' reasons are for voting Ibaesha, but her continuously getting the double vote would seem like a good reason to keep raj alive if Ibaesha was scum.

Quailman · Post Post #648 (ISO) » Tue Jan 24, 2006 7:08 am

And today you have the double votes, so there's a more obvious reason to vote for you. For some reason, he chose to change to whom he gave the double votes. Explain that one.

vote: Thoth

Shamrock · Post Post #649 (ISO) » Tue Jan 24, 2006 9:11 am

I think a suspicion of Ibaesha at this point is pretty self-explanatory, given that she has received raj's double-vote multiple times and raj turned out to be mafia. I'm not voting because I don't think it means she's necessarily scum, but she's certainly worth keeping an eye on for now.